Exclusion of Non-involved Uterus From the Target Volume in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer (EXIT)

December 16, 2022 updated by: University Hospital, Ghent

Exclusion of Non-involved Uterus Form the Target Volume: an Individualized Treatment for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Using Modern Radiotherapy and Imaging Techniques

Both toxicity and local relapse are major concerns in the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer. The purpose of this study is to ameliorate both by integrating modern imaging (diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging; DW-MRI) into the treatment planning of modern radiotherapy. We want to evaluate the safety and effect of excluding the unaffected uterus (as determined on magnetic resonance imaging) from the treatment field. Meanwhile we want to explore the possible use of apparent diffusion coefficient values (DW-MRI) as biomarker of treatment response.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

In our previous research we successfully implemented Intensity Modulate Arc Therapy with concurrent administration of cisplatin 40mg/m2 weekly (IMAT-C) in the multimodality treatment of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer (LACC) . By delivering a higher biological dose to the tumor and lowering the dose to the Organs at Risk (OARs), toxicity significantly dropped and local control improved. However, there remains room for improvement for both toxicity and response to the treatment. Macroscopic tumor rest on hysterectomy reflects the existence of chemoradiation (CRT) resistant foci and correlates with outcome. We hypothesize that both radiotherapy (RT)-related toxicity (a) as well as local response on CRT (b) can be improved by respectively:

  1. Reducing the dose on OARs by omitting iconographical non tumor-bearing parts of the uterus from the Clinical Target Volume (CTV).
  2. Performing a dose-escalation to those regions within the gross target volume (GTV) pointed out by Diffusion Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DW-MRI) to be at risk for treatment failure.

To objectivize our hypotheses, we aim at:

  1. Demonstrating that omitting iconographical unaffected uterus from the treatment volume leaves no tumor behind in the non-targeted parts of the uterus, leads to lower doses to the OARs and decreases (acute) toxicity.
  2. Validating that a high baseline apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and an increase in ADC 2 weeks after start of CRT, for the whole tumor as well as for intra-tumoral regions, is prognostic for residual tumor on hysterectomy specimen and to consider the possibility for a further dose-escalation on tumors/intratumoral regions at risk for treatment failure.

Importance to the field: Both toxicity and local relapse are major concerns in the treatment of LACC. Grade ≥ 2 toxicity influences daily life of patients significantly and is present in the majority of patients treated and even with image guided BT local relapse remains the major cause of treatment failure.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

21

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Gent, Belgium, 9000
        • Radiotherapy Department Ghent University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Biopsy proven carcinoma of the uterine cervix
  • locally advanced disease (FIGO IB2 or >FIGO IIB or node positive) proven by clinical examination, 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scan (18FDG PET-CT) and MRI
  • no more than 2 distant metastases (other than para-aortic lymph nodes);
  • WHO 0-2;
  • adequate kidney function for CRT, if inadequate kidney function radiotherapy can be the sole therapeutic regimen;
  • not pregnant or breastfeeding
  • absence of any psychological, familial, sociological or geographical condition potentially hampering compliance with the study protocol and follow-up schedule; - willing and able to sign a written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients unable to undergo MRI for any reason.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: treatment with EXIT-target volume
The radiotherapeutic treatment plan is based on an EXIT-target volume in which the non-involved uterus is excluded from the target volume. All other delineations are performed conform standard of care.
exclusion of the unaffected part of the uterus out of the treatment field

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
safety: abscence of tumor in the non-involved and non-high doses irradiated part of the uterus
Time Frame: within 3 months after last inclusion
abscence of tumor in the non-involved (as determined on the pre-treatment MRI) and non-high doses irradiated part of the uterus in the hysterectomy specimen after CRT
within 3 months after last inclusion

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
dosimetry
Time Frame: within 3 months after last inclusion
dosimetric comparison of dose on the OARs when comparing study treatment plans compared to treatment of the whole uterus at high doses
within 3 months after last inclusion
number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by the radiotherapy oncology group toxicity criteria and CTCAEv4.0 for hematology
Time Frame: during treatment. 10 days, 1 months and 3 months after ending treatment
evaluation of acute toxicity, grade 0 (no toxicity) to grade 5 (treatment related death).
during treatment. 10 days, 1 months and 3 months after ending treatment
number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by the radiotherapy oncology group toxicity criteria and CTCAEv4.0
Time Frame: 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after treatment.
evaluation chronic toxicity, grade 0 (no toxicity) to grade 5 (treatment related death).
6, 12, 18 and 24 months after treatment.
local, regional and distant control
Time Frame: 1, 3, 6, 12,18 and 24 months after treatment
defined as absence of disease at the primary tumor bed, the regional lymph nodes and distant sites
1, 3, 6, 12,18 and 24 months after treatment
Correlation of high-Risk regions on IMaging (DW-MRI) with Pathology and regression pattern analysis (CRIMP).
Time Frame: Within 6 months after surgery of the last patient
The MRI at fixed time points will be supplemented with diffusion weighing (DW). The ultimate aim is the correlation of tumoral ADC-values of the different DW-MRI with the pathology in order to predict therapy resistance or response to CRT at an early stage or even before start.
Within 6 months after surgery of the last patient

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Katrien Vandecasteele, MD, PhD, University Hospital, Ghent

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 30, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 22, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

September 22, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 3, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

May 31, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 19, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 16, 2022

Last Verified

December 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

IPD Plan Description

IPD can be shared. Decision is made upon request.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Uterine Cervical Neoplasms

Clinical Trials on treatment with EXIT-target volume

3
Subscribe