Comparison of 133Xe Scintigraphy With 19F MRI

July 23, 2018 updated by: Hal C Charles

Comparison of 133Xe Scintigraphy With 19F MRI for Evaluation of Lung Ventilation Function: A Non-Inferiority Comparison (DIAL1001007)

The central hypothesis and current observation is that PFx gases used as contrast agents readily provide functional images of the lung airways including important regional ventilation information such as ventilation defect severity and gas trapping. This is a pilot proof of concept study to demonstrate the non-inferiority of 19F MRI gas Ventilation imaging compared to 133Xe ventilation Scintigraphy in subjects with lung disease. The secondary goal of the study is to develop sufficient information to adequately power a pivotal trial of 19F MRI gas Ventilation imaging compared to 133Xe Ventilation Scintigraphy

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Conditions

Detailed Description

Aim 1: Compare measures of lung ventilation performance obtained using 133Xe Scintigraphy with performance using 19F Perfluorinated gas MRI using two independent readers.

133Xe Scintigraphy will be scored using the methods described in the statistics section and 19F images will be scored using the methods described in the statistics section. Scores for each subject will be earluated for consistency between readers and modalities. 60% concordance will be considered equivalent.

The outcomes of the work proposed is expected to show the non-inferiority of 19F Perfluorinated gas MRI to 133Xenon Scintigraphy

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Early Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27705
        • Duke University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Subjects must meet all of the following inclusion criteria to be eligible for enrollment into the trial

  1. Outpatients of either gender, age > 18.
  2. Willing and able to give informed consent and adhere to visit/protocol schedules. (Consent must be given before any study procedures are performed.)
  3. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test. This will be confirmed before participation in this investigational protocol.
  4. Completion of 133Xe ventilation scintigraphy after referral for ventilation imaging for any reason in Pro00081987 A Comparison of Technegas® and Xenon 133 Planar Lung Imaging in Subjects Referred for Ventilation Scintigraphy. The MRI will be accomplished in a timely fashion after the Scintigraphy study based on scheduling availability in the Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (CAMRD).

Exclusion Criteria:

Subjects presenting with any of the following will not be included in the trial:

1. Conditions that will prohibit MRI scanning (metal in eye, claustrophobia, inability to lie supine)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: OTHER
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficacy of 19F MRI compared to 133 Xenon Scintigraphy
Time Frame: 24 months
To evaluate the non-inferiority of 19F Perfluorinated gas MRI compared to 133 Xenon Scintigraphy ventilation imaging studies two readers will be selected as having experience reading Xe-133 ventilation scans. Readers will also receive training on interpretation of 19F ventilation images We note that the nature of the images both nuclear medicine and 19F MRI preclude blinding of the readers to the image modality. Images from each modality will be assessed independently and the images will be coded so that readers will not know which image set is from each subject.
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

April 4, 2018

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2019

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 18, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 9, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

May 22, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

July 24, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 23, 2018

Last Verified

July 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Pro00089045

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lung Diseases

Clinical Trials on Perfluorinated Gas/Oxygen Mixture

Subscribe