- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03909048
Chronic Low Back Pain Graded - Exposure Psychoeducation Intervention (VRGE)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Alabama
-
Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35294
- University of Alabama at Birmingham
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- report having low back pain for more than three months and at least half the days in the past 6 months
- be 18-65 years of age,
- have scores higher than 37 on the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia,
Exclusion Criteria:
- medical conditions other than back pain that significantly impair movement (e.g., arthritis)
- confirmed/suspected pregnancy
- pending litigation related to an episode of low back pain
- significant impairment in vision
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: DOUBLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
EXPERIMENTAL: Interactive Psycho-education
Interactive psycho-education using interactive dashboard.
|
Individuals will receive interactive psychoeducation in the lab over the course of a week period.
Each session will take approximately 30 minutes.
|
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Psycho-education
Non-interactive psycho-education not using interactive dashboard.
|
Individuals will receive non-interactive psychoeducation over the course of a week period.
Each session will take approximately 30 minutes.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Pain Intensity as assessed by Numeric Rating Scale
Time Frame: Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)
|
The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) measures pain intensity measured via 0-10 numeric rating scale. 0 = No Pain - 10 = Worst Possible Pain Range of scores: 0-10 |
Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)
|
Present Pain Intensity
Time Frame: Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)
|
Present Pain Intensity (PPI) assesses present pain intensity on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 5 (excruciating)
|
Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)
|
Present Pain Rating
Time Frame: Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)
|
Pain Rating Index (PRI) is assessed by 15 questions assessing pain in the sensory and affective dimensions. Items rate from 0 (none) to 3 (severe) on degree to which the words apply to pain. Score Range: 0-45 |
Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)
|
Pain Chronicity assessed by the Graded Chronic Pain Scale
Time Frame: Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)
|
Pain Chronicity is assessed by the Graded Chronic Pain Scale (GCPS). The GCPS is 7 questions with 3 sub-scales (Characteristic pain intensity, disability score, and disability points). Scoring: Characteristic Pain Intensity: is a 0 to 100 score derived from Questions 1 through 3: Mean (Pain Right Now, Worst Pain, Average Pain) X 10. Disability Score: is 0 to 100 score derived from Questions 4 through 6: Mean (Daily Activities, Social Activities, Work Activities) X 10 Disability Points: Add the indicated points for Disability Days (Question 7) and for Disability Score (0-6). Items rate from 0 to 10 with 0 referencing no pain/interference/change and 10 referencing pain as bad as could be/unable to carry out any activities/extreme change. |
Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)
|
Daily Pain Monitoring: 10 point scale
Time Frame: Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)
|
Daily pain monitoring defined as daily pain intensity and daily pain interference monitoring is two questions asked daily on a 10 point scale assessing daily pain and how much pain had interfered with day to day activities. Pain: Over the past 24 hours, how would you rate your back pain on average? (0=No Pain; 10=Worst Imaginable Pain) Interference: Over the past 24 hours, how much did pain interfere with your day-to-day activities? (0=No Interference; 10 = A great deal of interference)" |
Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Patient Treatment Evaluation as assessed by the Modified Treatment Evaluation Inventory
Time Frame: Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)
|
Patient treatment evaluation is assessed by Treatment Evaluation Inventory. This is a 9 item scale with a 5-point Likert responses for each question. The items are scored by summing all items. Range of scores: 9-45. A higher score indicates greater acceptance of treatment. |
Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)
|
Back Disability as assessed by the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)
|
The Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) assesses disability due to low back pain. The RMDQ is a 24 item survey with yes/no response options. Score 0 -24 with ower scores indicate more impairment. |
Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)
|
Depressive symptoms as assessed by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale
Time Frame: Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)
|
The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) is a 20 item survey tool. The items are a 4 pt Likert response items. Scores range from 0-60 with higher scores indicate greater levels of depressive symptoms. |
Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)
|
Pain Catastrophizing as assessed by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale
Time Frame: Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)
|
The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) is a 13 item survey assessing catastrophizing in context to pain. There are 13 items with 5-pt Likert responses. There are several subscales. Scoring Procedure: The PCS total score is computed by summing responses to all 13 items (0-52). Subscales: Rumination: Sum of items 8, 9, 10, 11 (0-16). Magnification: Sum of items 6, 7, 13 (0-12). Helplessness: Sum of items 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 12 (0-24). |
Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)
|
Pain-related fear of movement as assessed by the Tampa Scale Kinesiophobia
Time Frame: Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)
|
The Tampa Scale Kinesiophobia (TSK) is a 17 item assessment of fear of movement. This uses a 5-pt Likert scale from 1 = Strongly Disagree to 4 = Strongly Agree. Scoring Procedure: Sum items Range: 17-68 Subscale Harm/Somatic Items: 3, 5, 6, 9, 11, 15 Subscale Avoidance Items: 1, 2, 7, 10, 13, 14, 17 |
Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)
|
Mood and Affect as assessed by the Positive and Negative Affect Scale
Time Frame: Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)
|
The Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS) measures mood of participants. This is a 20 item survey with 5 pt Likert response indicating to what degree the participant feels those emotions. There is a positive and negative subscale. Higher positive affect score indicates greater positive emotions; higher negative affect score indicates greater negative emotions. Range of Scores: 0-40 |
Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)
|
Immersive Tendencies
Time Frame: Baseline only
|
Immersive Tendencies are assessed by the Immersive Tendencies Questionnaire (ITQ). This is an 18-item survey. Item responses use a 7 point Likert scale. Subscales include: focus, involvement, emotions, and play. Each subscale is scored by summing items. A total score is scored by summing all items. Range of total score: 18-126 Focus range of scores: 5-35 Involvement range of scores: 5-35 Emotions range of scores: 4-28 Play range of scores: 3-21 Higher scores indicate higher immersive tendencies overall and in each sub-scale. |
Baseline only
|
Absorption Tendencies
Time Frame: Baseline Only
|
Tellegen Absorption Scale is a 34-item multi-dimensional measure that assesses imaginative involvement and the tendency to become mentally absorbed in everyday activities. Item responses are on a 5-point Likert scale. Items are summed to score. Range of scores: 0-136. Higher scores indicate greater levels of absorption. |
Baseline Only
|
Video Game History
Time Frame: Baseline Only
|
History of playing video games.
|
Baseline Only
|
Patient Treatment Evaluation as assessed by Semi-structured Qualitative interviewing
Time Frame: Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)
|
Patient treatment evaluation is assessed by semi-structured interviewing.
Qualitative feedback from participant experience will be assessed by thematic analyses.
|
Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)
|
Daily intervention feedback questions
Time Frame: Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)
|
The daily intervention feedback questions are 7 items that assess the individuals feelings and experiences during that daily intervention session. 0-10 Likert scale Each item is it's own scale. Higher scores indicate more enjoyment/usefulness/demand/awareness/concern/mood. |
Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)
|
Patient Treatment Evaluation as assessed by the Usefulness, Satisfaction, and Ease of Use Questionnaire
Time Frame: Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)
|
The Usefulness, Satisfaction, and Ease of Use Questionnaire (USE, Lund, 2001) measures the subjective usability of a product or service. It is a 30-item survey that examines four dimensions of usability: usefulness, ease of use, ease of learning, and satisfaction. This metric can be applied to various scenarios of usability assessment because it is non-proprietary and technology-agnostic. is a 30 item survey. Each item is presented on a 7-point Likert scale from strongly disagree = 1 to strongly agree. = 7 Each subscale is calculated by averaging all items in subscale. Usefulness: items 1-8 Ease of use: items 9-19 Ease of Learning: items 20-23 Satisfaction: items 24-30 Range of scores for each subscale: 1-7 Scoring Interpretation: Higher score indicates greater usefulness, satisfaction, and ease of use. |
Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)
|
Patient Treatment Evaluation as assessed by the Patient Global Impression of Change Scale
Time Frame: Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)
|
Patient treatment evaluation is assessed by the Patient Global Impression of Change. This is a one item 7 point Likert item assessing improvement of the participants overall status. Item responses: 1 = very much improved, 2 = much improved, 3 = minimally improved, 4 = no change, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = much worse, and 7 = very much worse |
Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)
|
Video Game Preferences as assessed by the BrainHex
Time Frame: Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)
|
Video game preferences will be assessed by the BrainHex.
The BrainHex provides a tool for designing gameplay and understanding motivations for play.
|
Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 300002878
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Chronic Low Back Pain
-
Dow University of Health SciencesRecruitingLow Back Pain | Chronic Low-back Pain | Low Back Pain, Mechanical | Mechanical Low Back Pain | Pain, Chronic | Pain, Back | Lower Back Pain Chronic | CLBP - Chronic Low Back PainPakistan
-
Iran University of Medical SciencesNot yet recruitingLow Back Pain | Chronic Low-back Pain | Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain | Cupping Therapy
-
Federal University of Minas GeraisRecruitingBack Pain | Low Back Pain | Chronic Low-back Pain | Back Pain Lower Back ChronicBrazil
-
Federal University of ParaíbaCompletedChronic Low Back Pain | Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain
-
Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de...CompletedLow Back Pain, Mechanical | Low Back Pain, Postural | Lower Back Pain Chronic | Low Back Pain, Posterior CompartmentBrazil
-
University of Colorado, BoulderNational Institutes of Health (NIH); Radiological Society of North America; Psychophysiologic... and other collaboratorsCompletedChronic Pain | Back Pain Lower Back Chronic | Back Pain, LowUnited States
-
Presidio Medical, IncRecruitingChronic Pain | Chronic Low-back PainAustralia
-
Spaulding Rehabilitation HospitalHighland Instruments, Inc.Active, not recruitingChronic Pain | Chronic Low Back PainUnited States
-
University of WashingtonNational Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)Active, not recruiting
-
Dan RhonNational Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH); 59th Medical... and other collaboratorsRecruitingLow Back Pain | Chronic Pain | Surgery | Back Pain Lower Back Chronic | Back Pain, LowUnited States
Clinical Trials on Interactive - Psychoeducation
-
University of MelbourneVA Palo Alto Health Care SystemCompleted
-
VA Palo Alto Health Care SystemUniversity of MelbourneUnknown
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...TerminatedBipolar Disorder Family MembersUnited States
-
IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio FatebenefratelliAlzheimer's Association; University of BergamoRecruiting
-
The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityHealth and Medical Research FundNot yet recruitingCaregiving Stress
-
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityUniversity of Virginia; Autism Speaks; National Center for Advancing Translational...CompletedAutism Spectrum DisorderUnited States
-
ŞİRİN HARKİNEnrolling by invitationSchizophrenia | Well-being | Caregiver | Psychoeducation | Communication SkillsTurkey
-
University of Missouri, Kansas CityUniversity of KansasCompletedMultiple SclerosisUnited States
-
Uppsala UniversityCompleted
-
Istanbul Medeniyet UniversityCompletedElderly People | Depressive Symptoms | DespondencyTurkey