- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03691545
Making Healthy Choices: Does Having an Online Health Coach Help?
March 6, 2020 updated by: Jennifer Brunet, University of Ottawa
Helping Rural-living Young Adult Cancer Survivors Make Healthy Lifestyle Choices: Does Having a Telehealth Personal Health Coach Help?
Participating in regular physical activity and consuming a diet high in fruits and vegetables can aid in the management of various acute and chronic side effects of cancer treatment; however, few rural-dwelling young adult cancer survivors are active enough and consume enough fruits and vegetables to accrue benefits.
Telehealth interventions show promise for helping these young adults increase their motivation to participate in these behaviours by addressing barriers associated with accessing face-to-face behaviour counselling services (e.g., time commitment, travel distance).
Yet, few researchers have examined the feasibility and acceptability of a telehealth intervention that provides motivational support grounded in self-determination theory for these health behaviours in rural-dwelling young adult cancer survivors.
Based on previous research, the researchers reasoned that rural-dwelling young adult cancer survivors' physical activity and fruit and vegetable consumption would be more likely to increase if they participated in a telehealth intervention therefore, the researchers aim to test the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of the intervention.
The researchers also aim to assess if changes in perceived basic psychological need satisfaction, behaviour regulation, and perceived autonomy support are associated with changes in physical activity and fruit and vegetable consumption.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
7
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Ontario
-
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1N6N5
- University of Ottawa
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
20 years to 39 years (Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Are between the ages of 20-39 years
- Live in a rural area (i.e., areas with <35,000 inhabitants)
- Have completed primary treatment for non-metastatic cancer
- Are not currently meeting the American Cancer Society guidelines for physical activity and fruit and vegetable consumption
- Have access to the Internet and to audio-visual devices
- Are willing to provide informed consent to participate in this study and willing to follow study protocol
- Able to read and understand English
- Are ambulatory
Exclusion Criteria:
- Have a serious condition that precludes safe participation in physical activity
- Have symptomatic heart or vascular diseases (angina, peripheral vascular disease, congestive heart failure)
- Have severe hypertension
- Have had a recent stroke
- Have a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
- Have severe insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus
- Have renal disease
- Have liver disease
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Intervention Group
(1) 12 weekly interactive sessions with a health coach to help them set goals and make changes toward becoming physically active and consuming the recommended number of fruits and vegetables.
|
This arm will receive personalized health coaching (behaviour change counseling)
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Physical activity behaviour: International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form (IPAQ-S; Booth, 2000).
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 12)
|
Change in self-reported physical activity (over the past 7 days) from baseline to post-intervention, with higher scores representing a better outcome.
|
Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 12)
|
Fruit and vegetable intake behaviour: Behavioural Risk Factor Surveillance System Fruit and Vegetable section (BRFSS-FV; Trowbridge, Wong, Byers, & Serdula, 1990)
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 12)
|
Change in self-reported fruit and vegetable intake (over the past 7 days) from baseline to post-intervention, with higher scores representing a better outcome.
|
Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 12)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Basic psychological needs satisfaction for physical activity: Psychological Need Satisfaction in Exercise Scale (PNSE; Wilson, Rogers, Rodgers, & Wild, 2006)
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 12)
|
Change in basic psychological need satisfaction for physical activity from baseline to post-intervention, using a 1 (false) to 6 (true) scale with higher scores representing a better outcome.
|
Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 12)
|
Basic psychological need satisfaction for fruit and vegetable consumption: Psychological Need Satisfaction questionnaire (PNS; Deci, Ryan, Gagne, Leone, Usunov, & Kornazheva, 2001)
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 12)
|
Change in basic psychological need satisfaction for fruit and vegetable consumption from baseline to post-intervention, using a 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree) scale with higher scores representing a better outcome.
|
Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 12)
|
Motivational regulations for physical activity: Exercise Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire (TSRQ-E; Williams, Deci, & Ryan, 1998)
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 12)
|
Change in motivational regulations for physical activity from baseline to post-intervention, using a 1 (not at all true) to 7 (very true) scale with higher scores representing a better outcome.
|
Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 12)
|
Motivational regulations for fruit and vegetable consumption: Dietary Self-Regulation questionnaire (DSR; Williams, Deci, & Ryan, 1998)
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 12)
|
Change in motivational regulations for fruit and vegetable consumption from baseline to post-intervention, using a 1 (not at all true) to 7 (very true) scale with higher scores representing a better outcome.
|
Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 12)
|
Perceived autonomy support: Health Care Climate Questionnaire (HCCQ; Williams, Grow, Freedman, Ryan, & Deci, 1996)
Time Frame: Post-intervention (week 12)
|
Level of perceived autonomy support for health behaviours post-intervention, using a 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree) scale with higher scores representing a better outcome.
|
Post-intervention (week 12)
|
Recruitment rates
Time Frame: Duration of recruitment and intervention phase (12 weeks)
|
The number of eligible participants who enrol in the study out of the number assessed for eligibility
|
Duration of recruitment and intervention phase (12 weeks)
|
Retention rates for intervention
Time Frame: Duration of recruitment and intervention phase (12 weeks)
|
The number of participants completing the 12-week intervention.
|
Duration of recruitment and intervention phase (12 weeks)
|
Adherence rates for intervention
Time Frame: Duration of recruitment and intervention phase (12 weeks)
|
The number of eligible participants completing ≥ 70% of the intervention sessions (i.e., 8/12)
|
Duration of recruitment and intervention phase (12 weeks)
|
Acceptability of intervention: Semi-structured interviews
Time Frame: Post-intervention (12 weeks)
|
Participants will be asked what they liked, disliked, and experienced during the intervention
|
Post-intervention (12 weeks)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Williams GC, Grow VM, Freedman ZR, Ryan RM, Deci EL. Motivational predictors of weight loss and weight-loss maintenance. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 Jan;70(1):115-26. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.70.1.115.
- Booth M. Assessment of physical activity: an international perspective. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2000 Jun;71(2 Suppl):S114-20. No abstract available.
- Deci, E. L., Ryan, R.M., Gagne, M., Leone, D.R., Usunov, J., & Kornazheva, B.P. (2001). Need satisfaction, motivation, and well-being in the work organizations of a former eastern bloc country: A cross-sectional study of self-determination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27(8), 930-942.
- Trowbridge FL, Wong FL, Byers TE, Serdula MK. Methodological issues in nutrition surveillance: the CDC experience. J Nutr. 1990 Nov;120 Suppl 11:1512-8. doi: 10.1093/jn/120.suppl_11.1512.
- Williams, G. C., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1998). Building health-care partnerships by supporting autonomy: Promoting maintained behavior change and positive health outcomes. In A. L. Suchman, P. Hinton-Walker, & R. Botelho (Ed.), Partnerships in healthcare: Transforming relational process (pp. 67-87). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
- Wilson, P. M., Rogers, W. T., Rodgers, W. M., & Wild, T. C. (2006). Psychological need satisfaction in exercise scale. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 28, 231-251.
- Price J, Brunet J. Feasibility and acceptability of a telehealth behavior change intervention for promoting physical activity and fruit and vegetable consumption among rural-living young adult cancer survivors. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2021;39(6):715-733. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2021.1896616. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
October 1, 2018
Primary Completion (Actual)
September 30, 2019
Study Completion (Actual)
September 30, 2019
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
September 27, 2018
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 28, 2018
First Posted (Actual)
October 1, 2018
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
March 9, 2020
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 6, 2020
Last Verified
March 1, 2020
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- H08-18-882
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Physical Activity
-
Istinye UniversityCompletedPhysical Activity | Youth | Physical Activity Barriers | Physical Activity FacilitatorsTurkey
-
Istanbul Kültür UniversityWithdrawnPhysical Activity Level | Physical Activity Awareness
-
Georgetown UniversityUniversity of PennsylvaniaCompletedPhysical Activity | Motor ActivityUnited States
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisTerminatedPhysical Activity | Physical DisabilityFrance
-
University of Colorado, DenverCompletedPhysical Activity | Physical ImpairmentUnited States
-
PXL University CollegeHasselt UniversityNot yet recruitingPhysical Activity - Digital Phenotyping - Activity Tracking
-
University of ExtremaduraThe Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and UniversitiesRecruitingPhysical Activity | Cognition | Physical Fitness | AdolescentsSpain
-
AdventHealth Translational Research InstituteWake Forest UniversityRecruiting
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesMayo Clinic; National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases... and other collaboratorsRecruitingPhysical ActivityUnited States
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesMayo Clinic; National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases... and other collaboratorsRecruiting
Clinical Trials on interactive sessions
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesCompletedHematopoietic Cell TransplantUnited States
-
Toros UniversityNot yet recruiting13-18 Year | Diagnosed at Least 6 Months Ago | HbA1C> 7.5 | Being Able to Read and Write
-
University GhentResearch Foundation FlandersCompletedFather-Child RelationsBelgium
-
Brain & Body Health FoundationUnknownTraumatic Brain Injury | Concussion | Mild Cognitive DisorderUnited States
-
KU LeuvenVLIR-UOS; Kyambogo University; Our Lady of Africa Mbuya Catholic ParishCompleted
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamCompletedChronic Low Back PainUnited States
-
Mashhad University of Medical SciencesTerminatedInteractive CD-based Education
-
University College, LondonUniversity of California, Santa Cruz; Anna Freud National Centre for Children... and other collaboratorsUnknown
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisVille Evrard HospitalRecruitingAutism Spectrum DisordersFrance