Impact of the Pre-phonatory Inspiratory Volume on the Speech Quality of Neuromuscular Patients Dependent on Non-invasive Ventilation (PREPHONO)

We want to demonstrate that modifications of the ventilation parameters are liable to improve the different characteristics of phonation (duration, intensity, prosody..) in neuromuscular patients who are dependent on non invasive ventilation.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Speech and communication quality depend on respiration efficiency. The respiratory involvement observed in neuromuscular disorders can impair speech quality in patients, while the underlying disease may also contribute to alter phonation.

Nowadays, the first line treatment of neuromuscular chronic neuromuscular respiratory failure is noninvasive ventilation (NIV). With disease progression, it is used with increasingly duration during daytime. In that situation, mouthpiece ventilation is preferred as it allows efficient ventilation while being more comfortable for patients who can chose when they want to be ventilated. However, in that situation, patients do not receive ventilatory support while they are speaking which puts them in a less favorable situation for speech. We think that pre-phonation inspiratory volume is an essential part of speech quality. Without mechanical ventilation, this volume is reduced as a consequence of respiratory failure but it is liable to increase significantly if the patient used the volume delivered by the ventilator .

We believe that phonation is improved by NIV by applying specific ventilation parameters in patients dependant on mechanical ventilation. The modification could be used by neuromuscular patients to improve speech quality; the patients would then be able to use their usual ventilatory support to improve phonation and modulation of their speech.

In this crossover open labelled, randomised study, done in a single center (home ventilation unit of the referral center of Hospital Raymond Poincaré HUPIFO (University Hospital of Western Paris and Ile de France) (Garches, France)), phonation characteristics will be studied in 3 situations (during spontaneous breathing without ventilatory support, with the usual NIV parameters, with speech-specific NIV parameters) during which speech trials will be performed.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

15

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Garches, France, 92380
        • Recruiting
        • Raymond Poincaré Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Hélène PRIGENT, MD PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adult patients (age > or equal to 18)
  • chronic restrictive respiratory failure due to neuromuscular disease
  • spontaneous breathing autonomy of at least one hour during the days
  • stable clinical state
  • patient with middle school education level (able to read)
  • patients using life support ventilator ((Astral 150 (ResMed®), Elysée (ResMed®), Trilogy (Philips Respironics®), VentilogicLS (Weinman®), Vivo 40 (Breas®), PB560 ou Légendair (Covidien®), Monal T50 (Air liquide system®))

Exclusion Criteria:

  • refusal to participate
  • unability to cooperate
  • illiterate patients
  • tracheostomised patients
  • spontaneous breathing autonomy < 1h
  • cardiovascular instability
  • not registered with the social security system

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Spontaneous breathing
Spontaneous breathing without mechanical ventilation
Experimental: Conventional mechanical ventilation
Conventional mechanical ventilation, with patient ventilator usual parameters
speech trial during different ventilation conditions
Experimental: Speech specific mechanical ventilation
Mechanical ventilation with specific parameters to improve speech
speech trial during different ventilation conditions

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Phonation duration
Time Frame: 1 hour
evaluation by the measurement of the longest duration of a sustained A sound. The subject is asked to sustain a vowel as long as possible during a respiratory cycle while being recorded. Phonation duration is measured (in seconds) on the recording
1 hour

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Speech Intelligibility
Time Frame: 1 hour
assessment of intelligibility during reading of preselected words by listeners blinded to ventilation condition with a validated scale
1 hour
Quality of prosodia
Time Frame: 1 hour
evaluation of prosodia by listeners blinded to ventilation condition with a score based on the number of correct identification
1 hour
Phonation flow
Time Frame: 1 hour
Measurement of the number of syllables/min during the reading of a predetermined text
1 hour
Reading duration
Time Frame: 1 hour
Measurement of the duration for the reading of a predetermined text
1 hour
Phonation quality
Time Frame: 1 hour
evaluation of the phonation quality by the patient with a horizontal visual analogical scale ranked from 0 to 10 (0= very poor quality and 10= very good quality). The scale is 10 cm long ; the patient indicate his perceived sensation on the scale and the according measure (between 0 and 10) is recorded
1 hour
Breathing quality
Time Frame: 1 hour
evaluation of the breating quality during speech in each condition by the patient with a horizontal visual analogical scale ranked from 0 to 10 (0= very uncomfortable and 10= very comfortable). The scale is 10 cm long ; the patient indicate his perceived sensation and the according measure (between 0 and 10) is recorded
1 hour

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 6, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 21, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 21, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

December 22, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 30, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 29, 2019

Last Verified

August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neuromuscular Diseases

Clinical Trials on speech trial

3
Subscribe