A Clinical Trial of Extraperitonealization for Prevention of Parastomal Hernia After Ileal Conduit

April 16, 2024 updated by: ZHOU FANGJIAN, Sun Yat-sen University

A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of Extraperitonealization for Prevention of Parastomal Hernia After Ileal Conduit

Many complications may occur after ileal conduit, with the incidence increasing with time after surgery. Nearly half of the complications are related to stoma and ureteroileal anastomosis. The investigators believe that the surgical technique is responsible for these complications, and therefore have devised a modified technique for creating the ileal conduit that should help prevent these complications after surgery. The investigators' retrospective study shows that modified surgical technique for ileal conduit urinary diversion appears to be effective for reducing early and late complications related to the stoma. Thus the investigators would like to perform a prospective multicenter randomized controlled clinical study to prove the investigators' results.

The investigators plan to enroll 104 patients, and randomizedly divide the participants into two groups, with one group 52 patients undergoing conventional ileal conduit, another group 52 patients undergoing modified ileal conduit.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The ileal conduit (Bricker) has been used for urinary diversion for more than half a century. Widely accepted to be a simple and safe form of urinary diversion, it remains one of the most commonly used techniques for urinary diversion after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. However, many complications may occur after ileal conduit, with the incidence increasing with time after surgery. Interestingly, nearly half of the complications are related to stoma and ureteroileal anastomosis. Among the complications, parastomal hernia is the most common. Female gender, low preoperative serum albumin level, high BMI or severe obesity, and prior laparotomy have been shown to be risk factors for parastomal hernia. But the mechanisms by which these variables lead to stoma related complications have not yet been fully elucidated. The investigators believe that the surgical technique is responsible for these complications, and therefore have devised a modified technique for creating the ileal conduit that should help prevent these complications after surgery. The investigators' retrospective study shows that modified surgical technique for ileal conduit urinary diversion appears to be effective for reducing early and late complications related to the stoma. Thus the investigators would like to perform a prospective multicenter randomized controlled clinical study to prove the investigators' results.

The investigators plan to enroll 104 patients, and randomizedly divide the participants into two groups, with one group 52 patients undergoing conventional ileal conduit, another group 52 patients undergoing modified ileal conduit.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

104

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510060
        • Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 18-75 years old, gender not limited, life expectancy is greater than or equal to 24 months;
  2. ECOG score of patients: 0-1;
  3. Volunteer to participate in this study and sign the informed consent;
  4. T2-T4a, N0-x,M0 invasive bladder cancer; High risk non-muscular invasive bladder cancer T1G3(high grade) tumor; Tis in which BCG therapy failed; Recurrent non-invasive bladder cancer; TUR and bladder perfusion were used for treatment of uncontrolled extensive papillary lesions and bladder non-urothelial carcinoma;
  5. Major organ functions, such as liver, kidney, bone marrow, heart and other important organs, were not significantly abnormal: AST, ALT≤2.5 upper limit of normal value (ULN); Total bilirubin (TBIL)≤1.5 ULN; Albumin (ALB)≥25g/L; Serum creatinine (CRE)≤1.5 ULN; Leukocytes≥3.5*109/L, neutrophils≥1.5*109/L, hemoglobin≥90g/L, platelets≥80*109/L; Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥50%; Electrocardiogram showed no obvious abnormality or no clinical significance.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. A history of major middle and lower abdominal surgery;
  2. Obese patients (BMI≥40kg/m2);
  3. Failure to receive regular follow-up review as required;
  4. Severe cardiovascular disease;
  5. History of immunodeficiency and organ transplantation;
  6. History of severe central nervous system disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Modified ileal conduit
With our modified ileal conduit technique
Modified ileal conduit (Extraperitonealization)
No Intervention: Conventional ileal conduit

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of parastomal hernia in 2 years
Time Frame: 2 years
Incidence of parastomal hernia in 2 years
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of stomal retraction in 2 years
Time Frame: 2 years
Incidence of stomal retraction in 2 years
2 years
Incidence of stomal stenosis in 2 years
Time Frame: 2 years
Incidence of stomal stenosis in 2 years
2 years
Incidence of stomal prolapse in 2 years
Time Frame: 2 years
Incidence of stomal prolapse in 2 years
2 years
Overall Survival
Time Frame: up to 2 years. From date of randomization until the date of first documented date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 24 months
Overall Survival
up to 2 years. From date of randomization until the date of first documented date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 24 months
Disease-Free Survival
Time Frame: up to 2 years. From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or recurrence or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 24 months
Disease-Free Survival
up to 2 years. From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or recurrence or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 15, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 11, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

March 11, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 23, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 28, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

January 30, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 18, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 16, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bladder Cancer

Clinical Trials on Modified ileal conduit

3
Subscribe