High Flow Oxygen Therapy Effect on Healthy Subjects

October 11, 2023 updated by: Gustavo Plotnikow, Argentinian Intensive Care Society

Impact of High Flow Oxygen Therapy on Diaphragm Thickening Fraction in Healthy Subjects. A Prospective Cohort Study

The use of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) has increased. Diaphragmatic ultrasonography is a tool that, as a noninvasive complement to esophageal pressure (Pes) measurement, allows the evaluation of diaphragm function and reflects, through the diaphragm thickening fraction (DTf), the magnitude of diaphragmatic fiber recruitment. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of HFNC therapy on the DTf in healthy subjects. Second, this study aimed to assess the behavior of the respiratory rate (RR) and the work of breathing in these subjects.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

13

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Buenos Aires
      • Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 1280AED
        • Hospital Britanico de Buenos Aires

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • healthy subjects over 18 years old

Exclusion Criteria:

  • contraindication for esophageal balloon placement
  • diagnosis of lung disease
  • smokers

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Single

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diaphragm thickening fraction.
Time Frame: Immediately after 5 min of each condition (baseline, 20 and 40 liters per minute) the diaphragmatic thickness was measured at the end of inspiration y de la expiration during 3 consecutive respiratory cycles (each cycle is between 3 and 10 seconds)

ultrasound measurements were performed by an expert operator (the same in all cases). The ultrasound measurement was performed using a high-resolution linear transducer in real-time in B-mode.

The diaphragm thickness was measured at the end of expiration and the end of inspiration of the same ventilatory cycle and the average value of 3 ventilatory cycles was recorded. A 2-minute washout period was allowed between each test condition to avoid the summation of effects.

The DTf and PTPes/min were calculated for each subject in each available condition (baseline - without flow- , wtih 20 and 40 liters per minute):

DTf = End Inspiratory Diaphragm thickening - End Expiratory Diaphragm thickening / End Expiratory Diaphragm thickening x 100

Immediately after 5 min of each condition (baseline, 20 and 40 liters per minute) the diaphragmatic thickness was measured at the end of inspiration y de la expiration during 3 consecutive respiratory cycles (each cycle is between 3 and 10 seconds)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Respiratory Rate
Time Frame: The number of breaths per minute was recorded in 60 seconds.
The number of breaths per minute was recorded in 60 seconds.
The number of breaths per minute was recorded in 60 seconds.
Esophageal pressure swing (Pes).
Time Frame: 5 minutes each condition
Difference between basal Pes and maximum inspiratory Pes deflection.
5 minutes each condition
Esophageal pressure-time product per minute (PTPes/min).
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 24 weeks
It was calculated as the area determined by esophageal deflection multiplied by respiratory rate. An ad hoc software developed in MATLAB R2018b (The MathWorks, Inc. Massachusetts, United States) was used for this purpose.
Through study completion, an average of 24 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Gustavo A Plotnikow, RT, Hospital Britanico de Buenos Aires

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 30, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 29, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 11, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

October 17, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 17, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 11, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy Volunteers

Clinical Trials on High flow nasal canula

Subscribe