An Adaptive Intervention for Adolescents at Risk for Suicide: A Pilot SMART

May 6, 2021 updated by: Ewa Czyz, University of Michigan

Developing an Adaptive Intervention for Suicidal Adolescents Following Inpatient Hospitalization: A Pilot SMART

To inform the development of a technology-augmented adaptive intervention for adolescents at risk for suicide, the goal of this study is to conduct a Sequential, Multiple Assignment, Randomized Trial (SMART) pilot of a Motivational Interview (MI)-enhanced safety planning intervention (MI-SafeCope). Findings from this study will provide the groundwork for the construction of a technology-augmented adaptive intervention that could lead to a reduction in suicidal behaviors and related events during the high-risk post-discharge period-an important suicide prevention target.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

82

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
        • University of Michigan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

13 years to 17 years (CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Suicide attempt (previous month), and/or
  • Suicidal ideation (previous week)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe cognitive impairment or altered mental status (psychosis, manic state)
  • Transfer to medical unit or residential placement
  • No availability of a legal guardian
  • No cell phone with text messaging capability

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: SEQUENTIAL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Safety plan + booster text messages + booster call (Group A)
Sequencing of MI-SafeCope intervention components (Phase 1 and Phase 2) resulting in Group A: Participants will receive the in-person MI-enhanced safety plan (individual meeting with the adolescent and a family meeting) during hospitalization -- focused on developing a personalized list of coping strategies and enhancing adolescents' motivation and self-efficacy to utilize these strategies-- which will be followed by 4 weeks of daily post-discharge booster text messages and a phone booster call.
The MI-enhanced safety plan intervention component is delivered during hospitalization and includes an individual and family meetings. The goal of the individual meeting with the adolescent is to develop an individualized safety plan for use during a suicidal crisis. This "best practices" approach of safety planning is augmented with Motivational Interviewing (MI) as a core strategy to explicitly elicit adolescents' motivation and commitment to behavior change (i.e. use safety plan; adaptive coping), address barriers or ambivalence, and strengthen self-efficacy. The focus of the family meeting, which is similarly guided by MI, is to prepare parents/guardians, with input from the adolescent, for how they may support the adolescent in implementing the individualized safety plan after discharge and on strengthening parents' commitment and self-efficacy.
For participants randomized to receive text boosters, booster text messages will be sent daily for 4 weeks. The messages will be tailored to encourage use of individualized coping strategies identified as part of safety planning at hospitalization and will include additional adaptive coping tools and resources. The text message content and tone will be consistent with principles of MI.
The focus of the post-discharge booster phone call with adolescent and with parent, each conducted separately, will be to to further adjust the safety plan to better meet post-discharge needs, to further enhance adolescents' motivation and commitment to use coping strategies, and to further support adolescents' and parents' self-efficacy to manage suicidal crises.
Other: Safety plan + booster text messages (Group B)
Sequencing of MI-SafeCope intervention components (Phase 1 and Phase 2) resulting in Group B: Participants will receive the in-person MI-enhanced safety plan during hospitalization followed by 4 weeks of daily booster text messages post discharge.
The MI-enhanced safety plan intervention component is delivered during hospitalization and includes an individual and family meetings. The goal of the individual meeting with the adolescent is to develop an individualized safety plan for use during a suicidal crisis. This "best practices" approach of safety planning is augmented with Motivational Interviewing (MI) as a core strategy to explicitly elicit adolescents' motivation and commitment to behavior change (i.e. use safety plan; adaptive coping), address barriers or ambivalence, and strengthen self-efficacy. The focus of the family meeting, which is similarly guided by MI, is to prepare parents/guardians, with input from the adolescent, for how they may support the adolescent in implementing the individualized safety plan after discharge and on strengthening parents' commitment and self-efficacy.
For participants randomized to receive text boosters, booster text messages will be sent daily for 4 weeks. The messages will be tailored to encourage use of individualized coping strategies identified as part of safety planning at hospitalization and will include additional adaptive coping tools and resources. The text message content and tone will be consistent with principles of MI.
Other: Safety plan + booster call (Group C)
Sequencing of MI-SafeCope intervention components (Phase 1 and Phase 2) resulting in Group C: Participants will receive the in-person MI-enhanced safety plan during hospitalization followed by a post-discharge booster call.
The MI-enhanced safety plan intervention component is delivered during hospitalization and includes an individual and family meetings. The goal of the individual meeting with the adolescent is to develop an individualized safety plan for use during a suicidal crisis. This "best practices" approach of safety planning is augmented with Motivational Interviewing (MI) as a core strategy to explicitly elicit adolescents' motivation and commitment to behavior change (i.e. use safety plan; adaptive coping), address barriers or ambivalence, and strengthen self-efficacy. The focus of the family meeting, which is similarly guided by MI, is to prepare parents/guardians, with input from the adolescent, for how they may support the adolescent in implementing the individualized safety plan after discharge and on strengthening parents' commitment and self-efficacy.
The focus of the post-discharge booster phone call with adolescent and with parent, each conducted separately, will be to to further adjust the safety plan to better meet post-discharge needs, to further enhance adolescents' motivation and commitment to use coping strategies, and to further support adolescents' and parents' self-efficacy to manage suicidal crises.
Other: Safety plan (Group D)
Sequencing of MI-SafeCope intervention components (Phase 1 and Phase 2) resulting in Group D: Participants will receive the in-person MI-enhanced safety plan during hospitalization.
The MI-enhanced safety plan intervention component is delivered during hospitalization and includes an individual and family meetings. The goal of the individual meeting with the adolescent is to develop an individualized safety plan for use during a suicidal crisis. This "best practices" approach of safety planning is augmented with Motivational Interviewing (MI) as a core strategy to explicitly elicit adolescents' motivation and commitment to behavior change (i.e. use safety plan; adaptive coping), address barriers or ambivalence, and strengthen self-efficacy. The focus of the family meeting, which is similarly guided by MI, is to prepare parents/guardians, with input from the adolescent, for how they may support the adolescent in implementing the individualized safety plan after discharge and on strengthening parents' commitment and self-efficacy.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Eligible Participants Recruited to the Study
Time Frame: At time of study enrollment, measured following study consent/assent

Eligible participants were candidates for participation based on medical record review who were approached for consent/assent.

The percentage of eligible participants who consented to the study is presented below.

At time of study enrollment, measured following study consent/assent
Percentage of Randomized Participants Who Complete Intervention Components Will be Used to Assess Feasibility and Acceptability
Time Frame: Following intervention, measured up to 1 month
Outcome measure is showing percentage of randomized adolescent participants who complete intervention components to assess feasibility and acceptability
Following intervention, measured up to 1 month
Percentage of Participants Who Complete Study Assessments Will be Used to Assess Feasibility and Acceptability
Time Frame: Following intervention and follow-up assessment, measured up to 3 months
Percentage of participants who complete study assessments, including daily surveys, one month and three month follow ups are used to assess feasibility and acceptability
Following intervention and follow-up assessment, measured up to 3 months
Satisfaction Ratings Will be Used to Assess Acceptability
Time Frame: Following intervention and follow-up assessment, measured up to 3 months
Satisfaction was scored by responses to two questions: How satisfied were you? on a 4 point scale, where 1 means very dissatisfied and 4 means very satisfied and how likely would you be to recommend this program to a friend in similar circumstances, on the same point scale, where 1 means definitely not and 4 means definitely yes
Following intervention and follow-up assessment, measured up to 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 14, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 7, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

April 7, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 6, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 8, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

February 12, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 28, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2021

Last Verified

May 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Suicide

3
Subscribe