Prospective Observational Study on Ustekinumab (Stelara) Assessing Efficacy and Healthcare Resource Utilization in Crohn's Disease (PROSE)

January 31, 2025 updated by: Janssen-Cilag Ltd.

Prospective Observational Study on Stelara Assessing Efficacy and Healthcare Resource Utilization in Crohn's Disease (PROSE)

The main purpose of this study is to assess ustekinumab's ability to induce clinical response and remission ("effectiveness") at Week 16 and remission at Week 52 and Week 104 in participants with Crohn's disease (CD). Response and remission will be assessed using clinical parameters. Retention rate at week 52 and 104 will also be studied.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

114

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Örebro, Sweden, SE-70185
        • Universitetssjukhuset Örebro

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Participants with a confirmed Crohn's disease (CD) aged over 18 years treated with ustekinumab.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participant has a diagnosis of CD confirmed by investigator
  • Participants with active CD who have had an inadequate response with, lost response to, or were intolerant to either conventional therapy or a biologic therapy or have medical contraindications to such therapies
  • The participant must sign informed consent before enrollment in the study. The consent form permits extraction of data from SWIBREG at baseline and during participation of the study and linkages to the Patient Registry (Patientregistret), SCB's registry USA for occupational details (Longitudinell integrationsdatabas for sjukforsakrings- och arbetsmarknadsstudi er), the Social Insurance registry on long-term sick leave (Forsakringskassans register gallande sjukskrivningar) and the Prescription registry (Lakemedelsregistret)
  • The participant must have been initiated on treatment with ustekinumab within the last 2 weeks (that is including those who already discontinued) or started on ustekinumab treatment less than (<) 3 months ago if treatment start was documented in SWIBREG within 2 weeks of onset and has a record of Harvey Bradshaw Index (HBI) when starting ustekinumab

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The participant is enrolled in a clinical trial (randomized or non-randomized) in which the treatment of CD is dictated by a study protocol. If the participant is participating in another observational study (non-interventional), the participant may be included in this observational study
  • Received an investigational drug (including investigational vaccines) or used an invasive investigational medical device within 60 days before the start of the study or the first data collection time point
  • Participants who started ustekinumab despite contraindications for use
  • Participants with planned stop of treatment with ustekinumab within 24 months from onset of treatment, that is bridging to other treatment or pregnancy planned

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Participants with Crohn's Disease (CD)
Participants with CD will be assessed for the effectiveness of ustekinumab in accordance with national guidelines and routine standard of care. Data will be prospectively collected with the aid of the Swedish inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) registry, SWIBREG and medical records of each participant. Data will also be collected retrospectively from SWIBREG and other databases including national databases such as the participant registry in which cases the national databases will be considered source data.
Participants that are initiated on treatment with ustekinumab and are registered in Swibreg will be recruited into the cohort. All aspects of treatment and clinical management of participants will be in accordance with local clinical practice and applicable local regulations, and at the discretion of the participating physician.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants with Clinical Response at Week 16, Based on Harvey Bradshaw Index (HBI)
Time Frame: Week 16
Clinical response for Crohn's disease (CD) is assessed by Harvey Bradshaw Index (HBI) and is defined as decrease of 3 points in baseline HBI score. HBI consists of clinical parameters: general well-being (0-4, where higher score means lower well-being), abdominal pain (0-3, higher score means more severe pain), number of liquid stools per day, abdominal mass (0-3, where higher score means presence of swelling in the abdomen), and complications (score 1 per item). Total score is the sum of individual parameters. The score ranges from a minimum score of 0 to no pre-specified maximum score as it depends on the number of liquid stools per day and number of complications, where higher scores indicates more severe disease and, score is presented as: less than (<)5 (remission), 5-7 (mild disease), 8-16 (moderate disease), and greater than (>)16 (severe disease).
Week 16
Percentage of Participants with Clinical Remission at Week 16, Based on HBI
Time Frame: Week 16
Clinical remission for CD is assessed by HBI and is defined as HBI less than (<)5. HBI consists of clinical parameters: general well-being (0-4, where higher score means lower well-being), abdominal pain (0-3, higher score means more severe pain), number of liquid stools per day, abdominal mass (0-3, where higher score means presence of swelling in the abdomen), and complications (score 1 per item). Total score is the sum of individual parameters. The score ranges from a minimum score of 0 to no pre-specified maximum score as it depends on the number of liquid stools per day and number of complications, where higher scores indicates more severe disease and, score indicates: less than (<)5 (remission), 5-7 (mild disease), 8-16 (moderate disease), and greater than (>)16 (severe disease).
Week 16
Percentage of Participants with Clinical Remission at Week 52, Based on HBI
Time Frame: Week 52
Clinical remission for CD is assessed by HBI and is defined as HBI <5. HBI consists of clinical parameters: general well-being (0-4, where higher score means lower well-being), abdominal pain (0-3, higher score means more severe pain), number of liquid stools per day, abdominal mass (0-3, where higher score means presence of swelling in the abdomen), and complications (score 1 per item). Total score is the sum of individual parameters. The score ranges from a minimum score of 0 to no pre-specified maximum score as it depends on the number of liquid stools per day and number of complications, where higher scores indicates more severe disease and, score is presented as: less than (<)5 (remission), 5-7 (mild disease), 8-16 (moderate disease), and greater than (>)16 (severe disease).
Week 52
Percentage of Participants with Clinical Remission at Week 104, Based on HBI
Time Frame: Week 104
Clinical remission for CD is assessed by HBI and is defined as HBI <5. HBI consists of clinical parameters: general well-being (0-4, where higher score means lower well-being), abdominal pain (0-3, higher score means more severe pain), number of liquid stools per day, abdominal mass (0-3, where higher score means presence of swelling in the abdomen), and complications (score 1 per item). Total score is the sum of individual parameters. The score ranges from a minimum score of 0 to no pre-specified maximum score as it depends on the number of liquid stools per day and number of complications, where higher scores indicates more severe disease and, score is presented as: less than (<)5 (remission), 5-7 (mild disease), 8-16 (moderate disease), and greater than (>)16 (severe disease).
Week 104

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants with Clinical Response at Week 52 and 104, Based on HBI
Time Frame: Week 52 and 104
Clinical response for CD is assessed by HBI and is defined as decrease of 3 points in baseline HBI score. HBI consists of clinical parameters: general well-being (0-4, where higher score means lower well-being), abdominal pain (0-3, higher score means more severe pain), number of liquid stools per day, abdominal mass (0-3, where higher score means presence of swelling in the abdomen), and complications (score 1 per item). Total score is the sum of individual parameters. The score ranges from a minimum score of 0 to no pre-specified maximum score as it depends on the number of liquid stools per day and number of complications, where higher scores indicates more severe disease and, score is presented as: less than (<)5 (remission), 5-7 (mild disease), 8-16 (moderate disease), and greater than (>)16 (severe disease).
Week 52 and 104
Percentage of Participants with Clinical Remission at Week 52 and 104 who are Remitters at 16 Weeks
Time Frame: Week 52 and 104
Clinical remission for CD is assessed by HBI and is defined as HBI <5. HBI consists of clinical parameters: general well-being (0-4, where higher score means lower well-being), abdominal pain (0-3, higher score means more severe pain), number of liquid stools per day, abdominal mass (0-3, where higher score means presence of swelling in the abdomen), and complications (score 1 per item). Total score is the sum of individual parameters. The score ranges from a minimum score of 0 to no pre-specified maximum score as it depends on the number of liquid stools per day and number of complications, where higher scores indicates more severe disease and, score is presented as: less than (<)5 (remission), 5-7 (mild disease), 8-16 (moderate disease), and greater than (>)16 (severe disease).
Week 52 and 104
Percentage of Participants with Clinical Remission at Week 104 who are Remitters at 52 Weeks
Time Frame: Week 104
Clinical remission for CD is assessed by HBI and is defined as HBI <5. HBI consists of clinical parameters: general well-being (0-4, where higher score means lower well-being), abdominal pain (0-3, higher score means more severe pain), number of liquid stools per day, abdominal mass (0-3, where higher score means presence of swelling in the abdomen), and complications (score 1 per item). Total score is the sum of individual parameters. The score ranges from a minimum score of 0 to no pre-specified maximum score as it depends on the number of liquid stools per day and number of complications, where higher scores indicates more severe disease and, score is presented as: less than (<)5 (remission), 5-7 (mild disease), 8-16 (moderate disease), and greater than (>)16 (severe disease).
Week 104
Percentage of Participants with Clinical Remission at Week 52 and 104 who are Responders at 16 Weeks
Time Frame: Week 52 and 104
Clinical remission for CD is assessed by HBI and is defined as HBI <5. Responders are defined as the participants with decrease of 3 points in baseline HBI score. HBI consists of clinical parameters: general well-being (0-4, where higher score means lower well-being), abdominal pain (0-3, higher score means more severe pain), number of liquid stools per day, abdominal mass (0-3, where higher score means presence of swelling in the abdomen), and complications (score 1 per item). Total score is the sum of individual parameters. The score ranges from a minimum score of 0 to no pre-specified maximum score as it depends on the number of liquid stools per day and number of complications, where higher scores indicates more severe disease.
Week 52 and 104
Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Overtime
Time Frame: Up to Week 104
Clinical remission for CD is assessed by HBI and is defined as HBI <5. HBI consists of clinical parameters: general well-being (0-4, where higher score means lower well-being), abdominal pain (0-3, higher score means more severe pain), number of liquid stools per day, abdominal mass (0-3, where higher score means presence of swelling in the abdomen), and complications (score 1 per item). Total score is the sum of individual parameters. The score ranges from a minimum score of 0 to no pre-specified maximum score as it depends on the number of liquid stools per day and number of complications, where higher scores indicates more severe disease.
Up to Week 104
Percentage of Participants with Corticosteroid Free Remission at Week 52 and 104
Time Frame: Week 52 and 104
Participants on corticosteroids at baseline will be analyzed according to the percentage of participants in remission at week 52 and 104 without corticosteroids to assess corticosteroids free remission.
Week 52 and 104
Participant's Time off Corticosteroids
Time Frame: Up to week 104
Duration for which participants were off from corticosteroids will be determined.
Up to week 104
Percentage of Participants in Every 12 weeks/8 weeks (q12 w/q8 w) maintenance groups at Week 16
Time Frame: Week 16
Percentage of participants in q12 w/q8 w maintenance groups will be determined at Week 16.
Week 16
Percentage of Participants on Initial q12 w Maintenance Dose Escalated from q12 w to q8 w in Year 1 and 2
Time Frame: Year 1 and 2
Percentage of participants on initial q12 maintenance dose escalated from q12 w to q8 w in Year 1 and 2 will be determined.
Year 1 and 2
Percentage of Participants with Dose Optimization
Time Frame: Year 1 and 2
Percentage of participants with dose optimized to other dose than 90 milligram (mg) q8 w/q12 w in maintenance in Year 1 and 2 will be determined.
Year 1 and 2
Average Maintenance Dose per Month
Time Frame: Week 52 and 104
Average maintenance dose (in mg) taken per month will be determined.
Week 52 and 104
Mean Change from Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin (fCal) Levels at Week 16, 52 and 104
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16, 52 and 104
Mean change from baseline in fCal (inflammatory biomarker) levels will be determined.
Baseline, Week 16, 52 and 104
Mean Change from Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Levels at Week 16, 52 and 104
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16, 52 and 104
Mean change from baseline in C-reactive protein (CRP) (inflammatory biomarker) levels will be determined.
Baseline, Week 16, 52 and 104
Percentage of Participants with fCal Less Than (<)250 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg)
Time Frame: Week 16, 52 and 104
Percentage of participants with fCal <250 mg/kg will be determined.
Week 16, 52 and 104
Percentage of Participants with fCal levels <250 mg/kg at Week 16, 52 and 104
Time Frame: Week 16, 52 and 104
Percentage of participants with fCal levels <250 mg/kg at Week 16, 52 and 104 will be determined in total and amongst participants with fCal levels greater than (>)250 mg/kg at baseline.
Week 16, 52 and 104
Percentage of Participants with Normalization of Plasma-CRP (P-CRP)
Time Frame: Week 16, 52 and 104
Percentage of participants with normalization of P-CRP in in participants with abnormal P-CRP at baseline will be reported. Normalization of P-CRP is defined as the high-sensitive (Hs)-CRP level <3 milligram per Liter (mg/L) or CRP below threshold of abnormal CRP concentration.
Week 16, 52 and 104
Change from Baseline in Short Health Scale (SHS) Score at Week 16, 52 and 104
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16, 52 and 104
Quality of life will be assessed by SHS score. SHS is a health related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaire in which the participants rate the disease impact on 4 important aspects of subjective health (symptoms, function, worry, and general well-being). Responses are scored on 100-mm visual analogue scales and presented as individual scores for each of the four questions. The scores are then added for a total score. Total score ranges from 0 (low disease activity) to 100 (high disease activity).
Baseline, Week 16, 52 and 104
Change from Baseline in EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-Level Health Status (EQ-5D-5L) Questionnaire at Week 16, 52 and 104
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16, 52 and 104
Quality of life will be assessed by EQ-5D-5L score. The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprises following 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each of 5 dimension is divided into 5 levels of perceived problems (Level 1: no problem, Level 2: slight problems, Level 3: moderate problems, Level 4: severe problems, and Level 5: extreme problems). The participant selects an answer for each of 5 dimensions considering response that best matches his or her health "today". The descriptive system can be represented as a health state.
Baseline, Week 16, 52 and 104
Change from Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Week 16, 52 and 104
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16, 52 and 104
The EQ-VAS self-rating scale records respondent's own assessment of his or her overall health status at time of completion, on a scale of 0 (worst imaginable health) to 100 (best imaginable health).
Baseline, Week 16, 52 and 104
Change from Baseline in the Presence of Extra Intestinal Manifestations at Week 16, 52 and 104
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16, 52 and 104
Change in the presence of extra intestinal manifestations, that is arthralgia, peripheral arthritis, anchylosing spondylitis, uveitis, erythema nodosum, pyoderma gangrenosum, primary sclerosing cholangitis, psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis will be determined.
Baseline, Week 16, 52 and 104
Healthcare Resource: Number of Imaging Procedures
Time Frame: Up to week 104
Number of imaging procedures completed as a part of healthcare resources used in participants will be reported.
Up to week 104
Healthcare Resource: Number of Laboratory Test
Time Frame: Up to Week 104
Number of Laboratory tests completed as a part of healthcare resources used in participants will be reported.
Up to Week 104
Healthcare Resource: Number of Surgical Procedures
Time Frame: Up to Week 104
Number of surgical procedures completed as a part of healthcare resources used in participants will be reported.
Up to Week 104
Healthcare Resource: Number of Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Scans
Time Frame: Up to Week 104
Number of DEXA scans performed as a part of healthcare resources used will be reported.
Up to Week 104
Healthcare Resource: Number of Participants with Endoscopies Performed
Time Frame: Up to Week 104
Number of participants with endoscopies performed as a part of healthcare resources used will be reported.
Up to Week 104
Healthcare Resource: Number of Days of Hospitalization
Time Frame: Up to Week 104
Number of days of hospitalization (defined as number of days from the day of admission to discharge) as a part of healthcare resources used will be reported.
Up to Week 104
Healthcare Resource: Number of Sick-Leaves
Time Frame: Up to Week 104
Number of sick-leaves taken by participants as a part of healthcare resources used will be reported.
Up to Week 104
Healthcare Resource: Number of Participants Using Concomitant Treatment
Time Frame: Up to Week 104
Number of participants using concomitant treatment as a part of healthcare resources used will be reported.
Up to Week 104
Healthcare Resource: Number of Health Care Visits
Time Frame: Up to Week 104
Number of health care visits to nurses, dieticians and doctors as a part of healthcare resources used will be reported.
Up to Week 104
Number of Participants with Malignancy
Time Frame: Up to Week 104
Number of participants with malignancy developed during the study will be reported.
Up to Week 104
Number of Participants Requiring Antibiotics for any Infection Occurred During the Study
Time Frame: Up to Week 104
Number of participants requiring antibiotics for any infection occurred during the study will be reported.
Up to Week 104

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Janssen-Cilag Ltd. Clinical Trial, Janssen-Cilag Ltd.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 25, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 22, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

November 22, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 28, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 11, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

April 12, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 31, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CR108430
  • CNTO1275CRD4006 (Other Identifier: Janssen-Cilag Ltd.)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Crohn Disease

Clinical Trials on Ustekinumab

Subscribe