- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03516422
Investigating Ultrasound Debridement in Wound Care
April 23, 2018 updated by: Unity Health Toronto
Ultrasound Debridement In Chronic Lower Extremity Wounds - A Pilot Study
The initial step of wound management, debridement, is thought to be critical in promoting wound healing.
Of the numerous debridement modalities, ultrasound seems to hold promising results in accelerate healing in our own clinical experience here at St. Michael's Hospital.
In brief, ultrasound debridement is a method of removing devitalized tissue through microstreaming and cavitational effects.
The non-thermal energy up-regulates cellular activity and promotes growth factor and protein synthesis, fibrinolysis, and is anti-bacterial .
The technology selectively emulsifies dead and dying tissues with micro-sized gas bubbles, stimulates membranes of surrounding healthy cells, and renders bacteria more susceptible to antibiotic treatment.
Thus, in addition to creating an optimal environment, the modality also serves to promote the process of healing.
A systematic review and meta-analysis by Voigt et al. (2011) examined the use of low-frequency (20-30 kHz) ultrasound in randomized-controlled trials.
It was found that low or high-intensity delivery of low-frequency ultrasound both promoted early healing in lower-extremity wounds.
At St. Michael's Hospital, ultrasound debridement is already being used in the wound clinic with promising results.
However, objective comparisons need to be made to validate our clinical observations.
The goal of the proposed pilot study is to assess the feasibility of our current study design.
The information gathered will allow us to refine the research methodology for the development of a larger-scale study.
Study Overview
Status
Unknown
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Ultrasound debridement is a method of removing devitalized tissue through microstreaming and cavitational effects.
The non-thermal energy up-regulates cell activity and promotes growth factor and protein synthesis, fibrinolysis, and is anti-bacterial.
The technology selectively emulsifies dead and dying tissues with micro-sized gas bubbles, stimulates membranes of surrounding healthy cells, and render bacteria more susceptible to antibiotic treatment.
Thus, in addition to creating an optimal environment, the modality also serves to promote the process of healing.
At St. Michael's Hospital, ultrasound debridement is already being used in the wound clinic with promising results.
However, objective comparisons need to be made to quantify and qualify our clinical observations.
The goal of the proposed pilot study is to assess feasibility of our current study design and allow us to refine the research methodology for the development of a larger-scale study.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Anticipated)
10
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- ADULT
- OLDER_ADULT
- CHILD
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
1. Subjects with chronic (>4 week duration) lower extremity wound (of any etiology) that have failed to improve despite using the clinic's standard approach for wound care during a 2-week period (Failure to improve is defined as less than 15% reduction in wound area)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Subjects with clinical evidence of wound infection
- Subjects with thick eschar that has not been removed
- Subjects with severe arterial insufficiency: Absence of pedal pulses, Ankle Brachial Index < 0.3, Toe Pressure < 20
- Subjects who are receiving advanced wound therapy treatment: hyperbaric therapy, biological dressings
- Subjects who are taking antibiotics
- Subjects who are using systemic steroids
- Subjects who have known contraindication to the dressing product (Acticoat®)
- Subjects who are not able to adhere to dressing change protocol or hospital visits
- Subjects with wound area reduction of > 15% during the initial two-week standard care period.
- Subjects without sufficient English language proficiency to understand the consent form.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
- Masking: SINGLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: STANDARD CARE GROUP
The subject positioned so absorbent pads are in position to catch irrigation solution.
The saline bottle will be held 10-15 cm from wound bed, and squeezed to spray all surfaces of wound in a sweeping motion, from clean to dirty area of wound.
Irrigation will be repeated as necessary to remove exudate, slough, and debris from the wound until the solution draining from the wound is clear.
Peri-wound skin will be cleansed using gauze and sterile normal saline and dry.
Packing material will be applied (Acticoat®) into the wound cavity, undermining, or tunnel to fill the dead space without causing the wound to stretch or bulge or be packed tightly.
Packing should be in contact with entire wound base and edges.
Dressings changed once every 3 days by the patient's care provider.
|
The subject positioned so absorbent pads are in position to catch irrigation solution.
The saline bottle will be held 10-15 cm from wound bed, and squeezed to spray all surfaces of wound in a sweeping motion, from clean to dirty area of wound.
Irrigation will be repeated as necessary to remove exudate, slough, and debris from the wound until the solution draining from the wound is clear.
Peri-wound skin will be cleansed using gauze and sterile normal saline and dry.
Packing material will be applied (Acticoat®) into the wound cavity, undermining, or tunnel to fill the dead space without causing the wound to stretch or bulge or be packed tightly.
Packing should be in contact with entire wound base and edges.
Dressings changed once every 3 days by the patient's care provider.
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: ULTRASOUND DEBRIDEMENT GROUP:
Low-frequency ultrasound SonicOne O.R. (Misonix, New York, US) generates ultrasound waves with 22.5 kHz frequency.
Each probe is attached to a set of irrigation solution (saline 0.9%), they transform electric energy into mechanical vibrations to induce tiny particles of water from irrigation fluid.
Absorbent pads are positioned to catch excess saline.
With SonicOne set at continuous mode with minimum pump flow, the debridement will begin at most distal aspect of ulcer with the hand piece in constant motion until entire ulcer surface has been debrided until as much necrotic tissue has been removed.
Peri-wound skin will be cleansed using gauze and sterile normal saline and dry.
Packing material will be applied (Acticoat®) into wound cavity.
|
Low-frequency ultrasound SonicOne O.R. (Misonix, New York, US) generates ultrasound waves with 22.5 kHz frequency.
Each probe is attached to a set of irrigation solution (saline 0.9%), they transform electric energy into mechanical vibrations to induce tiny particles of water from irrigation fluid.
Absorbent pads are positioned to catch excess saline.
With SonicOne set at continuous mode with minimum pump flow, the debridement will begin at most distal aspect of ulcer with the hand piece in constant motion until entire ulcer surface has been debrided until as much necrotic tissue has been removed.
Peri-wound skin will be cleansed using gauze and sterile normal saline and dry.
Packing material will be applied (Acticoat®) into wound cavity.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Wound healing
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
Healing of the wound
|
8 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in biofilm microbiome
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
Shift in biofilm to reflect wound healing
|
8 weeks
|
|
Reduction in bacterial colonization
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
Decreased bacterial colonization to reflect wound healing
|
8 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Karen Cross, MD, PhD, Staff Plastic Surgeon
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Alguire PC, Mathes BM. Skin biopsy techniques for the internist. J Gen Intern Med. 1998 Jan;13(1):46-54. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00009.x.
- Altland OD, Dalecki D, Suchkova VN, Francis CW. Low-intensity ultrasound increases endothelial cell nitric oxide synthase activity and nitric oxide synthesis. J Thromb Haemost. 2004 Apr;2(4):637-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2004.00655.x.
- Gardner SE, Frantz RA, Saltzman CL, Hillis SL, Park H, Scherubel M. Diagnostic validity of three swab techniques for identifying chronic wound infection. Wound Repair Regen. 2006 Sep-Oct;14(5):548-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00162.x.
- Miller CN, Newall N, Kapp SE, Lewin G, Karimi L, Carville K, Gliddon T, Santamaria NM. A randomized-controlled trial comparing cadexomer iodine and nanocrystalline silver on the healing of leg ulcers. Wound Repair Regen. 2010 Jul-Aug;18(4):359-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2010.00603.x.
- Sibbald RG, Woo K, Ayello EA. Increased bacterial burden and infection: the story of NERDS and STONES. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2006 Oct;19(8):447-61; quiz 461-3. doi: 10.1097/00129334-200610000-00012.
- Wu YC, Kulbatski I, Medeiros PJ, Maeda A, Bu J, Xu L, Chen Y, DaCosta RS. Autofluorescence imaging device for real-time detection and tracking of pathogenic bacteria in a mouse skin wound model: preclinical feasibility studies. J Biomed Opt. 2014 Aug;19(8):085002. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.19.8.085002.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ANTICIPATED)
November 1, 2018
Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)
September 1, 2019
Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)
September 1, 2019
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
July 29, 2016
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 23, 2018
First Posted (ACTUAL)
May 4, 2018
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
May 4, 2018
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 23, 2018
Last Verified
April 1, 2018
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 16-187
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
IPD Plan Description
No sharing of data
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.