Prodromal Markers of First-degree Relatives of Patients With Psychiatric Disorders Comorbid With RBD

October 26, 2022 updated by: Professor Wing Yun Kwok, Chinese University of Hong Kong

Prodromal Markers of α-synucleinopathy Neurodegeneration in the First-degree Relatives of Patients With Psychiatric Disorders Comorbid With REM Sleep Behavior Disorder

REM sleep behavior disorder (typical or 'idiopathic' RBD, iRBD) is a novel and distinct parasomnia characterized by recurrent dream enactment behaviours and polysomnographic features of loss of normal REM-sleep related muscle atonia, with a male predominance commonly occurring at the age of 60's. A majority of the patients with iRBD will eventually develop α-synucleinopathy (e.g., Parkinson's disease). On the other hand, growing evidence reveals a specific group of psychiatric patients demonstrating comparable clinical RBD features (pRBD) (e.g., abnormal REM-related electromyographic (EMG) activities) as found in typical iRBD, but with less male predominance occurring at the age of mid 40's to early 50's. Although recent findings from both cross-sectional and prospective studies have suggested that pRBD is likely to be a persistent parasomnia with close association with clinical and neuroimaging biomarkers related to neurodegeneration, the nosology of the development of RBD symptoms among patients with psychiatric disorders, notably major depressive disorder, remains unclear as to whether they are simply antidepressants related, or represent a part of the early phase of α-synucleinopathy neurodegeneration. Family studies on iRBD have confirmed a significant familial aggregation of iRBD with a higher rate of RBD cases and presence of prodromal neurodegenerative biomarkers (e.g. tonic EMG activity during REM sleep, constipation, and motor function impairments) of α-synucleinopathy neurodegeneration among first-degree relatives (FDRs) of patients with iRBD. Thus, the investigators propose this family study to examine the following hypotheses: 1) FDRs of patients with pRBD have a higher rate of RBD symptoms and its core features when compared to FDRs of controls with and without psychiatric disorders; 2) FDRs of pRBD are more likely to exhibit the features associated with prodromal markers of α-synucleinopathy neurodegeneration when compared with FDRs of controls with and without psychiatric disorders; 3) FDRs of patients with pRBD have a higher rate of α-synucleinopathy neurodegeneration when compared with FDRs of controls with and without psychiatric disorders. A total of 176 FDRs from each group (e.g., pRBD cases, psychiatric controls, and healthy controls) will be recruited to undergo a face-to-face clinical interview and a series of assessments on prodromal markers of Parkinson's diseases (as according to the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society research criteria) respectively.

All FDRs with possible RBD and a subset of FDRs without possible RBD will be invited to undergo one-night video-polysomnographic assessment to confirm the clinical diagnosis of RBD and to assess the abnormal REM-related EMG muscle activities.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD) is a novel REM sleep parasomnia characterized by dream enacting behaviors and sleep-related injuries. Ample evidences have suggested that idiopathic RBD (iRBD) is a precursor of α-synucleinopathy neurodegeneration (e.g. Parkinson's disease, PD) in which dopamine dysfunction is one of the core pathophysiologies. In recent decade, our group has identified a cohort of patients with psychiatric disorders (mainly major depressive disorder, MDD) comorbid with RBD (pRBD). While there was a postulation that RBD symptoms in this psychiatric population may simply be side effects of antidepressant medication (by enhancing REM-sleep related muscle activity), accumulating evidence from case-control and prospective cohort studies suggested that pRBD is only partially explained by antidepressant usage and is better considered as a variant of typical iRBD in terms of comparable clinical presentation with typical iRBD and its close association with neurodegenerative markers. Nonetheless, more evidence is needed to substantiate that pRBD is a distinct diagnostic entity rather than a symptom secondary to antidepressant use. In this study, the investigators will employ genetic epidemiology approach to: 1) determine the familial genetic contribution; 2) search for biomarkers and endophenotypes; and 3) validate the diagnostic entity of a disease.

This proposed study will enrich the limited scientific literature of the potential pathogenesis of pRBD and its relationship with α-synucleinopathy. In addition, the understanding of psychiatric disorders, notably MDD, is often limited by its heterogeneity. Our proposed study will, by determining the familial aggregation of pRBD, help us to identify certain subtype of the psychiatric populations who may likely harbour an underlying neurodegenerative basis. By using a family study design, a number of important aspects with regard to the pathogenesis of pRBD will be answered. First, if first-degree relatives (FDRs) of patients with pRBD have a higher rate of possible RBD or clinical diagnosis of RBD (as confirmed by video-polysomnography) as well as the presence of neurodegenerative diseases when compared with FDRs of controls, it will substantiate the argument that pRBD is not merely a side effect of antidepressants but rather harbouring a familial and genetic predisposition to RBD and, ultimately α-synucleinopathy neurodegeneration. Second, the determination of biomarkers of neurodegeneration among unaffected FDRs of patients with pRBD will also help to identify high-risk individuals for clinical intervention and prevention. Third, the calculation of heritability will help to delineate to which extent the additive genetic contribution is responsible for the variance of pRBD phenotypes. Finally, the findings from this proposed study will be compared with our on-going family study of typical iRBD to determine the extent to which iRBD and pRBD are similar or different to each other in terms of genetic and familial associations.

In this proposed study, the investigators hypothesize that:

  1. FDRs of patients with pRBD have a higher rate of RBD symptoms and its core features compared with FDRs of controls;
  2. The unaffected FDRs of patients with pRBD are more likely to exhibit the features associated with prodromal markers of Parkinson's disease compared with FDRs of controls;
  3. FDRs of patients with pRBD have a higher rate of Parkinson's disease (and other α-synucleinopathy neurodegeneration) compared with FDRs of controls.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

408

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • The Chinese University of Hong Kong
      • Shatin, Hong Kong
        • Shatin Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

In this study, we will employ a combination of family history (proxy report for unavailable/inaccessible subjects) and study (face-to face interview, clinical and sleep study) method in determining the familial aggregation of pRBD. The flowchart of subject recruitments is presented in Figure 1. The study subjects are the FDRs of pRBD cases, psychiatric controls and healthy controls. As previous studies have suggested that depression is a significant risk factor of development of Parkinson's Disease, we will include two control groups. First, those FDRs of patients with psychiatric disorders in addition to the FDRs of healthy controls (free of depression and RBD), in consideration of the potential associations of proband's psychiatric disorders with prodromal markers of Parkinson's Disease in the FDRs.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age- and sex- matched with pRBD proband;
  • Without lifetime psychiatric disorder according to Structural Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Disorders (SCID);
  • Free of narcolepsy and other neurological diseases;
  • Absence of any RBD features as based on RBDQ-HK and v-PSG;
  • free of neurodegenerative diseases.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not Chinese or aged under 40 years old;
  • Refuse to participate in this study;
  • without a biological relationship with proband.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Family-Based
  • Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Psychiatric RBD cases
  1. Presence of REM sleep without atonia;
  2. At least one of the followings is present: i). Dream enactment behaviors, SRIs, potentially injurious or disruptive behaviors by history; ii). Abnormal REM sleep behaviors documented during v-PSG monitoring;
  3. Absence of electroencephalogram (EEG) epileptiform activity during REM sleep unless RBD can be clearly distinguished from any concurrent REM sleep related seizure disorder;
  4. The sleep disturbance is not better explained by other sleep disorder (e.g., obstructive sleep apnea, medical or neurological disorder, mental disorder, medication use, or substance use disorder)
Psychiatric control
  1. Age- and sex- matched with pRBD proband;
  2. Concurrent psychiatric illnesses according to the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview( M.I.N.I);
  3. Free of narcolepsy and other neurological diseases;
  4. Absence of any RBD features as based on REM sleep behavior disorder questionnaire (RBDQ-HK) and v-PSG; 5) Free of neurodegenerative diseases
Healthy control
  1. Age- and sex- matched with pRBD proband;
  2. Without lifetime psychiatric disorder according to Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview( M.I.N.I);
  3. Free of narcolepsy and other neurological diseases;
  4. Absence of any RBD features as based on RBDQ-HK and v-PSG;
  5. Free of neurodegenerative diseases

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Prevalence of possible REM Sleep Behavior Disorder
Time Frame: 17 months
The prevalence of possible REM Sleep Behavior Disorder based on the self-reported/proxy-reported REM Sleep Behavior Disorder symptoms in REM Sleep Behavior Disorder Questionnaire-HK among First Degree Relatives,
17 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of REM-related EMG activity
Time Frame: 17 months
The mean differences in the percentage of REM-related EMG activity among First Degree Relatives in different groups
17 months
Weighted prevalence of Polysomnography confirmed REM Sleep Behavior Disorder
Time Frame: 17 months
Prevalence of Polysomnography confirmed REM Sleep Behavior Disorder according to ICSD-3 criteria among First Degree Relatives in different groups
17 months
Recurrence risk of Parkinson's disease
Time Frame: 17 months
Risk of Parkinson's disease and other α-synucleinopathy neurodegeneration based on family history report and face-to-face interview among First Degree Relatives in different groups
17 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Yun Kwok Wing, Professor, Chinese University of Hong Kong

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 12, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 12, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

July 23, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 28, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 26, 2022

Last Verified

October 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

IPD Plan Description

In this stage, the investigators didn't decide which information of IPD will share with other researchers

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on REM Sleep Behavior Disorder

Subscribe