Diabetic Foot Ulcer and Wound Infection

November 4, 2020 updated by: Uma Gunasekaran, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Remote Glycemic Management for Patients With Diabetic Foot Ulcer and Wound Infection

The goal of the study is to compare whether an integrated model of care between Foot Wound and Diabetes Clinic with use of remote glucose monitoring technology (Intervention Arm), as compared with usual care without the use of remote glucose monitoring technology (Control Arm), will result in 1) improved glycemic control, 2) improved ulcer and wound healing, 3) improved patient reported outcomes (PROs), 4) reduced long-term healthcare resource utilization, and 5) improved adherence to anti-glycemic therapy for patients with DFUWI and poor glycemic control over the course of a 6-month intervention period.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a two-arm non-randomized convenient pilot trial to assess impact of an active glycemic management model through remote glucose monitoring technology amongst patients with DFUWI and poor glycemic control at the Parkland Diabetes Foot & Wound clinic. The plan is to implement a remote glucose monitoring technology to facilitate improved glycemic management and control. A cellular enabled glucose meter that will upload blood glucose measurements to a cloud server accessible by providers who can remotely review glycemic trends and remotely provide patients with proactive recommendations for treatment adjustments will be used. Patients receiving services in the integrated care model (same day visits in the Foot Wound and Diabetes Clinics at Parkland) will be eligible for inclusion in the intervention arm which includes proactive glucose monitoring guided by remote glucose monitoring technology. Patients receiving usual care services (non-integrated care model clinic days where Foot Wound and Diabetes Clinic visits are on separate days) will be eligible for inclusion in the control arm. The expectation is that patients in the intervention arm will experience greater improvements in glycemic control, compared to the usual care model. The hypothesis is that improved glycemic control in these patients will result in faster healing of diabetic foot wound, infections or ulcers. The effectiveness of the technologically facilitated integrated model of care will be evaluated compared to the usual care using metrics for diabetic foot ulcers and wound healing, glycemic control, patient reported outcomes, health resource utilization and medication adherence after 6 months of intervention. The Telcare 2.0 BGM for remote self-blood glucose monitoring(FDA Cleared) will be used.

Study Type

Observational

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75235
        • Parkland Health and Hospital System

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with diabetic foot ulcer &/or wound infection and poor glycemic control (A1C ≥ 8.5%) seen in the Foot Wound clinic at a public hospital.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Type 2 Diabetes
  • 18 years and older
  • A1C greater than or equal to 8.5% within the preceding 6 months
  • A1C greater than 8% on day of enrollment
  • Active diabetic foot ulcer or wound receiving treatment in the Foot Wound clinic at Parkland (ulcer that meets University of Texas Classification Grade 1 or 2 of any stage)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic osteomyelitis (even if completed active therapy)
  • Moderate/severe lower limb infection (per Infectious Diseases Society of America criteria)
  • Diabetic Foot Ulcer and Wound Infection on Charcot Foot
  • Any serious/unstable medical condition that interferes with treatment assignment
  • Ankle Brachial Index less than 0.7 or toe pressures less than 30mmHg
  • Unwilling to participate or receive injectable treatment or unable to keep appointments
  • Non-English or Non-Spanish speakers
  • Pregnant or planning to become pregnant

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention Group
A Telcare 2.0 BGM, which is FDA cleared, will be used to upload blood glucose measurements to a cloud server accessible by providers. Intervention group will participate in an integrated care model where they will attend Diabetic Clinic and Foot Wound appointments on the same day.
Blood glucose meter that uploads blood glucose measurements to a cloud server that providers can access and use to monitor patients' glycemic trends.
Control Group
Control Group will receive usual care (a non-integrated care model where Diabetes Clinic and Foot Wound appointments are on separate days.) These patients will not receive a blood monitoring glucose device.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in HbA1c
Time Frame: 6 months
Mean change in HbA1c from baseline to end of treatment
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Glycemic control
Time Frame: 6 months
Proportion of patients with lower A1C and insulin use
6 months
Foot ulcer and/or wound healing
Time Frame: 6 months
Complete wound healing as defined by University of Texas Health System
6 months
Patient reported satisfaction with diabetes treatment
Time Frame: 6 months
Self-reported outcome assessment questionnaire using the Diabetes Treatment Satisfcation Questionnaire (DTSQ) [Scale range 0-48]; lower scores represent worse outcomes
6 months
Patient reported health status
Time Frame: 6 months
Self-reported outcome assessment questionnaires using the 5 level EQ-5D health status measure (EQ-5D-5L) [Scale range 5-25]; higher scores represent worse outcome
6 months
Proportion of patients with emergency department visits
Time Frame: 6 months
Proportion of patients with emergency department visits following enrollment
6 months
Proportion of days covered score
Time Frame: 6 months
Proportion of days covered score represents an indirect measure of medication adherence and represents the proportion of days medication was dispensed (numerator) over the total potential days the medication should have been dispensed (denominator)
6 months
Proportion of patients with hospitalization
Time Frame: 6 months
Proportion of patients with hospitalization following enrollment
6 months
Frequency of invasive procedures
Time Frame: 6 months
Total number and type of invasive procedures related to diabetic foot ulcer and or wound infection
6 months
Number of outpatient visits
Time Frame: 6 months
Total number of outpatient visits for general or specialized care (including virtual visits) during trial
6 months
Number of casts and boots used for treatment
Time Frame: 6 months
Total number of casts and boots used for treatment related to diabetic foot ulcer and or wound infection
6 months
Overall hospital incurred patient-specific cost
Time Frame: 6 months
Cost (in US $) of overall patient care for Parkland during study enrollment
6 months
Cost of glycemic management during study
Time Frame: 6 months
• Cost of glycemic management during trial, including cost of encounters (including telephone and virtual visits), testing supplies, drug costs, technology costs specifically related to glycemic management
6 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Frequency of hypoglycemic events
Time Frame: 6 months
Comparison of frequency of severe hypoglycemic symptoms for usual care versus intervention arm
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Uma Gunasekaran, MD, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

July 9, 2019

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

April 1, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

April 2, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 17, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 30, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

February 4, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

November 6, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 4, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes

Clinical Trials on Telcare 2.0 BGM

3
Subscribe