Clinical Trial to Improve the Magnetic Levator Prosthesis

Clinical Trial to Improve the Magnetic Levator Prosthesis (MLP) Including the Development and Testing of a Novel Adjustable Force System

Blepharoptosis (incomplete opening of the eyelids) occurs because of a disruption in the normal agonist-antagonist neuro-muscular complex balance. An external device could restore eyelid movement. A newer class of permanent magnets made of alloys of neodymium (Nd), iron (Fe) and boron (B) might provide the technology needed to develop a feasible external magnetic device that could restore eyelid movement.

Study Overview

• Status: Active, not recruiting
• Conditions: Stroke; Myasthenia Gravis; Traumatic Brain Injury; Ptosis, Eyelid; Blepharoptosis
• Intervention / Treatment: Device: Magnetic Levator Prosthesis (MLP)

Detailed Description

Blepharoptosis (incomplete opening of the eyelids) occurs because of a disruption in the normal agonist-antagonist neuro-muscular complex balance. An external device, if able to generate an appropriately balanced force, could restore eyelid movement by performing the paralyzed function; for example, a ptotic (droopy) eyelid could be opened, and the functioning eyelid closure muscle could overcome the device's force (Conway, 1973; Barmettler et. al, 2014; Houston et. al, 2014). Despite this seemingly straight-forward application, permanent magnets for eyelid movement disorders have not thus far become an available treatment. It is possible that earlier magnetic materials lacked the strength (at sizes which were acceptable to patients) to effectively restore the blink, or methods of implantation or external mounting were not effective. A newer class of permanent magnets made of alloys of neodymium (Nd), iron (Fe) and boron (B) might provide the technology needed to develop a feasible external magnetic device. They generate the strongest static magnetic fields yet possible, (1.3T compared to 0.4T of conventional ferrite magnets) (Cyrot, 2005) with exceptional uniaxial magnetocrystalline anisotropy, which makes them resistive to demagnetization (Chikazumui, 1997). The increased magnetic force at a fraction of the size has led to attempts for other medical applications including implantation for gastroesophageal reflux disease (Ganz, 2013), in dental prosthetics (Uribe, 2006), ocular reconstructive surgery (de Negreiros, 2012), and glaucoma (Paschalis et. al, 2013). Problems with extended external non-surgical adhesion to the skin of the eyelid may be solved with hydrocolloid-based medical adhesives e.g. Tegaderm™ (Chen, 1997), already used for IV catheter securement, wound dressing, and as a protective eye covering (FDA, 1997). This material is extremely thin, transparent, and oxygen permeable with an established safety profile for days to weeks of wear. The hydrophyllic properties (FDA, 1997) may be beneficial to the eyelids, which are often moist. In our prior work we established proof-of-concept data demonstrating safety and efficacy for temporary management ptosis up to 2 hour per day for 2 weeks. Due to the sensitive force distance relationship characteristics of magnetic fields and variable nature of ptosis (often worsens throughout the day) the MLP required frequent readjustment and consistent correction was difficult to achieve. Other challenges included lid redness with longer wear times (in the participants who wore the MLP longer than instructed), incomplete spontaneous blinking, and difficultly with self-application of the magnetic lid array to the eye lid. This study aims to address these challenges. In order to improve the MLP we will determine the range of force in the target severe ptosis population to open the lid and where blinking is inhibited, determine the best polarity combination between the lid magnets and the spectacle magnet, determine if rotating the spectacle magnet is a good method to allow simple force adjustment via a dial on the side of the frame, determine if custom made frames improve stability of the frame, and create an applicator tool to help participants apply the lid magnet themselves.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Anticipated): 30
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • Massachusetts
    • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
      • Schepens Eye Research Institute

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 4 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Experimental:
• Presence of ptosis for at least one eye which obscures the visual axis in the resting position (without frontalis drive, lifting with forehead muscles)
• Moderate cognitive function or better defined as greater than or equal to 18 out of 30 on a pre-screening of the Mini-Mental State Exam
• Age 5 or older
• Control/Normal Vision Group:
• Absence of ptosis which obscures the visual axis
• Age 18 or older

Exclusion Criteria:

• Experimental:
• Absence of blepharoptosis or presence of a corneal ulcer.
• Those with a corneal ulcer are at risk for permanent loss of vision and should be managed with proven methods.
• Age less than 5,
• Severe Cognitive impairment defined as MMSE score <18, behaviors consistent with delirium (combinations of disorientation, hallucinations, delusions, and incoherent speech), or lethargy. These individuals must be excluded since participation requires competent self-care, reliable responses and cooperation during fitting of the devices.
• Control/Normal Vision Group:
• Presence of Blepharoptosis
• Age less than 18

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
• Masking: Single

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental Group; The purpose of the experimental group is to test the intervention. Participants will have their acuity measured (refraction as needed), slit lamp with Nafl & NEI scale, visual functioning questionnaire (VFQ), cognitive assessment (MOCA).The eye lid will be prepped and video recorded.The masked clinical staff will then apply the polarized magnets and perform a number of measurements to ascertain effectiveness of intervention. -Intervention - Magnetic Levator Prosthesis (MLP)	Device: Magnetic Levator Prosthesis (MLP); Neodymium magnet embedded in a glasses frame and a polymer embedded (PDMS) micro-magnet array fitted externally to the upper lid with IV 3000 securement film. The IV 3000 is FDA approved for extended wear on the skin. Tegaderm, which is essentially the same adhesive, is even FDA approved as an eye covering (we used Tegaderm in early studies but switched to IV 3000 for its superior ease of handling based on packaging technique).
Other: Control/Normal Vision Group; The purpose of the normal vision group is to test the experimental setup prior to enrolling ptosis patients. If the measurements of the normal vision group are found to be non-different to the experimental group, the data will be pooled. -Intervention - Magnetic Levator Prosthesis (MLP)	Device: Magnetic Levator Prosthesis (MLP); Neodymium magnet embedded in a glasses frame and a polymer embedded (PDMS) micro-magnet array fitted externally to the upper lid with IV 3000 securement film. The IV 3000 is FDA approved for extended wear on the skin. Tegaderm, which is essentially the same adhesive, is even FDA approved as an eye covering (we used Tegaderm in early studies but switched to IV 3000 for its superior ease of handling based on packaging technique).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Change in interpalpebral fissure during eye opening	A > 1mm change in interpalpebral fissure (resting open) at min and max force of the rotatable system; a >1mm change in interpalpebral fissure when the lid array is polarized through thickness as compared to through height.	This outcome will be analysed by reviewing video recording. Video recording will be performed 7 times for the duration of the study (4 videos performed during visit 1; 3 video performed during visit 2)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Change in interpalpebral fissure during the blink	Video analysis to measure the completeness of eye closure with the MLP compared to 1) no device, 2) relative to the contralateral side (if normal), 3) relative to different configurations of the device and custom vs. non-custom frames.	Video recording will be performed 7 times for the duration of the study (4 videos performed during visit 1; 3 video performed during visit 2)

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Kevin Houston, OD, M. Sc., Mass Eye and Ear

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): February 7, 2019
• Primary Completion (Anticipated): July 1, 2023
• Study Completion (Anticipated): July 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: January 23, 2019
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: January 23, 2019
• First Posted (Actual): January 28, 2019

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): April 6, 2022
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: April 4, 2022
• Last Verified: April 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Brain Diseases; Central Nervous System Diseases; Nervous System Diseases; Immune System Diseases; Neoplasms; Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System; Autoimmune Diseases; Neoplasms by Site; Eye Diseases; Wounds and Injuries; Neuromuscular Diseases; Neurodegenerative Diseases; Craniocerebral Trauma; Trauma, Nervous System; Nervous System Neoplasms; Paraneoplastic Syndromes, Nervous System; Paraneoplastic Syndromes; Neuromuscular Junction Diseases; Eyelid Diseases; Brain Injuries; Brain Injuries, Traumatic; Myasthenia Gravis; Blepharoptosis
• Other Study ID Numbers: 18-166H

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No