Fractional Laser Assisted Delivery of Sculptra® for the Treatment of Striae (FADeS)

August 24, 2021 updated by: aamir siddiqui, Henry Ford Health System

Fractional Laser Assisted Delivery of Sculptra® for the Treatment of Striae: FADeS Trial

This study evaluates the efficacy of treatment of striae distensae using the combined modality of fractional laser and poly-L lactic acid (Sculptra).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Striae Distensae (SD) is a form of scarring that can oftentimes be quite disfiguring and emotionally distressing to individuals.

Fractional laser therapy has been used by doctors to treat stretch marks by stimulating collagen growth.

Poly-L lactic acid also promotes collagen growth in the areas injected.

The combination of laser and poly-L lactic acid might provide the optimal treatment modality for SD by decreasing the appearance of atrophic scars.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

10

Phase

  • Early Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Michigan
      • Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48202
        • Henry Ford Health System

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject has bilateral striae alba
  • Subject has stable body weight for at least 6 months with Fitzpatrick skin type 1-4

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject has striae rubra
  • Pregnant
  • History of adverse effects to phototherapy
  • Subject has single sided lesions
  • Subject has immunosuppression
  • Subject has radiation therapy to the study area
  • Subject has topical or oral steroid use or chemotherapy within the last 6 months
  • History of keloids or hypertrophic scar

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Fractional laser treatment & Poly-L Lactic Acid (Sculptra)
One Fractional laser treatment on half of the body with Sciton Laser and Scluptra
After initial treatment, reassessment will be conducted at 3 follow-up visits. Photographs will be taken for blinded evaluators to compare post-treatment to the original pre-treatment photographs. At final visit, a questionnaire will be administered to rate treatment satisfaction.
Other Names:
  • Sculptra
After initial treatment, reassessment will be conducted at 3 follow-up visits. Photographs will be taken for blinded evaluators to compare post-treatment to the original pre-treatment photographs. At final visit, a questionnaire will be administered to rate treatment satisfaction.
Other Names:
  • Sciton Laser
Active Comparator: Fractional laser treatment
One Fractional laser treatment on half of the body with Sciton Laser
After initial treatment, reassessment will be conducted at 3 follow-up visits. Photographs will be taken for blinded evaluators to compare post-treatment to the original pre-treatment photographs. At final visit, a questionnaire will be administered to rate treatment satisfaction.
Other Names:
  • Sciton Laser

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Stretch Mark Size
Time Frame: Baseline (Pre-treatment) vs. 3 Months, 4 Months, 5 Months, 6 Months
Modified Manchester Scar Scale was used to assess stretch mark reduction compared to pre-treatment photographs. The range of each subscale is between 4-26. A higher value represents a worse outcome. A value of 26 is the maximum score and represents the worst outcome. A value of 4 is the minimum score and represents the best outcome. Subscales are then summed to compute a total score.
Baseline (Pre-treatment) vs. 3 Months, 4 Months, 5 Months, 6 Months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Treatments Superiority Assessment
Time Frame: 3 Months
Modified Manchester Scar Scale was used to assess and judge whether erbium-YAG fractionated laser therapy plus Sculptra is superior to laser therapy alone. The range of each subscale is between 4-26. A higher value represents a worse outcome. A value of 26 is the maximum score and represents the worst outcome. A value of 4 is the minimum score and represents the best outcome. Subscales are then summed to compute a total score.
3 Months
Treatments Superiority Assessment
Time Frame: 4 Months
Modified Manchester Scar Scale was used to assess and judge whether erbium-YAG fractionated laser therapy plus Sculptra is superior to laser therapy alone. The range of each subscale is between 4-26. A higher value represents a worse outcome. A value of 26 is the maximum score and represents the worst outcome. A value of 4 is the minimum score and represents the best outcome. Subscales are then summed to compute a total score.
4 Months
Treatments Superiority Assessment
Time Frame: 5 Months
Modified Manchester Scar Scale was used to assess and judge whether erbium-YAG fractionated laser therapy plus Sculptra is superior to laser therapy alone. The range of each subscale is between 4-26. A higher value represents a worse outcome. A value of 26 is the maximum score and represents the worst outcome. A value of 4 is the minimum score and represents the best outcome. Subscales are then summed to compute a total score.
5 Months
Treatments Superiority Assessment
Time Frame: 6 Months
Modified Manchester Scar Scale was used to assess and judge whether erbium-YAG fractionated laser therapy plus Sculptra is superior to laser therapy alone. The range of each subscale is between 4-26. A higher value represents a worse outcome. A value of 26 is the maximum score and represents the worst outcome. A value of 4 is the minimum score and represents the best outcome. Subscales are then summed to compute a total score.
6 Months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 15, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 31, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

January 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 18, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 27, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

February 28, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 26, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 24, 2021

Last Verified

August 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 11951

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Striae Distensae

Clinical Trials on Poly-L Lactic Acid

3
Subscribe