Mechanisms of Treatment Change in Panic Disorder and Agoraphobia

April 29, 2020 updated by: Heather McClary, Southern Methodist University

Moderators and Mediators of Treatment Change in Panic Disorder and Agoraphobia

The primary goal of the present study is to identify mechanisms of therapeutic change of two theoretically contrasting therapeutic procedures: The first phase consists of comparing the outcome of the capnometry-assisted breathing therapy (BRT) with cognitive restructuring (CT). During the second phase participants of both interventions will undergo in-vivo exposure.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The primary goal of the present study is to identify mechanisms of therapeutic change of two theoretically contrasting therapeutic procedures: While the rationale of breathing training is based on the assumption that hypocapnea (lower than normal levels of pCO2) is responsible for the development and maintenance of panic disorder, the rationale of cognitive interventions is that the primary mechanism in PD is the cognitive misinterpretation of benign bodily sensations. Further, while breathing training should induce a low-anxiety state (through parasympathetic activation) and, therefore, facilitate habituation to fearful situations, voluntary increases in arousal through hyperventilation (sympathetic activation) has been suggested to facilitate cognitive restructuring during exposure.

In order to study mechanisms that potentially produce clinical improvement, the investigators propose a 2-phase therapeutic intervention: The first phase consists of comparing the outcome of the capnometry-assisted respiratory training (CART) with cognitive restructuring (CT). During the second phase participants of both interventions will undergo in-vivo exposure therapy.

With the data collected from the study, the investigators will test the following hypotheses: (a) CART will produce more reduction in psycho-physiologically relevant measures of panic symptoms compared to CT, while cognitive restructuring will produce more reduction in cognitive parameters of panic symptoms; (b) CART will influence the response to voluntary hyperventilation tests by leading to faster recovery compared to CT. Improvement in respiratory psychophysiology will be correlated with improvement in panic symptom severity; (c) Breathing techniques during exposure will lead to a lower-anxiety state, facilitating but not inhibiting fear extinction as suggested by the safety aid theory

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

41

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75205
        • Southern Methodist University, Department of Psychology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 63 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • A current DSM-IV diagnosis of panic disorder with agoraphobia that is designated by the patient as the most important source of current distress
  • Patients must be willing to engage in exposure to fearful situations and sensations

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A history of bipolar disorder, psychosis or delusional disorders, current substance abuse or dependence

Medical Exclusion Factors:

  • Patients with severe unstable medical illness, or serious medical illness for which hospitalization may be likely within the next three months
  • Patients with a history of seizures, angina, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, clinically significant arrhythmias, transient ischemic attacks, cerebrovascular accidents, diabetes mellitus, significant asthma, emphysema, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Cognitive Therapy
The training included four components: (a) educating patients about exacerbating panic symptoms through catastrophic thoughts (vicious cycle), (b) identifying negative cognitions associated with physical sensation triggers of recent panic attacks, (c) practicing replacement of maladaptive cognitions with non catastrophic explanations, and (d) instructing patients in between session exercises during Phase I.
The training included four components: (a) educating patients about exacerbating panic symptoms through catastrophic thoughts (vicious cycle), (b) identifying negative cognitions associated with physical sensation triggers of recent panic attacks, (c) practicing replacement of maladaptive cognitions with non catastrophic explanations, and (d) instructing patients in between session exercises during Phase I.
Other Names:
  • CT
Active Comparator: Capnometry-Assisted Respiratory Training
The training included four components: (a) educating patients about the exacerbation of panic symptoms through hypocapnia; (b) directing patients' attention to potentially detrimental respiratory patterns; (c) teaching patients techniques to control their respiration, in particular end-tidal PCO2; and (d) instructing patients in between-session exercises. Between-session exercises using a portable capnometer were to be performed twice a day for 17 min at home or elsewhere during Phase I.
The training included four components: (a) educating patients about the exacerbation of panic symptoms through hypocapnia; (b) directing patients' attention to potentially detrimental respiratory patterns; (c) teaching patients techniques to control their respiration, in particular end-tidal PCO2; and (d) instructing patients in between-session exercises. Between-session exercises using a portable capnometer were to be performed twice a day for 17 min at home or elsewhere during Phase I.
Other Names:
  • CART
Other: In-vivo exposure therapy
In this two-phase intervention, patients were randomized (within each site) to first receive five individual, weekly, 1-hr sessions of respiratory skill training (CART) or cognitive skill training (CT; Phase I, Skill Acquisition Training), followed by three weekly sessions of in-vivo exposure (Phase II, Application Training) plus a fourth session at 2-month follow-up.
In this two-phase intervention, patients were randomized (within each site) to first receive five individual, weekly, 1-hr sessions of respiratory skill training (CART) or cognitive skill training (CT; Phase I, Skill Acquisition Training), followed by three weekly sessions of in-vivo exposure (Phase II, Application Training) plus a fourth session at 2-month follow-up.
Other Names:
  • EXP

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in panic symptom severity assessed by the Panic Disorder Severity Scale/CGI
Time Frame: Pre (Week 0), Mid (Week 5), Post (Week 9), Follow-Up (Week 17)
Clinician administered; 7 items rated on 0 - 4 scale; scores over 9 suggest the need for formal diagnostic assessment
Pre (Week 0), Mid (Week 5), Post (Week 9), Follow-Up (Week 17)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cortisol assessments collecting 8 saliva samples per day
Time Frame: Phase II (Weeks 7 - 9)
was administered to subset of patients for exposure and non exposure days
Phase II (Weeks 7 - 9)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Alicia E Meuret, Ph.D., Southern Methodist University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2004

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 1, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 23, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

June 6, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 1, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 29, 2020

Last Verified

April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MEUA-2005

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

Data is available upon request

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Panic Disorder With Agoraphobia

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Therapy

3
Subscribe