- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03653078
Root Proximity During Mini-Screw Insertion Using a Digital Three-Dimensional Printed Guide
August 28, 2018 updated by: Hadir Aboshady, Cairo University
Evaluation of Root Proximity During Mini-Screw Insertion Using a Digital Three-Dimensional Printed Guide Versus Conventional Free Hand Placement Technique in Adult Orthodontic Patients A Split Mouth Randomized Clinical Trial
Although mini screw insertion is considered as a simple and non-invasive technique, it's a critical procedure which requires precision and accuracy.
The placement of mini-screw poses a challenge to the orthodontist, particularly if the space available for mini-screws is limited.4
The proximity to the vital structures surrounding the proposed mini-screw position necessitates the precise knowledge of the anatomy of the insertion area.5
The incidence of mini-screw to tooth contact in the placement of inter-radicular region was 27%.6
Although failure of mini screw is considered a multi-factorial concern, many studies reported the proximity of a mini-screw to tooth structures is a major risk factor for failure, especially in the inter-radicular inserted mini-screws.
guided insertion was believed to give more favorable results.
Above all, the recent technology of the scanning and three-dimensional printing could pave the way to construct a simple accurate guide.
Additionally all previous studies assessed the insertion accuracy using CBCT post-operatively, that can't be applied on human subjects for ethical reasons.
Thus a non-invasive method for assessment of mini-screw insertion should be implemented.
Study Overview
Status
Unknown
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
PICOs P: Adult orthodontic patients need mini screws in maxillary arch bilaterally for anchorage I: Three dimensional printed digital guide for mini screw insertion C: Conventional free hand insertion technique
- O: Primary outcome: Root proximity
Secondary outcomes:
- Patient discomfort during insertion 17
- Insertion accuracy
- Angular deviation
- Linear deviation
- Failure 18 S: Split Mouth Randomized clinical Trial
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Anticipated)
30
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
14 years to 45 years (Child, Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Orthodontic patients with Angle's Class I bimaxillary protrusion • Patients having average mandibular plane angle
Exclusion Criteria:
Mixed dentition patients
- Smoker patients
- Patients with Increased lower facial height
- Patients with missing posterior teeth
- Bleeding disorders or anticoagulant therapy
- Patients with cleft lip & palate
- Patients with facial asymmetry
- Patients with transverse maxillary deficiency
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Three dimensional printed digital guide
one mini-screw will be inserted in the buccal interradicular space between upper second premolar and first molar using Three dimensional printed digital guide, which is a device deisgned and printed through CAD/CAM technology, it's a printed plate fit on the teeth and buccal mucosa with a channel for mini- screw insertion, mini-screw will be inserted through the plate's channel
|
A CAD/CAM printed plate with a channel for mini-screw insertion
Other Names:
|
|
No Intervention: Conventional free hand insertion
one mini-screw will be inserted in the buccal interradicular space between upper second premolar and first molar using conventional free hand insertion of mini-screw, which is a technique using the guiding anatomy for mini-screw insertion using the driver and the operator's skill.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Root proximity
Time Frame: immediately after mini-screw insertion (T0)
|
Distance between inserted mini screw and the adjacent roots in microns
|
immediately after mini-screw insertion (T0)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient discomfort:
Time Frame: immediately after mini-screw insertion (T0)
|
Likert scale, it is scale divided into five points to measure the degree of patient discomfort maximum value(5) strongly discomfort, discomfort, neutral, little discomfort, and minimum value (0)no discomfort
|
immediately after mini-screw insertion (T0)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Bae MJ, Kim JY, Park JT, Cha JY, Kim HJ, Yu HS, Hwang CJ. Accuracy of miniscrew surgical guides assessed from cone-beam computed tomography and digital models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Jun;143(6):893-901. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.02.018.
- Suzuki EY, Suzuki B. Accuracy of miniscrew implant placement with a 3-dimensional surgical guide. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Jun;66(6):1245-52. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2007.08.047.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
November 15, 2018
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
December 15, 2019
Study Completion (Anticipated)
January 15, 2020
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
August 28, 2018
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 28, 2018
First Posted (Actual)
August 31, 2018
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
August 31, 2018
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 28, 2018
Last Verified
August 1, 2018
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- CEBD-CU-2018-08-27
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
UNDECIDED
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.