Effect of a Basic Skin Care Product on the Structural Strength of the Skin

February 18, 2025 updated by: Prof. Dr. Jan Kottner

An Exploratory Randomized Controlled Study to Evaluate the Effect of a Basic Skin Care Product on the Structural Strength of the Dermo-epidermal Junction

The main aim of this study is to investigate in a suction blister model, whether the use of a basic skin care formulation increases the mechanical integrity/adhesion of the dermo-epidermal junction.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The process of aging involves numerous structural and functional changes also affecting the skin. The skin fulfills a variety of protective and regulatory functions. Compared to other organs, the skin is constantly exposed to harmful environmental influences. Besides intrinsic factors these external factors may accelerate skin aging. Due to its ageing-related loss of functional capacity the skin becomes susceptible to develop adverse skin conditions and dermatological diseases (e.g. skin dryness, fungal infections). Especially old aged, care depended, and severely ill individuals are at high risk for developing severe skin injuries and wounds (e.g. decubitus, skin tears) with high social and economic impact. Empirical evidence indicates that the reduced adhesion of the dermal-epidermal junction is a major pathophysiological predictor for these types of injuries.

The suction blister model is an artificial and controlled technique for dermal-epidermal separation along the dermo-epidermal junction (DEJ). Empirical evidence suggests that the time of the dermal-epidermal separation (blistering time) is a measure of the dermo-epidermal adhesion. It has been proposed that the blistering time might be a clinically relevant parameter reflecting the mechanical integrity/stability of the dermo-epidermal junction.

Clinical practice guidelines recommend the use of topical skin care products to reduce the risk for pressure ulcer and skin tear development. However, the underlying working mechanisms of most basic skin care products are poorly understood. It is known that topically applied skin care products exhibit physical and chemical effects on and in the uppermost skin layers (e.g. the stratum corneum). Despite a few well known active ingredients (e.g. retinoids, vitamin C) exhibiting effects in the dermis, a particular skin protective effect of the vast majority of daily basic skin care applications on these deeper skin layers is unknown. The primary objective of this study is to test, whether the use of a basic skin care formulation increases the mechanical integrity/adhesion of the dermo-epidermal junction.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

17

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Berlin, Germany, 10117
        • Clinical Research Center for Hair and Skin Science, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Charite University Berlin

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years to 85 years (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy volunteers and/or with stable chronic condition (e.g. controlled hypertension)
  • Female,
  • 65 to 85 years,
  • Caucasian,
  • Phototype I to III according to the Fitzpatrick classification,
  • Body Mass Index between 20 and 28 kg/m2,
  • Non-smoker of at least one year,
  • Absence of skin diseases or scars in the skin area of interest,
  • Absence of tattoos in the skin area of interest,
  • Able to give written informed consent,
  • Willing and able to fulfill the study requirements

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known or suspected defect of healing,
  • Diabetes mellitus
  • Any acute or chronic pathology that may interfere with the trial conduct, from investigator point of view,
  • Acute or chronic wounds in the skin area of interest,
  • Any skin affection which may interfere with the trial assessment, like urticaria,, psoriasis or scar on investigational areas,
  • Medical history of skin cancer,
  • History or establishment of diabetes or pre-diabetes,
  • Any hyper-sensibility to one of the compounds of the investigational product,
  • Any regular treatment which may affect the blood coagulation and hemostasis (anticoagulant medications, NSAID, etc.) before the suction blister induction (Visit 3 and Visit 5), one NSAID to treat headache within four days is allowed
  • Any physical treatment (like laser or surgery) on the arms within the last 6 months,
  • Use of topical or systemic treatment on the investigational areas within the past 4 weeks (topical hyaluronan, anti-inflammatory drugs, corticoids, retinoids, vitamin C, etc.) that would interfere with assessment and/or investigational treatments,
  • Allergy to band-aid or to metals (such as nickel),
  • UV sessions or strong sun exposure of the arms during the study period,
  • Subject who cannot be contacted easily in case of necessity,
  • Current participation in any other clinical study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Treatment with petrolatum
In each healthy volunteer, one of the two forearms is randomly assigned to the intervention. This forearm is treated with petrolatum for 4 respectively 8 weeks.
Petrolatum is applied twice daily to the intervention arm.
No Intervention: Control
The control forearm will remain untreated throughout the study.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Blistering Time (Full Blister)
Time Frame: Day 28±2, Day 56±2
Duration from the start of suction pressure to the development of a full blister (measured in minutes)
Day 28±2, Day 56±2
Blistering Time (First Vesicles)
Time Frame: Day 28±2, Day 56±2
Duration from the start of suction pressure to the development of first macroscopically visible vesicles (measured in minutes)
Day 28±2, Day 56±2

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Epidermal Thickness
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 28±2, Day 56±2
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) will be used to quantitatively measure changes of the epidermal thickness on the volar forearm
Baseline, Day 28±2, Day 56±2
Epidermal Hydratation: Stratum Corneum Hydration
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 14±1, Day 28±2, Day 42±2, Day 56±2
Stratum corneum hydration (SCH) was measured with Corneometer® CM 825 (Courage & Khazaka electronic GmbH, Cologne, Germany) and expressed in arbitrary units (AU) (range 0-120 AU) on the volar forearm. Lower values represent reduced skin hydration in the upper skin layer.
Baseline, Day 14±1, Day 28±2, Day 42±2, Day 56±2
Epidermal Hydratation: Epidermal Moisture
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 14±1, Day 28±2, Day 42±2, Day 56±2
Epidermal Moisture (measurement depth 0,5mm) was measured using MoistureMeterEpiD (Delfin Technologies Ltd.). The values are expressed in percentage of local tissue water (0 to 100 %).
Baseline, Day 14±1, Day 28±2, Day 42±2, Day 56±2

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jan Kottner, Prof. Dr., Charite University, Berlin, Germany

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 31, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 11, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 1, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 6, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

August 10, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 18, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CRC-SP-A31

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy Skin

Clinical Trials on Treatment with petrolatum

Subscribe