NYCKidSeq: Incorporating Genomics Into Clinical Care of Diverse NYC Children

December 6, 2023 updated by: Eimear Kenny, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
The NYCKidSeq program will significantly advance the implementation of genomic medicine, particularly for children, young adults and their families in Harlem and the Bronx. The study will assess the clinical utility of genomic medicine in three broad areas of pediatric disorders, while engaging a range of providers and community advisors to overcome the well-documented barriers to inclusion of underserved and underrepresented populations in genomic research. The study will also include testing, analyzing, and implementing a novel communication tool, Genomic Understanding, Information and Awareness (GUÍA), to facilitate the return of genomic test results. The use of GUÍA will enhance the understanding of these genomic testing results by families, patients, and care providers at all levels of expertise, in two health systems. Healthcare system leadership will be engaged to provide insights into their readiness for genomic implementation. Overall, the NYCKidSeq program will inform the genomics and clinical communities about how to implement genomic medicine in a diverse population in a clinically useful, technologically savvy, culturally sensitive, and ethically sound manner.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

NYCKidSeq is a research study using a randomized controlled trial (RCT) design to compare the use of GUÍA in a traditional genetic counseling return of results session to facilitate the return of genomic results compared to a traditional return of results counseling session. GUÍA will be an enhanced, personalized electronic version focused on helping patients understand their own genomic results. The researchers will also evaluate the clinical utility of whole genome sequencing (WGS) compared to targeted gene panels (TGP) in children with suspected genetic etiology of their neurologic disorders, primary immunodeficiencies, and cardiovascular disorders with the goal of detecting the mutated gene(s) responsible for their disorder.

1100 referred children Mount Sinai and Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Hospital (Einstein/Montefiore) will be enrolled and randomized to either traditional genetic counseling (standard of care) or traditional genetic counseling plus GUÍA. The researchers will assess parents' perceived and subjective understanding of results as well as their adherence to follow-up recommendation (primary and secondary outcomes) through the use of parental surveys at three time points. The RCT will occur in the context of performing WGS and TGP for diagnostic purposes in 1,130 children.

Participants will have three study visits (Baseline, ROR1, and ROR2) over a nine-month period. At the baseline visit, families will receive pre-test counseling and will complete a survey. Blood will be collected from all study participants and from each biological parent (if available) to assist with interpretation of genomic results. Samples will undergo WGS and TGP. Approximately three months later, results will be returned and explained via one of the two study arms - traditional genetic counseling versus genetic counseling with GUÍA, and parents will be asked to complete the ROR1 survey. Six months later, they will be asked to complete the ROR2 survey. The length of a subject's participation will be a minimum of nine months to a maximum of 27 months, depending on the time of study entry; participation after the initial nine months will consist solely of chart and data review. Over the initial 9-month period the investigators are studying the experiences and understanding of parents of children who receive sequencing to help understand how best to implement genomic medicine in a diverse population.

GUÍA will be an enhanced, personalized electronic version of a flip chart, which is the type of tool most commonly used in routine genetic counseling. In the third year of the study, the study team anticipates to have the tool integrated into EPIC. There are no tools yet focused on this complex information, specifically on helping patients understand their own genomic results.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

650

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • Bronx, New York, United States, 10461
        • Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore
      • New York, New York, United States, 10029
        • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 21 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Infants, children and young adults up to and including 21 years of age; young adults (18-21) who are cognitively intact may participate in this study, but their parent(s) or legal guardian(s) must also agree to participate
  • English- or Spanish-speaking parent or legal guardian capable of providing informed consent, participating in surveys, and able to see GUIA;
  • Currently undiagnosed, likely genetic* cause of neurologic, immunologic, or cardiac disorders (*as determined by disorder-specific criteria in Section IIIc. and phenotype checklist Appendix w.)
  • Followed by a physician in the MS or EM systems;
  • Willing and able to return for each study visit (not moving out of the area within nine months)
  • If targeted gene panels and/or whole exome sequencing were previously done, results must have been returned at least three months before enrollment;
  • If targeted gene panels and/or whole exome sequencing were previously done, results must have been negative, or identified only one variant in a potentially causative autosomal recessive gene, and
  • If the parents received genetic counseling about this child, themselves, or a family member, the last genetic counseling session must have been at least three months before enrollment (*if testing was within 6-months their recruitment will be held until they 3-months or after)
  • If patients have undergone karyotyping alone, we do not have to wait 3 months prior to inclusion.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The referred child is currently participating in a different genetic sequencing study, that includes genetic counseling and/or return of results before the participant's ROR2 visit.
  • The referred child has a known or likely molecular genetic diagnosis for their neurologic, immunologic, or cardiac disorder.
  • The referred child has had a bone-marrow transplant.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Traditional Genetic Counseling
Standard of care genetic counseling session
Participants will receive traditional genetic counseling (GC) for the Baseline and Return of Results (ROR1) visits.
Other Names:
  • Traditional Genetic Counseling
Experimental: GUÍA
Standard of care genetic counseling session with Genomic Understanding, Information and Awareness (GUÍA).
Participants will receive traditional genetic counseling (GC) for the Baseline and Return of Results (ROR1) visits.
Other Names:
  • Traditional Genetic Counseling
GUÍA for the ROR1 visit.
Other Names:
  • Communication Tool
  • Genomic Understanding, Information and Awareness

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Perceived understanding of genomic testing results
Time Frame: 3 months
Perceived understanding of genomic testing results. Scale from 1 (very little or none of it) to 5 (understood almost all or all of it) at 3 months
3 months
Perceived understanding of genomic testing results
Time Frame: 9 months
Perceived understanding of genomic testing results. Scale from 1 (very little or none of it) to 5 (understood almost all or all of it) at 3 months
9 months
Perceived confidence explaining genomic testing results
Time Frame: 3 months
Perceived confidence explaining child's genetic test results. Scale from 1 (completely confident) to 5 (not confident at all) at 3 months
3 months
Perceived confidence explaining genomic testing results
Time Frame: 9 months
Perceived confidence explaining child's genetic test results. Scale from 1 (completely confident) to 5 (not confident at all) at 9 months
9 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Objective understanding of genomic testing results
Time Frame: 3 months
Participants will answer yes, no, or not sure/don't remember at 3 months
3 months
Objective understanding of genomic testing results
Time Frame: 9 months
Participants will answer yes, no, or not sure/don't remember at 9 months
9 months
Understanding of recommended medical follow up and actionability of genomic results
Time Frame: 3 months
Participants will answer yes, no, or I don't know/don't remember/unsure
3 months
Adherence to medical follow up recommendations
Time Frame: 9 months
Participants will answer yes, not yet but plan to; or no, and don't plan to; or don't know
9 months
Percent of participants with definitive or likely positive diagnoses
Time Frame: up to 27 months
Diagnostic results assessed by percent of participants with definitive or likely positive diagnoses
up to 27 months
Time to diagnosis of WGS and TGP
Time Frame: up to 27 months
Time to diagnosis comparison of WGS and TGP
up to 27 months
Concordance of WGS and TGP results
Time Frame: up to 27 months
Percent of agreement between WGS and TGP testing results
up to 27 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Eimear Kenny, PhD, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
  • Principal Investigator: Melissa Wasserstein, MD, Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 30, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 28, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

April 28, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 8, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 9, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

November 13, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 13, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 6, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe