Clinical Validation Protocol for BCI for the Communication of Patients Suffering From Neuromuscular Disorders. (PVCAFM)

Protocole de Validation Clinique du Logiciel d'Interface Cerveau-Ordinateur RoBIK Pour la Communication Des Patients Atteints de Maladie Neuromusculaires (MNM)

the objective of this protocol is evaluate the safety and tolerance of a communication system for severely disable patients with myopathies. The system analyses the brain electric activity in real time and converts it into digital commands for a spelling device, which is refered to as the P300 speller in the scientific literature. The secondary objective is to compare the performance of such tool with a more traditional assistive technology for the communication of severely disabled patients : scanner systems.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This is a pilot study for which 15 patients with myopathies will be included. The primary objective of the study is to assess the safety and tolerance of a system for communication named P300 speller. The P3Speller is a brain computer interface (BCI) that records the brain electric activity with the use of electroencephalography (EEG) and analyzes it in real time in order to identify slight changes generated in relation to a visual stimulation (evoked potentials). The identification of such brain potentials is translated into a digital command for a spelling device. The secondary objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of this spelling device with a more traditional assisitve technology called scanner interface. A scanner interface uses single clicks that can be obtaines with an adequate interface which exploits the remaining muscular activity from a patients.

Every patient will use each interface (P300 sepller and Scanning) with a randomized order. Results will bec o,pared in terms of information flow from the patient to the computer expressed in bit rate per minute.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

15

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Garches, France, 92380
        • Hôpital R. Poincaré

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

neuromuscular disease patients

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult older than 18y.o., diagnosed with neuromuscular disease, stable vital signs and informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of seizure, brain damage, sight or auditory dysfunction, Atopic dermatitis, skin hypersensitivity to gold, patient under guardianship, illiterates or not able to cooperate , cognitive dysfunction
  • Steinert disease, Merosine negative disease, Alpha-dystroglycanopathies

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Brain Computer Interface
Patients will test the brain computer interface system
Recording the P300 Testing the device Using the device with a speller

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Bit rate (BR) the amount fo information that flows from the patient to the computer during the spelling session. This criterion is a combination of the number of symbols selected, the accuracy, and the time.
Time Frame: 30 minutes

The comparison criteria for performance was the bitrate, br, that is defined by (Wolpow et al. 2000):

〖br=log〗_2 (M)+p.log_2 p+(1-p) 〖log〗_2 (1-p)/(M-1) where M=36 is the number of symbols p the spelling accuracy (the percentage of correctly identified symbols).

30 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
patient satisfaction (visual analogic scale)
Time Frame: 2 minutes
2 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David Orlikowski, MDPhD, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 3, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 4, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

November 5, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 20, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 19, 2017

Last Verified

April 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 14055

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Communication

Clinical Trials on Brain computer interface

3
Subscribe