Central Venous Access Device Removal in Cancer Patients

August 3, 2020 updated by: Koen Van Eygen, General Hospital Groeninge

Frequency of Central Venous Port Catheter Removal Due to Suspected Infection in Patients Diagnosed With Cancer at a Single Institution: A Retrospective Study.

Background:

Central venous catheters are frequently used during cancer treatment with the aim of venepreservation. It can facilitate venous access for the safe administration of irritating or vesicant intravenous cancer medications and / or other fluids, to collect blood samples or to ensure accurate venous access for contrast during medical imaging. In addition, this means more comfort for the patient who needs to be punctured less peripherally. However, central venous catheters can also be a source of bloodstream infections and other complications, leading to increased morbidity and hospital costs (1). In our hospital, there is a general practice that if an infection of the device is suspected, the central venous catheter should be removed if antibiotics do not seem or prove to be effective.

The objective of this trial is to assess the frequency of implanted port catheter-removal in cancer patients due to suspected infection of the device in a particular oncology center over a time period of seven years. Furthermore, evidence for real device infections (per/post-surgery) and the potential contribution of different (institution-specific) risk factors on device infection will be explored. There will be focused on implanted port catheters only, as this is the main used central venous access device within the oncological population.

Trial objectives:

The primary aim of this retrospective descriptive trial is to evaluate the frequency of implanted port catheter-removal in cancer patients due to suspected infection of the device, over a time period of seven years.

The secondary aim is to examine whether the device infection could be confirmed during or after removal of the device.

At last, the tertiary aim is to verify whether certain variables can be denoted as potential risk factors for central venous access infection. Selection of those variables of interest will be based on a thorough review of the literature and discussion with the responsible healthcare professionals.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

1402

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Kortrijk, Belgium
        • GHGroeninge

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

We are interested in cancer patients who were implanted a central venous access device with regard to their cancer treatment, but for which the device was removed.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Central venous access device removal in our general hospital
  • Cancer patient

Exclusion Criteria:

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Suspected infection rate
Time Frame: 2012-2017
How many central venous access devices are removed due to a suspected infection of the device in cancer patients.
2012-2017

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Approved infection rate
Time Frame: 2012-2017
For how many of the central venous access devices that were removed due to suspected infection of the device could an infection be confirmed?
2012-2017
Risk factors for central venous access device infections in cancer patients
Time Frame: 2012-2017
Is it possible to denote certain variables as potential risk factors for central venous access device infection?
2012-2017

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 25, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 25, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

February 27, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 5, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 3, 2020

Last Verified

August 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • AZGS2018106

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data will not be made publically and shared with other researchers.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Oncology

Clinical Trials on Removal of a central venous access device

3
Subscribe