- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02177084
Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation in the Treatment of Anterior Resection Syndrome After Rectal Cancer Surgery
The study aims to evaluate the efficacy of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) associated with conservative therapy (arm A) for the treatment of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) compared with only conservative therapy (arm B).
The secondary aims are the evaluation of the following parameters:
- Effect of PTNS on manometric parameters
- Effect of PTNS on quality of life
- Effect of PTNS on the severity of fecal incontinence and / or obstructed defecation
- Safety of PTNS
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The study is a prospective randomized clinical trial that compares two treatments in patients with LARS:
Arm A: PTNS + conservative treatment (based on predominant symptom) Arm B: only conservative treatment
The study is divided into two phases:
PRETREATMENT PHASE
The patients with LARS score ≥ 21 after anterior resection of the rectum with sphincter-saving surgery for rectal cancer, will be submitted during the first visit of the study to :
- Collection of personal data
- Collection of medical records
- Collection of data relating to the intervention of anterior resection of the rectum
- Verification of the criteria for inclusion / exclusion
- Collection of informed consent
- Administration of the questionnaires European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life Questionnaire Cancer 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life Questionnaire Colorectal 38 (EORTC QLQ-CR38), Faecal incontinence severity index (FISI); Fecal incontinence quality of life questionnaire (FIQL), Obstructed defaecation syndrome (ODS) score questionnaire and Constipation-related quality of life questionnaire (CRQoL)
- Endoanal ultrasound
- Anorectal manometry
- PHASE OF TREATMENT During the treatment phase, data related to the treatment and any treatment related-complications will be recorded on a special form Bowel function and quality of life will be assessed using the same questionnaires at the end of treatment. Even anorectal manometry will be repeated at the end of treatment.
It is expected to enroll approximately 12 patients.
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Bologna, Italy, 40138
- S'Orsola Malpighi University Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with LARS score ≥ 21 after anterior resection of the rectum with sphincter-saving surgery for rectal cancer;
- Age> 18 years;
- Obtaining informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients carrying ostomy;
- Patients with clinical or radiological evidence of local or distant tumor recurrence;
- Patients suffering from neurological disorders;
- Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD);
- Patients who have a pacemaker or defibrillator;
- Patients taking antiplatelet agents or anticoagulants;
- Patients unable to follow the procedures of the Protocol or to provide informed consent.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: NONE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: PTNS + conservative treatment
PTNS consists in the insertion of a small electrode above the medial malleolus adjacent to the posterior tibial nerve. An adhesive surface electrode is placed under th arch of the foot. Both electrodes are connected to the neurostimulator that generates electricity. A neuromodulation session lasts 30 minutes. The treatment plan includes 12 weekly sessions, followed by two sessions at 2-week intervals and the last one after one month. Two additional sessions of reinforcement (top-up) are provided at intervals of 6 months or earlier in case of worsening of symptoms |
|
|
NO_INTERVENTION: conservative treatment
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
LARS score
Time Frame: 67 weeks
|
The primary end point is the evaluation of the results of the two interventions in functional terms, by comparing the LARS score calculated first at the end and after 12 months of treatment, according to the following classification:
|
67 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
EORTC QLQ-CR38
Time Frame: 67 weeks
|
Secondary objectives will be evaluated by the change of the questionnaires EORTC QLQ-CR38 performed before and after treatment.
|
67 weeks
|
|
EORTC QLQ-C30
Time Frame: 67 weeks
|
Secondary objectives will be evaluated by the change of the questionnaires EORTC QLQ-C30 performed before and after treatment
|
67 weeks
|
|
FISI
Time Frame: 67 weeks
|
Secondary objectives will be evaluated by the change of the questionnaires FISI examinations performed before and after treatment.
|
67 weeks
|
|
FIQL
Time Frame: 67 weeks
|
Secondary objectives will be evaluated by the change of the questionnaires FIQL performed before and after treatment.
|
67 weeks
|
|
ODS SCORE
Time Frame: 67 weeks
|
Secondary objectives will be evaluated by the change of the questionnaires ODS score performed before and after treatment.
|
67 weeks
|
|
CRQoL
Time Frame: 67 weeks
|
Secondary objectives will be evaluated by the change of the questionnaires CRQoL performed before and after treatment.
|
67 weeks
|
|
functional outcome
Time Frame: 67 weeks
|
Functional outcome will be evaluated comparing manometric examinations performed before and after treatment.
|
67 weeks
|
|
morbidity
Time Frame: 67 weeks
|
registration of complications after each therapy session
|
67 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- PTNS BO-01
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Low Anterior Resection Syndrome
-
Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Research InstituteNot yet recruitingLARS - Low Anterior Resection Syndrome
-
HEM Pharma Inc.Premier Research Group plcNot yet recruitingLARS - Low Anterior Resection Syndrome
-
University Hospital, BordeauxTerminatedLow Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS>20) | Refractory Medical Treatment After Rectal ResectionFrance
-
Innovacion en Cirugía VigoRecruitingLow Anterior Resection Syndrome | Rectal Disorders | Low Anterior ResectionSpain
-
University Hospital, AntwerpRecruitingRectal Adenocarcinoma | Total Mesorectal Excision | LARS - Low Anterior Resection Syndrome | Low Anterior Resection | Rectal ResectionBelgium
-
National Cancer Institute, LithuaniaVilnius UniversityCompletedLow Anterior Resection SyndromeLithuania
-
Ismail GögenurAarhus University Hospital; Hvidovre University HospitalActive, not recruitingLow Anterior Resection SyndromeDenmark
-
Mirna Abraham-NordlingCompletedLow Anterior Resection SyndromeSweden
-
Jewish General HospitalUniversity of Manitoba; McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute... and other collaboratorsCompletedLow Anterior Resection Syndrome | Rectal Cancer | Surgery | Patient Activation | Low Anterior ResectionUnited States, Canada
-
Seoul National University HospitalRecruitingLARS - Low Anterior Resection SyndromeKorea, Republic of
Clinical Trials on PTNS
-
Shengjing HospitalCompletedConstipation | Pelvic Floor Disorders | Childhood ALLChina
-
Gnankang Sarah NapoeTerminatedUrinary Incontinence, Urge | Overactive Bladder SyndromeUnited States
-
University of California, San DiegoCompletedOveractive Bladder SyndromeUnited States
-
University of Kansas Medical CenterCompleted
-
Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at...CompletedOveractive BladderUnited States
-
Cantonal Hospital of St. GallenCompletedFecal IncontinenceSwitzerland
-
London North West Healthcare NHS TrustCompletedPelvic Floor Disorders | Faecal Incontinence
-
Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode IslandCompleted
-
Region SkaneNot yet recruitingFissure in AnoSweden
-
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustUnknown