Health After eaRly Menopause Due to Oophorectomy (HARMOny)

September 10, 2020 updated by: The Netherlands Cancer Institute

Favourable and Unfavourable Health Effects of Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy in Women With a High Genetic Risk of Ovarian Cancer

Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy (RRSO) at the age of 35 to 45 years is recommended for women with a high genetic risk for ovarian cancer. While this procedure decreases the risk of ovarian cancer by 80-96%, it also results in an immediate menopause. Current research on potential adverse effects of premenopausal risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy, such as increased risk of cardiovascular disease, compromised bone health, cognitive dysfunction and reduced quality of life, is limited, mostly due to short follow up.

The investigators will conduct a multicenter cross-sectional study nested in a cohort of BRCA mutation carriers from 8 Dutch centers for hereditary cancer. Eligible participants are women who underwent RRSO before the age of 45. The participants will be frequency-matched on current age with women above the age of 55 without RRSO or with RRSO after the age of 55. Participants will complete an online questionnaire containing various questions about lifestyle, medical history, risk factors for cardiovascular disease, bone health, cognition and quality of life. Participants will be asked to visit one of the participating hospitals for a blood test, a cardiovascular assessment and a DEXA scan for determining bone mineral density. Afterwards participants will be requested to perform the online Amsterdam Cognition Scale.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Rationale: Women at high genetic risk of ovarian cancer are advised to undergo risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) at ages 35-45 years. Currently, in the Netherlands ~500 women/ year opt for RRSO, which minimizes ovarian cancer risk and may decrease breast cancer (BC) risk as well, due to reduced gonadal hormone levels. Besides favorable effects of RRSO on ovarian cancer and, potentially, BC risk, RRSO induces immediate menopause, which may have unfavorable long-term health consequences. Early menopause has been associated with increased risks of cardiovascular disease (CVD), lower bone mineral density (BMD), cognitive impairment, and decreased quality of life. Current evidence regarding these health effects is mainly based on women with a natural early menopause, and it is unknown whether these results hold for women undergoing RRSO at early premenopausal ages.

Objective: The investigators will investigate long-term health effects of premenopausal RRSO on (subclinical) cardiovascular status, BMD, cognition and quality of life.

Study design: the investigators will assess long-term health effects of RRSO in a cross-sectional study, among 500 women who underwent premenopausal RRSO compared to 250 women of the same age without RRSO (or with RRSO after age 55). Eligible women will be invited to participate in a screening program assessing cardiovascular status, bone mineral density, cognitive functioning and quality of life.

Study population: Women are eligible for the premenopausal RRSO group if:

  • RRSO before the age of 45 years;
  • RRSO was done 10 or more years ago; Women are eligible for the comparison group without premenopausal RRSO if the participant did not undergo RRSO before the age of 55 years, and did not have a natural or therapy induced menopause before age 50.

Primary study outcome: To study long-term effects of premenopausal RRSO on:

  • (subclinical) CVD
  • BMD
  • Cognition

Secondary study outcome: To study long-term effects of premenopausal RRSO on:

  • Quality of life
  • Urogenital problems
  • Cardiovascular risk factors

Furthermore, the investigators will examine the influence of age at RRSO, time since RRSO, hormone replacement therapy (HRT), carrier ship of a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation and BC history on the outcome.

The obtained knowledge will assist physicians in counselling women with high ovarian cancer risk and help them to make well-informed decisions.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

750

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1066CX
        • Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

55 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Women are eligible if they underwent RRSO before age 45 and the RRSO was done 10 or more years ago (early RRSO group) and women are eligible as control group if they did not undergo RRSO, or underwent RRSO after age 55 while reaching natural menopause after the age of 50 years. The comparison group will be frequency-matched with the RRSO group on categories of calendar year of birth, and breast cancer history. For each patient with breast cancer, the investigators will perform individual matching accounting for age at breast cancer diagnosis and carrier status. For the early RRSO group the investigators select women who underwent RRSO at least 10 years ago and are currently older than 55 years because the investigators expect subclinical atherosclerosis not to manifest earlier.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • RRSO before age 45
  • RRSO after age 55
  • no RRSO

Exclusion Criteria:

  • metastatic disease
  • Premature ovarian insufficiency
  • Physical or mental problems interfering with a outpatient visit
  • nonbioabsorbable cardiac stent
  • insufficient understanding of the Dutch language

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Early-RRSO
  • RRSO before the age of 45 years
  • RRSO was done 10 or more years ago
Testing for possible unfavourable health effects of early surgical menopause
Other Names:
  • Blood sampling
  • DXA-scan
  • Vertebral Fracture Assessment
  • Online cognition test (Amsterdam Cognition Scale)
  • Quality of life questionnaire
Late-/non-RRSO group
  • Natural menopause ≥ 50 years of age
  • No RRSO ≤ age of 55
  • No treatment-induced menopause ≤ 50 years of age
Testing for possible unfavourable health effects of early surgical menopause
Other Names:
  • Blood sampling
  • DXA-scan
  • Vertebral Fracture Assessment
  • Online cognition test (Amsterdam Cognition Scale)
  • Quality of life questionnaire

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
What is the prevalence of atherosclerotic diseases in women with RRSO compared to women with a high genetic risk of ovarian cancer with a natural menopause as assessed by coronary artery calcium scoring in agatston units
Time Frame: 4 years
Due to the lack of estrogen we expect more atherosclerotic diseases.
4 years
What is the prevalence of atherosclerotic diseases in women with RRSO compared to women with a high genetic risk of ovarian cancer with a natural menopause as assessed by pulse wave velocity in meters/second
Time Frame: 4 years
Due to the lack of estrogen we expect more atherosclerotic diseases.
4 years
What is the prevalence of atherosclerotic diseases in women with RRSO compared to women with a high genetic risk of ovarian cancer with a natural menopause as assessed by high-sensitive CRP in miligram/liter
Time Frame: 4 years
Due to the lack of estrogen we expect more atherosclerotic diseases.
4 years
What is the prevalence of atherosclerotic diseases in women with RRSO compared to women with a high genetic risk of ovarian cancer with a natural menopause as assessed by high-sensitive cardial Troponine T in microgram/liter
Time Frame: 4 years
Due to the lack of estrogen we expect more atherosclerotic diseases.
4 years
What is the prevalence of osteoporosis in women with a premenopausal RRSO compared to women with a high genetic risk of ovarian cancer with a natural menopause as assessed by dual-energy X-ray absoptiometry in T- and Z-scores
Time Frame: 4 years
Loss of estrogen can result in more activity of osteoclasts and less activity of osteoblasts, The DXA-scan is corrected for age, with lower values representing a worse outcome
4 years
What is the prevalence of osteoporosis in women with a premenopausal RRSO compared to women with a high genetic risk of ovarian cancer with a natural menopause as assessed by instant vertebral assessment
Time Frame: 4 years
Loss of estrogen can result in more activity of osteoclasts and less activity of osteoblasts
4 years
What is the prevalence of osteoporosis in women with a premenopausal RRSO compared to women with a high genenetic risk of ovarian cancer with a natural menopause as assessed by beta-CTX in picogram/mililiter
Time Frame: 4 years
Loss of estrogen can result in more activity of osteoclasts and less activity of osteoblasts
4 years
What is the prevalence of osteoporosis in women with a premenopausal RRSO compared to women with a high genenetic risk of ovarian cancer with a natural menopause as assessed by P1NP in miligram/liter
Time Frame: 4 years
Loss of estrogen can result in more activity of osteoclasts and less activity of osteoblasts
4 years
What is the prevalence of cognitive decline in women with RRSO compared to women with a natural menopause as assessed by the Amsterdam Cognition Scan
Time Frame: 4 years
There are some studies suggesting that an early menopause has an influence on cognition
4 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of life after a premenopausal RRSO compared to women from families with a high genetic risk of ovarian cancer with a natural menopause as assessed by validated questionnaires such as the SF-36
Time Frame: 4 years
How do women with a premenopausal RRSO experience their life. The SF-36 questionnaire ranges from 36 to 149, with higher values representing a worse outcome
4 years
Quality of life after a premenopausal RRSO compared to women from families with a high genetic risk of ovarian cancer with a natural menopause as assessed by validated questionnaires such as the EORTC-QLQ BR23.
Time Frame: 4 years
How do women with a premenopausal RRSO experience their life. We measure the body image using the EORTC QLQ BR23, with ranges from 2 to 8, with higher values representing a worse outcome
4 years
Quality of life after a premenopausal RRSO compared to women from families with a high genetic risk of ovarian cancer with a natural menopause as assessed by validated questionnaires such as the FACT-ES
Time Frame: 4 years
How do women with a premenopausal RRSO experience their life. The FACT-ES questionnaire ranges from 0 to 76, with higher values representing a worse outcome
4 years
What is the prevalence of urogenital problems in women with a RRSO compared to women with a natural menopause as assessed by validated questionnaires such as the SAQ
Time Frame: 4 years

Have women with a premenopausal RRSO more urogenital complaints due to longer duration of estrogen deficiency.

The SAQ questionnaire scale has questions with different weights as described in Thirlaway et al. 1996

4 years
What is the prevalence of urogenital problems in women with a RRSO compared to women with a natural menopause as assessed by validated questionnaires such as the UDI-6
Time Frame: 4 years

Have women with a premenopausal RRSO more urogenital complaints due to longer duration of estrogen deficiency.

The UDI-6 questionnaire scale has a range from 0 to 18, with higher values representing a worse outcome

4 years
What is the prevalence of urogenital problems in women with a RRSO compared to women with a natural menopause as assessed by validated questionnaires such as the IIQ-7
Time Frame: 4 years

Have women with a premenopausal RRSO more urogenital complaints due to longer duration of estrogen deficiency.

The IIQ-7 questionnaire scale has a range from 0 to 24, with higher values representing a worse outcome

4 years
What is the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in women with RRSO compared to women with a high genetic risk of ovarian cancer as assessed by a questionnaire.
Time Frame: 4 years
Are some risk factors for cardiovascular disease more prevalent in women with a premenopausal RRSO
4 years

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
What is the effect of premenopausal RRSO on risk of (contralateral) breast cancer and breast cancer-specific survival as assessed in a prospective setting within a well established cohort.
Time Frame: 4 years
we will study the effect of RRSO on BC, contralateral breast cancer and ovarian cancer risk and prognosis after BC/ovarian cancer
4 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Flora E van Leeuwen, Phd, NKI-AVL

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 11, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 30, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 19, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

February 11, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 14, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 10, 2020

Last Verified

September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiovascular Diseases

Clinical Trials on CAC-score

3
Subscribe