Effectiveness of Bilateral PTNS Compared to Unilateral PTNS for the Treatment of Overactive Bladder/Urge Incontinence (BUTTON)

April 6, 2025 updated by: Gnankang Sarah Napoe
This study is designed to evaluate whether bilateral Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation is more effective than unilateral Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation at treating overactive bladder and urge urinary incontinence

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) is an accepted treatment for overactive bladder that can be accomplished in the office with minimal side effects. It is currently carried out by stimulating one of the posterior tibial nerves unilaterally. The aim of this study is to determine whether bilateral percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation is more effective than unilateral stimulation. Patients with a diagnosis of overactive bladder who have previously failed lifestyle changes and/or pharmacologic therapy will be offered percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation. Enrolled patients will be randomized into two groups. The control group will receive the traditional unilateral treatment of PTNS. The intervention group will receive bilateral PTNS treatment. Intervention success will be measured by improvement in overactive bladder symptoms assessed by improvement in the scores on the overactive bladder questionnaire symptoms bother and decrease in number of voids, nocturia episodes and incontinence episodes as reported in the voiding diary

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

36

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15203
        • Gnankang Sarah Napoe
    • Rhode Island
      • Providence, Rhode Island, United States, 02905
        • WIHRI

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Female patients over the age of 18 who have previously tried and failed, or were unable to tolerate, behavioral therapy
  2. Patients who consent to participate in the study
  3. Patients on pharmacologic therapy at the time of recruitment can continue their treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnant patients
  2. Patients with pacemakers of implantable defibrillators
  3. Patients with neurogenic bladder
  4. Patients who have received Botox or have an implant for sacral nerve stimulation
  5. Patients with uncontrolled bleeding disorder
  6. Patients with unhealed ulcers or with leg edema surrounding medial malleolus

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Unilateral PTNS
34 gauge needle inserted 3cm above the medial ankle on the ankle, and cables are connected to the PTNS stimulator device. Stimulation is provided, per manufacturer directions, over a 30-minute treatment period
Use of PTNS on the ankle for 30 minutes
Experimental: Bilateral PTNS
34 gauge needle inserted 3cm above the medial ankle on both ankles, and cables are connected to the PTNS stimulator device. Stimulation is provided, per manufacturer directions, over a 30-minute treatment period
Use of PTNS on the ankle for 30 minutes

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire Score From Baseline to 12 Weeks or Last Measurement
Time Frame: 12 weeks or last measurement

Overactive Bladder questionnaire short form (OABqSF) symptom severity questionnaire was administered at baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks then 12 weeks. The OABqSF score ranges from 0 to 100. Those with more bothersome symptoms have higher scores.

The investigators expected more improvement in symptoms from participants receiving bilateral stimulation compared to those with unilateral stimulation.

12 weeks or last measurement

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Daily Number of Voids From Baseline to 12 Weeks or Last Measurement
Time Frame: 12 weeks or last measurement
The change in number of voids was obtained by comparing number of voids at 12 weeks or last measurement compared to baseline number of voids.
12 weeks or last measurement
Change in Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours From Baseline to 12 Weeks or Last Measurement
Time Frame: 12 weeks or last measurement
Change in number of incontinence episodes defined as number of incontinence episodes at completion of PTNS (12 weeks or last measurement) compared to baseline number of incontinence episodes.
12 weeks or last measurement
Change in Nocturia Episodes From Baseline to 12 Weeks or Last Measurement
Time Frame: 12 weeks or last measurement
Change in number of nocturia episodes defined as number of nighttime voids at completion of PTNS (12 weeks or last measurement) compared to baseline number of nighttime voids.
12 weeks or last measurement
Impact of Treatment on Quality of Life From Baseline to 12 Weeks or Last Measurement
Time Frame: 12 weeks or last measurement
The incontinence impact questionnaire was used to measure the impact on quality of life. The questionnaire score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating worse quality of life.
12 weeks or last measurement

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: G. Sarah Napoe, MD, University of Pittsburgh
  • Principal Investigator: Kyle Wohlrab, MD, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 17, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 8, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

September 8, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 8, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 22, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

May 24, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 15, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 6, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

No plan to share IPD

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Urinary Incontinence, Urge

Clinical Trials on PTNS

Subscribe