Executive Function Training in Childhood Obesity: Food Choice, Quality of Life and Brain Connectivity (TOuCH)

April 28, 2021 updated by: María Ángeles Jurado Luque, University of Barcelona
This study evaluates if executive function training in obese children can improve food-related choices and produce cognitive and neuroimaging changes, but also improve psychological and physical status and quality of life measures.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Based on the limited success of current behavioural weight-loss programmes and coupled with data on executive function deficiencies in obesity, this study aims to explore the impact of executive function training on food-related choices, cognitive and neuroimaging outcomes, but also on the psychological and physical status and quality of life measures.

The specific hypotheses are:

  1. Obese children undergoing the training programme will perform better than those receiving the control programme in cognitive, emotional state, physical activity and quality of life measures at the end of the intervention and follow-up at 12 months.
  2. Obese children receiving the training programme will take better food-related decisions at the end of the intervention and follow-up at 12 months.
  3. Obese children receiving the training programme will show changes in brain connectivity, which will be observable immediately at the end of the intervention and during the follow up period at 12 months.
  4. There will be an association between changes in neuroimaging biomarkers and food choice, cognitive, emotional, physical and quality of life outcomes in individuals receiving training.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

46

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Barcelona, Spain, 08035
        • Neuroscience Institute. Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

7 years to 10 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Being obese according to the criteria by Cole et al., (2000)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Neurological, psychiatric or developmental disorder.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental
Children in the training group must complete home-based executive function training by iPad. At the same time, they are asked to learn basic psychoeducational contents and send pictures of their daily meals. Furthermore, physical activity and sleep patterns are registered over the training period.
Home-based executive function training with adaptive difficulty, through Cogmed and Cognifit systems over 6 weeks (30-45 minuts/day, 5 days per week). Cognitive training will consist on working memory training (Cogmed, www.cogmed.com) and executive/inhibitory function training (Cognifit, www.cognifit.com).
Learning basic healthy habits through daily Prezi presentations that include healthy food recommendations, funny receipts to families, ideas for exercising, emotion and behavioral management strategies, etc.
Active Comparator: Placebo non-adaptive training
Children in the control group must complete cognitive control tasks. They are also asked to learn basic psychoeducational contents and send pictures of their daily meals. Furthermore, physical activity and sleep patterns are registered over the training period.
Learning basic healthy habits through daily Prezi presentations that include healthy food recommendations, funny receipts to families, ideas for exercising, emotion and behavioral management strategies, etc.
Executive function training with non-adaptive difficulty through Cognifit system over 6 weeks (30-45 minuts/day, 5 days per week). Exercices will be the same as the ones in the experimental group but minimizing the executive/working memory component and without incresing difficulty.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline estimated verbal intelligence quotient (IQ) at 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline (T0; 1 week before intervention); follow-up (T2; 12 months after intervention finished)
Vocabulary subtest (Wechsler intelligence scale for children - Fifth edition, WISC-V). 29 items. Each item is scored 0 or 1 (0=incorrect; 1=correct), yielding a total between 0 and 54.
Baseline (T0; 1 week before intervention); follow-up (T2; 12 months after intervention finished)
Change from baseline estimated visuospatial intelligence quotient (IQ) at 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline (T0; 1 week before intervention); follow-up (T2; 12 months after intervention finished)
Matrix Reasoning subtest (WISC- V). 32 items. Each item is scored 0 or 1 (0=incorrect; 1=correct), yielding a total between 0 and 32.
Baseline (T0; 1 week before intervention); follow-up (T2; 12 months after intervention finished)
Change from baseline immediate verbal attention at 8 weeks and at 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline (T0; 1 week before intervention); postraining (T1; 1 week after intervention); follow-up (T2; 12 months after intervention finished)
Forward Digit Span (WISC-V). 9 items. Each item is scored 0 or 1 (0=incorrect; 1=correct), yielding a total between 0 and 18.
Baseline (T0; 1 week before intervention); postraining (T1; 1 week after intervention); follow-up (T2; 12 months after intervention finished)
Change from baseline immediate visuospatial attention at 8 weeks and at 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline (T0; 1 week before intervention); postraining (T1; 1 week after intervention); follow-up (T2; 12 months after intervention finished)
Forward Spatial Span (Wechsler Nonverbal Scale of Ability; WNV). 8 items. Each item is scored 0 or 1 (0=incorrect; 1=correct), yielding a total between 0 and 16.
Baseline (T0; 1 week before intervention); postraining (T1; 1 week after intervention); follow-up (T2; 12 months after intervention finished)
Change from baseline speed and selective verbal attention at 8 weeks and at 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline (T0; 1 week before intervention); postraining (T1; 1 week after intervention); follow-up (T2; 12 months after intervention finished)
Reading and counting (Five Digits Test). Total expended time.
Baseline (T0; 1 week before intervention); postraining (T1; 1 week after intervention); follow-up (T2; 12 months after intervention finished)
Change from baseline speed and selective visual attention at 8 weeks and at 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline (T0; 1 week before intervention); postraining (T1; 1 week after intervention); follow-up (T2; 12 months after intervention finished)
Children Color Trail Test - I. Total expended time.
Baseline (T0; 1 week before intervention); postraining (T1; 1 week after intervention); follow-up (T2; 12 months after intervention finished)
Change from baseline sustained visual attention at 8 weeks and at 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline (T0; 1 week before intervention); postraining (T1; 1 week after intervention); follow-up (T2; 12 months after intervention finished)
Continuous Performance Test -III. Detectability: number of correct responses to non-targets (i.e., the letter X) and to targets (i.e., all other letters). Omissions: number of failures to respond to targets. Comissions: number of incorrect responses to non-targets. Perseverations: number of random or anticipatory responses.
Baseline (T0; 1 week before intervention); postraining (T1; 1 week after intervention); follow-up (T2; 12 months after intervention finished)
Change from baseline verbal digit working memory at 8 weeks and at 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline (T0; 1 week before intervention); postraining (T1; 1 week after intervention); follow-up (T2; 12 months after intervention finished)
Backward Digit Span (WISC-V). 9 items. Each item is scored 0 or 1 (0=incorrect; 1=correct), yielding a total between 0 and 18.
Baseline (T0; 1 week before intervention); postraining (T1; 1 week after intervention); follow-up (T2; 12 months after intervention finished)
Change from baseline visuospatial working memory at 8 weeks and at 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline (T0; 1 week before intervention); postraining (T1; 1 week after intervention); follow-up (T2; 12 months after intervention finished)
Backward Spatial Span (WNV). 8 items. Each item is scored 0 or 1 (0=incorrect; 1=correct), yielding a total between 0 and 16.
Baseline (T0; 1 week before intervention); postraining (T1; 1 week after intervention); follow-up (T2; 12 months after intervention finished)
Change from baseline verbal working memory at 8 weeks and at 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline (T0; 1 week before intervention); postraining (T1; 1 week after intervention); follow-up (T2; 12 months after intervention finished)
N-back. It consists of indicating when the current stimulus matches the one from n steps earlier in the sequence. The load factor n can be adjusted (0-1-2-3). Correct responses : number of correct responses to targets. Omissions: number of failures to respond to targets. Comissions: number of incorrect responses to non-targets. Mean Reaction Time: mean response speed of correct responses for the whole administration.
Baseline (T0; 1 week before intervention); postraining (T1; 1 week after intervention); follow-up (T2; 12 months after intervention finished)
Change from baseline cognitive flexibility at 8 weeks and at 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline (T0; 1 week before intervention); postraining (T1; 1 week after intervention); follow-up (T2; 12 months after intervention finished)
Children Color Trail Test - II. Total expended time.
Baseline (T0; 1 week before intervention); postraining (T1; 1 week after intervention); follow-up (T2; 12 months after intervention finished)
Change from baseline set-shifting at 8 weeks and at 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline (T0; 1 week before intervention); postraining (T1; 1 week after intervention); follow-up (T2; 12 months after intervention finished)
Shifting (Five Digits Test). Total expended time.
Baseline (T0; 1 week before intervention); postraining (T1; 1 week after intervention); follow-up (T2; 12 months after intervention finished)
Change from baseline attentional inhibition at 8 weeks and at 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline (T0; 1 week before intervention); postest (T1; 1 week after intervention); follow-up (T2; 12 months after intervention finished)
Choosing (Five Digits Test). Total expended time.
Baseline (T0; 1 week before intervention); postest (T1; 1 week after intervention); follow-up (T2; 12 months after intervention finished)
Change from baseline behavioral inhibition at 8 weeks and at 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline (T0; 1 week before intervention); postest (T1; 1 week after intervention); follow-up (T2; 12 months after intervention finished)
Go/No Go: it requires to perform an action given a letter stimuli ("p"- Go) and inhibit that action under a different set of stimuli ("r"- No-Go). After several trials the instructions are reversed ("r"-Go; "p"- No Go).
Baseline (T0; 1 week before intervention); postest (T1; 1 week after intervention); follow-up (T2; 12 months after intervention finished)
Change from baseline planning/reasoning at 8 weeks and at 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline (T0; 1 week before intervention); postraining (T1; 1 week after intervention); follow-up (T2; 12 months after intervention finished)
Tower of London consists of two boards with pegs and several beads with different colors. The examiner uses the beads and the boards to present the examinee with problem-solving tasks.
Baseline (T0; 1 week before intervention); postraining (T1; 1 week after intervention); follow-up (T2; 12 months after intervention finished)
Change from baseline neuroimaging (T1-weighted 3D sequence) at 8 weeks and at 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline (T0; 1 week before intervention); postraining (T1; 1 week after intervention); follow-up (T2; 12 months after intervention finished)
MPRAGE sequence: TR=2300 ms, TE=2.98 ms, TI 900 ms, 240 slices, FOV=256 mm; matrix size=256x256; 1 mm isotropic voxel
Baseline (T0; 1 week before intervention); postraining (T1; 1 week after intervention); follow-up (T2; 12 months after intervention finished)
Change from baseline neuroimaging (T2-weighted 3D sequence) at 8 weeks and at 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline (T0; 1 week before intervention); postraining (T1; 1 week after intervention); follow-up (T2; 12 months after intervention finished)
TR=3200 ms, TE=298 ms, 256 slices, FOV=224 mm; matrix size=256x256; 0.9 mm isotropic voxel
Baseline (T0; 1 week before intervention); postraining (T1; 1 week after intervention); follow-up (T2; 12 months after intervention finished)
Change from baseline neuroimaging (Diffusion Tensor Imaging sequence) at 8 weeks and at 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline (T0; 1 week before intervention); postraining (T1; 1 week after intervention); follow-up (T2; 12 months after intervention finished)
Singleshot diffusion weighted EPI sequence, two adquisitions AP and PA: b=1000mm2/s, 30 directions, TR=7700 ms, TE=89 ms, flip angle 90o, slice thickness=2 mm, 1.97 mm in-plane resolution
Baseline (T0; 1 week before intervention); postraining (T1; 1 week after intervention); follow-up (T2; 12 months after intervention finished)
Change from baseline neuroimaging (resting-state fMRI sequence) at 8 weeks and at 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline (T0; 1 week before intervention); postraining (T1; 1 week after intervention); follow-up (T2; 12 months after intervention finished)
gradient-echo echo-planar imaging-EPI sequence: 200 volumes of 40 axial slices, TR=2500ms; TE=28ms; matrix=80x80; field of view=24cm; slice thickness=3mm; 15% interslice gap; flip angle= 80o
Baseline (T0; 1 week before intervention); postraining (T1; 1 week after intervention); follow-up (T2; 12 months after intervention finished)
Change from baseline neuroimaging (clinical sequences) at 8 weeks and at 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline (T0; 1 week before intervention); postraining (T1; 1 week after intervention); follow-up (T2; 12 months after intervention finished)
clinical T2 (TR/TE=5150/99 ms; 512x307 matrix, flip angle 120o, slice thickness 5 mm with a 1.5-mm interslice gap) and FLAIR sequences (TR/TE=9040/85 ms; TI= 2500; 250X171 matrix, flip angle 150o, slice thickness 5 mm)
Baseline (T0; 1 week before intervention); postraining (T1; 1 week after intervention); follow-up (T2; 12 months after intervention finished)
Food-choices
Time Frame: Daily, over 6 weeks (training period)
Photographs of participants' meals (breakfast, lunch, dinner).
Daily, over 6 weeks (training period)
Change from baseline Body Mass Index (BMI) and waist circumference at 8 weeks and at 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline (T0; 1 week before intervention); postraining (T1; 1 week after intervention); follow-up (T2; 12 months after intervention finished)

Pediatric evaluation:

Height (m) and weight (kg) measures will be collected and combined to report BMI (kg/m^2).

Additionally, waist circumference (m) will be assessed.

Baseline (T0; 1 week before intervention); postraining (T1; 1 week after intervention); follow-up (T2; 12 months after intervention finished)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline self-report quality of life at 8 weeks and at 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline (T0; 1 week before intervention); postraining (T1; 1 week after intervention); follow-up (T2; 12 months after intervention finished)
Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (parents' version and children's version). 23 items. Each item is scored from 0 to 4 (0=never; 4=almost always), yielding a total between 0 and 92. Higher scores mean worse quality of life.
Baseline (T0; 1 week before intervention); postraining (T1; 1 week after intervention); follow-up (T2; 12 months after intervention finished)
Change from baseline social support and self-steem at 8 weeks and at 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline (T0; 1 week before intervention); postraining (T1; 1 week after intervention); follow-up (T2; 12 months after intervention finished)
The Self-Perception Profile for Children (SPPC). 70 items. Each item is scored from 0 to 4 (0=never; 4=almost always), yielding a total between 0 and 280. Higher scores mean better social support and self-steem.
Baseline (T0; 1 week before intervention); postraining (T1; 1 week after intervention); follow-up (T2; 12 months after intervention finished)
Change from baseline internalising and externalising problems at 8 weeks and at 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline (T0; 1 week before intervention); postraining (T1; 1 week after intervention); follow-up (T2; 12 months after intervention finished).
Child Behavior Checklist. 113 items. Each item is scored from 0 to 2 (0=not true; 2= true very often or quite often). Higher scores mean more psychological and behavioral problems.
Baseline (T0; 1 week before intervention); postraining (T1; 1 week after intervention); follow-up (T2; 12 months after intervention finished).
Change from baseline behavioral executive function at 8 weeks and at 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline (T0; 1 week before intervention); postraining (T1; 1 week after intervention); follow-up (T2; 12 months after intervention finished).
Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function - II (Parents' version and Schools' version). 63 items. Higher scores mean more executive problems.
Baseline (T0; 1 week before intervention); postraining (T1; 1 week after intervention); follow-up (T2; 12 months after intervention finished).
Activity and sleep patterns
Time Frame: Daily, during 6 weeks (the training period)
Fitbit tracker. Number of steps and number of sleep hours.
Daily, during 6 weeks (the training period)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Maria Angeles Jurado Luque, PhD, Institute of Neuroscience. Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, University of Barcelona

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 5, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 27, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

January 27, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 18, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 30, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

August 3, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 29, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 28, 2021

Last Verified

April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obesity

Clinical Trials on Executive function training

3
Subscribe