Internal and Predictive Validity of Epworth Sleepiness Scale to Evaluate Vigilance of Patient Treated for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome. (SAHOS-TIME)

Internal and Predictive Validity of Epworth Sleepiness Scale to Evaluate Vigilance of Patient Treated for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome

Presently, there isn't any international recommendation to evaluate vigilance in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome. The French Society of Sleep Research and Medicine (SFRMS) recommend evaluating professional driver with a MWT but no recommendation exists for other patients. After a minimal treatment of 4 weeks, the physician has to evaluate the drowsiness risk of these patients using either an objective test like the MWT or a subjective one. In the university hospital Amiens-Picardie, since the 01/01/2015, every patient with an Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome diagnosed by a polysomnography or a ventilatory polygraphy had a MWT after 4 weeks of treatment. At each time of the evaluation, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, tiredness score of Pichot, and depressive score of Beck are performed.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

134

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Amiens, France
        • CHU Amiens

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 56 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

all patients more than 18 years treated by CPAP for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome diagnosed at the Sleep Medicine Unity of the Amiens Hospital having a MWT between the 01/01/15 and 31/12/16 were included. Patients were excluded if they had an Central Apnea Syndrome, Central Hypersomnia, no driving license or if they refused.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients treated by CPAP for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Central Apnea Syndrome
  • Central Hypersomnia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of the correlation between the MWT sleep latency scores and the results of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale after CPAP treatment
Time Frame: one day
Three levels of vigilance are defined by the MWT : more than 34 min is rated as good vigilance; ≥ 20 et < 34 min as intermediate vigilance; under 20 min as bad vigilance.
one day
Evaluation of the correlation between the MWT sleep latency scores and the results of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale after CPAP treatment
Time Frame: one day
Two levels of vigilance are defined by the ESS score: score ≥11: bad vigilance, <11: good vigilance
one day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 25, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 8, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

October 8, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 16, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 13, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

August 14, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 16, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 15, 2020

Last Verified

July 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe