Prevention of Atelectasis, Via High Flow Nasal Cannula to Obtain a PEP, During General Anesthesia in Children (PREVAT-PED)

Prevention of Atelectasis, Via High Flow Nasal Cannula to Obtain a PEP, During General Anesthesia for MRI by Sevoflurane in Children, Evaluated by Lung MRI and Echography

Anesthesia causes respiratory changes and complications, which are the main causes of complications and anesthesia-related deaths.

Among the complications, the rapid appearance of lung atelectasis is well known, deteriorating the hematosis during anesthesia, and inducing secondary pulmonary complications.

Prevention or limitation of the atelectasis would be a way to improve the safety of patients who have a limited respiratory function.

The application of a positive expiratory pressure (PEP) is an effective prevention method for atelectasis, that have been only demonstrate in patients under mechanical ventilation.

The high flow nasal cannula is a non-invasive technique easy to perform and allowing a PEP. High flow nasal cannula is safe to use, and the interface is free from local skin complications.

Chest X-ray (bad sensibility) or CT are usually used for the diagnosis of atelectasis, but these two exams involve irradiation for patient. MRI and pulmonary ultrasonography has now been validated in adults. MRI are relatively long, and allow to investigate the atelectasis with only a short additional acquisition time.

Thus, it would be the first study on the effect of the PEP on the impact and the volume of the atelectasis during general anesthesia in spontaneous ventilation in children. By the way this is the first study on lung's anatomical effects of high flow nasal cannula.

It is a monocentric, intervention, randomized, superiority study whose main purpose is to show the reduction of the atelectasis through the use of high flow nasal cannula versus a high concentration mask for pediatric anesthesia during MRI.

The studied population is all the children between 6 months and 5 years with a pediatric indication of general anesthesia for MRI.

The primary goal is to show a reduction of volume (cm3) of the atelectasis via the application of a PEP by high flow nasal cannula.

The main assessment criteria is the ratio of atelectasis volume/total lung volume.

The prevalence of the atelectasis will be evaluated by MRI lung and measured using 3D reconstruction software. The duration of the examination and the anesthesia is slighty lengthened, 3 to 5 minutes for a 40 minutes' exam.

The secondary objective is to show a match between the atelectasis on MRI and ultrasound.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Anesthesia causes respiratory changes and complications, which are the main causes of complications and anesthesia-related deaths.

Among the complications, the rapid appearance of lung atelectasis is well known, deteriorating the hematosis during anesthesia, and inducing secondary pulmonary complications.

Prevention or limitation of the atelectasis would be a way to improve the safety of patients who have a limited respiratory function.

The application of a positive expiratory pressure (PEP) is an effective prevention method for atelectasis, that has been demonstrated only in patients under mechanical ventilation.

The high flow nasal cannula is a non-invasive technique easy to perform and allowing a PEP. High flow nasal cannula is safe to use, and the interface is free from local skin complications.

Chest X-ray (bad sensibility) or CT are usually used for the diagnosis of atelectasis, but these two exams involve irradiation for patient. MRI and pulmonary ultrasonography has now been validated in adults. The investigators has a long experience of anesthesia in spontaneous ventilation in children for MRI. MRI are relatively long, and allow to investigate the atelectasis with only a short additional acquisition time.

Thus, it would be the first study on the effect of the PEP on the impact and the volume of the atelectasis during general anesthesia in spontaneous ventilation in children. By the way this is the first study on lung's anatomical effects of high flow nasal cannula.

It is a monocentric, intervention, randomized, superiority study whose main purpose is to show the reduction of the atelectasis through the use of high flow nasal cannula versus a high concentration mask for pediatric anesthesia during MRI.

The studied population is all the children between 6 months and 5 years with a pediatric indication of general anesthesia for MRI.

The primary goal is to show a reduction of volume (cm3) of the atelectasis via the application of a PEP by high flow nasal cannula.

The main assessment criteria is the ratio of atelectasis volume/total lung volume.

The prevalence of the atelectasis will be evaluated by MRI lung and measured using 3D reconstruction software. The duration of the examination and the anesthesia is slighty lengthened, 3 to 5 minutes for a 40 minutes' exam.

The secondary objective is to show a match between the atelectasis on MRI and ultrasound.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

42

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Paca
      • Marseille, Paca, France, 13005
        • Assistance Publique Des Hopitaux de Marseille

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 months to 5 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Indication of general anesthesia for MRI
  • Patient between 6 months and 5 years old
  • ASA score I or II
  • No facial dysmorphia
  • No predicting difficult intubation
  • Parental consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe cardio-pulmonary disease
  • Lack of coverage by health insurance
  • ASA III or IV
  • Parental refuse for inclusion

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: control group
standard general anesthesia using sevoflurane delivered by a pediatric high concentration mask
Experimental: Intervention group
sevoflurane will be deliver by a pediatric high flow nasal canula (2L/KG/min)
high flow nasal canula to obtain a positive expiratory pressure

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
atelectasis volume by Lung MRI
Time Frame: 40 minutes

volume (cm3) of the total lung.

The main assessment criteria is the ratio of atelectasis volume/total lung volume.

The prevalence of the atelectasis will be evaluated by MRI lung and measured using 3D reconstruction software.

40 minutes
total lung volume by Lung MRI
Time Frame: 40 minutes

volume (cm3) of the atelectasis via the application of a PEP by high flow nasal cannula.

The main assessment criteria is the ratio of atelectasis volume/total lung volume.

The prevalence of the atelectasis will be evaluated by MRI lung and measured using 3D reconstruction software.

40 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
atelectasis volume by lung ultrasonography
Time Frame: 15 to 45 minutes after begining general anesthesia
Lung ultrasonography will be pratice in recovery room, just after the MRI. The Lung ultrasonography score will be collected.
15 to 45 minutes after begining general anesthesia

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: EMILIE GARRIDO PRADALIE, APHM

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 10, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 27, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

March 27, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 26, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 18, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

July 19, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

June 4, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 3, 2024

Last Verified

June 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2017-39 (CPP)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Atelectasis

Clinical Trials on high flow nasal canula

Subscribe