GECo: Implementation and Effectiveness of COPD Case-Finding in Low and Middle Income Countries (GECo1)

June 14, 2023 updated by: University College, London

Global Excellence in COPD Outcomes: Implementation and Effectiveness of COPD Case-Finding in Low and Middle Income Countries

This study will test how well short questionnaires, with and without a simple breathing test called 'peak flow', can identify people with COPD compared to the gold-standard diagnostic test called spirometry. We will test this in 10,500 people from three low- and middle-income countries, namely Nepal, Peru and Uganda. We will also examine the feasibility of implementing our case-finding intervention at scale.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

The investigators will determine whether case-finding for COPD can be facilitated using 5-item questionnaires with and without a measurement of Peak-Flow. The investigators hypothesise that 5-item questionnaires will be a valid case-finding tool for COPD in LMIC and will be acceptable and feasible for use in these settings.

  1. Clinical Aim: Determine the diagnostic accuracy of the case-finding questionnaires with and without PEF.
  2. Implementation Aim: Assess the appropriateness, acceptability and feasibility of using questionnaires and PEF to identify COPD cases from the perspective of local community members, community health workers, local health centre physicians and ministries of health.

The design of the intervention will be informed by formative work prior to commencement of the main study.

Study fieldworkers will enroll and screen a randomly-selected age- and sex-stratified population sample of adults aged ≥40 years; a total of 10,500 between the following three countries in the catchment areas of existing community census areas in Bhaktapur (Nepal), Lima (Peru), and Nakaseke (Uganda).

The investigators will report the sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of the case-finding questionnaire, with and without PEF, in relation to a gold standard COPD diagnosis made at spirometry (post-bronchodilator FEV1/VC ratio <LLN, with a history of significant respiratory exposure to tobacco smoke or biomass). The investigators will construct ROC curves to visualise trade-offs in sensitivity and specificity across a range of questionnaire cut off values.

The investigators will also examine the feasibility of implementing a 5 item questionnaire +/- PEF intervention at scale.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

10709

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Kathmandu, Nepal
        • Institute of Medicine
      • Lima, Peru
        • Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
      • Makerere, Uganda
        • Makerere University Lung Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

A randomly-selected age- and sex-stratified population sample of adults aged ≥40 years; a total of 10,500 will be recruited from the following three countries in the catchment areas of existing community census areas, in Bhaktapur (Nepal), Lima (Peru), and Nakaseke (Uganda).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female participants aged ≥40 years
  • Full-time resident in the area (living in area > 6 months)
  • Able to perform adequate quality spirometry
  • Capable of providing informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy (self-reported)
  • Currently has active pulmonary TB or is taking medications for pulmonary TB

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity, Specificity and Positive Predictive Value of Simple Case Finding tools
Time Frame: 12 months
Sensitivity, Specificity and Positive Predictive Value of the case-finding questionnaires with and without peak-expiratory flow (PEF), compared to spirometry.
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fidelity - Proportion of Questionnaires with Missing Data Fields
Time Frame: 12 months
Extent to which delivery adheres to the protocol developed. The investigators will report the proportion of incomplete questionnaires (any questionnaires with one or more missing data fields) in total and at each individual site.
12 months
Health Economics
Time Frame: 12 months

Health-related productivity costs measured as hours of lost work from COPD and related symptoms.

Inequalities in productivity costs according to illness severity and wealth status.

12 months
Process Evaluation - Actual number of participants recruited against target.
Time Frame: 12 months
Total number of participants successfully recruited into the study against the target figure determined by the power calculations.
12 months
Fidelity - Spirometry Quality Control Failures
Time Frame: 12 months

Extent to which delivery adheres to the protocol developed. Spirometry delivery - Only tests which meet both acceptability and repeatability criteria as per ERS/ATS (European Respiratory Society / American Thoracic Society) guidelines will be accepted.

Spirometry interpretation - All Spirometry preformed will be over-read locally, and a proportion (see below) will be over-read centrally. Two separate researchers, at each site, adequately trained in both spirometry delivery and interpretation will separately perform interpretation of all spriometry carried out in the field, to ensure correct interpretation in relation to a gold standard COPD diagnosis made at spirometry (post-bronchodilator FEV1/VC ratio <LLN, with a history of significant respiratory exposure to tobacco smoke or biomass) . Of these, 10% will be over-read centrally by the principal investigators to ensure quality assurance.

12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 8, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 9, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

March 9, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 17, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 1, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

December 7, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

June 16, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 14, 2023

Last Verified

June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

3
Subscribe