Evaluation of the Effect of a Speech Detection Tool on the Improvement of Phonation in Neuromuscular Patients Dependent on Mechanical Ventilation (Ventiphono)

Ventilation is a major treatment of respiratory failure due to neuromuscular disorders. First line treatment is noninvasive ventilation (NIV) but in some situations, especially in case of NIV inefficiency, invasive ventilation with tracheostomy (IVT) may be required. In both situations, patients may become dependent on ventilatory support with the disease evolution. Ventilation then can interfere speech and the quality of communication of the patients. Modification of the ventilation parameters may result in improved speech quality (for example, positive expiratory pressure (PEP) while not necessary for ventilation quality can dramatically improve speech in tracheostomized patients). Therefore, it would be of interest to allow patients to benefit from these specific parameters when they need to speak without maintaining them when patients are not speaking. We want to evaluate a specific ventilator feature which can detect speech and switch to specific ventilation parameters adapted for speech We believe that this feature will improve significantly speech quality in patients dependant either on NIV or IVT.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Nowadays, the first line treatment of chronic respiratory failure in neuromuscular disorder is non invasive ventilation (NIV). However, while NIV can compensate the respiratory disability and significantly delays significantly the necessity for invasive ventilation with a tracheostomy (IVT), it is used for significant periods of time during daytime in patients with severe respiratory failure and can therefore interfere with patients' speech. Moreover, if NIV becomes inefficient, IVT may be required to pursue ventilatory support to treat the respiratory failure; tracheostomy also interferes with phonation and specific adaptations are necessary to optimize phonation and speech quality.

Adaptation of ventilation parameters (mainly triggering sensitivity and use of positive expiratory pressure (PEP)) can significantly improve speech quality and therefore ventilated patients' communication. These adapted parameters are not strictly necessary for ventilation outside of speaking periods. It would be of interest to be able to use them exclusively during speech. In neuromuscular patients, the major motor disability constitutes a challenge as most patients are unable to use themselves the controls of their ventilator (and to potentially switch to a speech adapted ventilation program). We want to evaluate a device able to automatically detect speech and to transitorily switch from the patient's usual ventilation parameters to speech specific parameters set to optimize phonation quality.

Specific adaptations differs between NIV or IVT, therefore we will evaluation two groups of ventilation dependent patients divided according to their ventilation mode.

We believe that this device may improve the speech of NIV patients as well as IVT patients. Patients would benefit from an appropriate ventilator support without any ventilation desynchronization during speech. Speech would be more fluent and natural which would result in improved communication.

Objectives The main objective of this study is to demonstrate that phonation is improved by the use of a device allowing the transitory switch to specific speech parameters of ventilation in neuromuscular ventilator dependent patient whether during NIV or during IMT.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

28

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Garches, France, 92380
        • Recruiting
        • Raymond Poincaré Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Hélène PRIGENT, MD PhD
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adult patients (age > or equal to 18)
  • Neuromuscular patients with a restrictive respiratory failure without major bulbar involvement.
  • Adult patient.
  • Ventilator dependancy= ventilation duration of 16h/day or more either with NIV or IMT
  • Leak ventilation for IMT patients
  • Respiratory autonomy of at leat 1h per day
  • Usual ventilation mode : assist control mode (either pressure or volume controlled mode) ou spontaneous breathing mode with target volume
  • Stable hemodynamic state
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal to participate
  • Use of cuffed tracheostomy tube
  • Inability to read
  • Pregnancy
  • Protected adults
  • Acute respiratory failure
  • Hemodynamic instability
  • not registered with the social security system

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Conventional mechanical ventilation
Conventional mechanical ventilation, with patient ventilator usual parameters
Experimental: Adapted mechanical ventilation
Mechanical ventilation with parameters specifically modified to improve speech the effect is evaluated with speech trials during different ventilation conditions
ventilator parameters are modified
reading duration, vocal flow, intelligibility and voice quality will be evaluated during speech

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
reading duration
Time Frame: 15 minutes
duration for reading a specific text in seconds
15 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Vocal flow
Time Frame: 15 minutes
vocal flow in syllables/second during the reading of a specific text
15 minutes
vocal range
Time Frame: 2 minutes
vocal range from lowest to highest pitch
2 minutes
intelligibility
Time Frame: 15 minutes
evaluation of intelligibility during reading evaluated by listeners blinded to ventilation conditions
15 minutes
Speech quality
Time Frame: 5 min
evaluation of prosodia by listeners blinded to ventilation conditions
5 min
Speech quality
Time Frame: 1 minute
evaluation of speech quality by the patient using a visual analogical scale
1 minute
Speech comfort
Time Frame: 1 minute
evaluation of speech comfort by the patient using a visual analogical scale
1 minute
Respiratory comfort
Time Frame: 1 minute
evaluation of respiratory comfort by the patient using a visual analogical scale
1 minute
dyspnea
Time Frame: 1 minute
evaluation of dyspnea during speech evaluated with the modified Borg scale (ranking from 0 to10)
1 minute
oxygen saturation
Time Frame: 15 min
evaluation of Respiratory tolerance during speech by measuring oxygen saturation
15 min
respiratory rate
Time Frame: 15 min
evaluation of Respiratory tolerance during speech by measuring respiratory rate
15 min
cardiac frequency
Time Frame: 15 min
evaluation of Cardiovascular tolerance during speech by measuring cardiac frequency
15 min
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 1 minute
evaluation of Patient satisfaction with speech with the ventilation mode by the patient using a visual analogical scale
1 minute

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hélène Prigent, MD PhD, Raymond Poincaré Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 6, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 12, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 19, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

April 20, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 18, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 15, 2019

Last Verified

August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2017-A00109-44

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neuromuscular Diseases

3
Subscribe