Chronic Low Back Pain Graded - Exposure Psychoeducation Intervention (VRGE)

October 30, 2019 updated by: Zina Trost, University of Alabama at Birmingham
This study will examine the effectiveness of one of two psychoeducation treatments on chronic low back pain.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study will examine the effectiveness of one of two psychoeducation treatments on chronic low back pain. Participants will be randomized to one of these two treatments.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35294
        • University of Alabama at Birmingham

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • report having low back pain for more than three months and at least half the days in the past 6 months
  • be 18-65 years of age,
  • have scores higher than 37 on the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia,

Exclusion Criteria:

  • medical conditions other than back pain that significantly impair movement (e.g., arthritis)
  • confirmed/suspected pregnancy
  • pending litigation related to an episode of low back pain
  • significant impairment in vision

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Interactive Psycho-education
Interactive psycho-education using interactive dashboard.
Individuals will receive interactive psychoeducation in the lab over the course of a week period. Each session will take approximately 30 minutes.
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Psycho-education
Non-interactive psycho-education not using interactive dashboard.
Individuals will receive non-interactive psychoeducation over the course of a week period. Each session will take approximately 30 minutes.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Intensity as assessed by Numeric Rating Scale
Time Frame: Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)

The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) measures pain intensity measured via 0-10 numeric rating scale.

0 = No Pain - 10 = Worst Possible Pain Range of scores: 0-10

Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)
Present Pain Intensity
Time Frame: Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)
Present Pain Intensity (PPI) assesses present pain intensity on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 5 (excruciating)
Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)
Present Pain Rating
Time Frame: Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)

Pain Rating Index (PRI) is assessed by 15 questions assessing pain in the sensory and affective dimensions.

Items rate from 0 (none) to 3 (severe) on degree to which the words apply to pain.

Score Range: 0-45

Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)
Pain Chronicity assessed by the Graded Chronic Pain Scale
Time Frame: Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)

Pain Chronicity is assessed by the Graded Chronic Pain Scale (GCPS). The GCPS is 7 questions with 3 sub-scales (Characteristic pain intensity, disability score, and disability points).

Scoring:

Characteristic Pain Intensity: is a 0 to 100 score derived from Questions 1 through 3: Mean (Pain Right Now, Worst Pain, Average Pain) X 10.

Disability Score: is 0 to 100 score derived from Questions 4 through 6: Mean (Daily Activities, Social Activities, Work Activities) X 10 Disability Points: Add the indicated points for Disability Days (Question 7) and for Disability Score (0-6).

Items rate from 0 to 10 with 0 referencing no pain/interference/change and 10 referencing pain as bad as could be/unable to carry out any activities/extreme change.

Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)
Daily Pain Monitoring: 10 point scale
Time Frame: Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)

Daily pain monitoring defined as daily pain intensity and daily pain interference monitoring is two questions asked daily on a 10 point scale assessing daily pain and how much pain had interfered with day to day activities.

Pain: Over the past 24 hours, how would you rate your back pain on average? (0=No Pain; 10=Worst Imaginable Pain)

Interference: Over the past 24 hours, how much did pain interfere with your day-to-day activities? (0=No Interference; 10 = A great deal of interference)"

Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Treatment Evaluation as assessed by the Modified Treatment Evaluation Inventory
Time Frame: Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)

Patient treatment evaluation is assessed by Treatment Evaluation Inventory. This is a 9 item scale with a 5-point Likert responses for each question. The items are scored by summing all items.

Range of scores: 9-45. A higher score indicates greater acceptance of treatment.

Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)
Back Disability as assessed by the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)

The Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) assesses disability due to low back pain.

The RMDQ is a 24 item survey with yes/no response options. Score 0 -24 with ower scores indicate more impairment.

Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)
Depressive symptoms as assessed by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale
Time Frame: Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)

The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) is a 20 item survey tool. The items are a 4 pt Likert response items.

Scores range from 0-60 with higher scores indicate greater levels of depressive symptoms.

Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)
Pain Catastrophizing as assessed by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale
Time Frame: Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)

The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) is a 13 item survey assessing catastrophizing in context to pain. There are 13 items with 5-pt Likert responses.

There are several subscales. Scoring Procedure: The PCS total score is computed by summing responses to all 13 items (0-52).

Subscales:

Rumination: Sum of items 8, 9, 10, 11 (0-16). Magnification: Sum of items 6, 7, 13 (0-12). Helplessness: Sum of items 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 12 (0-24).

Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)
Pain-related fear of movement as assessed by the Tampa Scale Kinesiophobia
Time Frame: Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)

The Tampa Scale Kinesiophobia (TSK) is a 17 item assessment of fear of movement. This uses a 5-pt Likert scale from 1 = Strongly Disagree to 4 = Strongly Agree.

Scoring Procedure: Sum items Range: 17-68 Subscale Harm/Somatic Items: 3, 5, 6, 9, 11, 15 Subscale Avoidance Items: 1, 2, 7, 10, 13, 14, 17

Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)
Mood and Affect as assessed by the Positive and Negative Affect Scale
Time Frame: Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)

The Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS) measures mood of participants. This is a 20 item survey with 5 pt Likert response indicating to what degree the participant feels those emotions. There is a positive and negative subscale.

Higher positive affect score indicates greater positive emotions; higher negative affect score indicates greater negative emotions.

Range of Scores: 0-40

Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)
Immersive Tendencies
Time Frame: Baseline only

Immersive Tendencies are assessed by the Immersive Tendencies Questionnaire (ITQ). This is an 18-item survey. Item responses use a 7 point Likert scale. Subscales include: focus, involvement, emotions, and play. Each subscale is scored by summing items. A total score is scored by summing all items.

Range of total score: 18-126 Focus range of scores: 5-35 Involvement range of scores: 5-35 Emotions range of scores: 4-28 Play range of scores: 3-21 Higher scores indicate higher immersive tendencies overall and in each sub-scale.

Baseline only
Absorption Tendencies
Time Frame: Baseline Only

Tellegen Absorption Scale is a 34-item multi-dimensional measure that assesses imaginative involvement and the tendency to become mentally absorbed in everyday activities. Item responses are on a 5-point Likert scale. Items are summed to score.

Range of scores: 0-136. Higher scores indicate greater levels of absorption.

Baseline Only
Video Game History
Time Frame: Baseline Only
History of playing video games.
Baseline Only
Patient Treatment Evaluation as assessed by Semi-structured Qualitative interviewing
Time Frame: Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)
Patient treatment evaluation is assessed by semi-structured interviewing. Qualitative feedback from participant experience will be assessed by thematic analyses.
Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)
Daily intervention feedback questions
Time Frame: Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)

The daily intervention feedback questions are 7 items that assess the individuals feelings and experiences during that daily intervention session.

0-10 Likert scale

Each item is it's own scale.

Higher scores indicate more enjoyment/usefulness/demand/awareness/concern/mood.

Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)
Patient Treatment Evaluation as assessed by the Usefulness, Satisfaction, and Ease of Use Questionnaire
Time Frame: Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)

The Usefulness, Satisfaction, and Ease of Use Questionnaire (USE, Lund, 2001) measures the subjective usability of a product or service. It is a 30-item survey that examines four dimensions of usability: usefulness, ease of use, ease of learning, and satisfaction. This metric can be applied to various scenarios of usability assessment because it is non-proprietary and technology-agnostic. is a 30 item survey.

Each item is presented on a 7-point Likert scale from strongly disagree = 1 to strongly agree. = 7

Each subscale is calculated by averaging all items in subscale. Usefulness: items 1-8 Ease of use: items 9-19 Ease of Learning: items 20-23 Satisfaction: items 24-30

Range of scores for each subscale: 1-7 Scoring Interpretation: Higher score indicates greater usefulness, satisfaction, and ease of use.

Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)
Patient Treatment Evaluation as assessed by the Patient Global Impression of Change Scale
Time Frame: Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)

Patient treatment evaluation is assessed by the Patient Global Impression of Change. This is a one item 7 point Likert item assessing improvement of the participants overall status.

Item responses:

1 = very much improved, 2 = much improved, 3 = minimally improved, 4 = no change, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = much worse, and 7 = very much worse

Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)
Video Game Preferences as assessed by the BrainHex
Time Frame: Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)
Video game preferences will be assessed by the BrainHex. The BrainHex provides a tool for designing gameplay and understanding motivations for play.
Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

May 1, 2019

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 5, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 8, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

April 9, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

October 31, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 30, 2019

Last Verified

October 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 300002878

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Low Back Pain

Clinical Trials on Interactive - Psychoeducation

3
Subscribe