- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03858543
Fractional Laser Assisted Delivery of Sculptra® for the Treatment of Striae (FADeS)
Fractional Laser Assisted Delivery of Sculptra® for the Treatment of Striae: FADeS Trial
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Striae Distensae (SD) is a form of scarring that can oftentimes be quite disfiguring and emotionally distressing to individuals.
Fractional laser therapy has been used by doctors to treat stretch marks by stimulating collagen growth.
Poly-L lactic acid also promotes collagen growth in the areas injected.
The combination of laser and poly-L lactic acid might provide the optimal treatment modality for SD by decreasing the appearance of atrophic scars.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Early Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Michigan
-
Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48202
- Henry Ford Health System
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subject has bilateral striae alba
- Subject has stable body weight for at least 6 months with Fitzpatrick skin type 1-4
Exclusion Criteria:
- Subject has striae rubra
- Pregnant
- History of adverse effects to phototherapy
- Subject has single sided lesions
- Subject has immunosuppression
- Subject has radiation therapy to the study area
- Subject has topical or oral steroid use or chemotherapy within the last 6 months
- History of keloids or hypertrophic scar
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Fractional laser treatment & Poly-L Lactic Acid (Sculptra)
One Fractional laser treatment on half of the body with Sciton Laser and Scluptra
|
After initial treatment, reassessment will be conducted at 3 follow-up visits.
Photographs will be taken for blinded evaluators to compare post-treatment to the original pre-treatment photographs.
At final visit, a questionnaire will be administered to rate treatment satisfaction.
Other Names:
After initial treatment, reassessment will be conducted at 3 follow-up visits.
Photographs will be taken for blinded evaluators to compare post-treatment to the original pre-treatment photographs.
At final visit, a questionnaire will be administered to rate treatment satisfaction.
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Fractional laser treatment
One Fractional laser treatment on half of the body with Sciton Laser
|
After initial treatment, reassessment will be conducted at 3 follow-up visits.
Photographs will be taken for blinded evaluators to compare post-treatment to the original pre-treatment photographs.
At final visit, a questionnaire will be administered to rate treatment satisfaction.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in Stretch Mark Size
Time Frame: Baseline (Pre-treatment) vs. 3 Months, 4 Months, 5 Months, 6 Months
|
Modified Manchester Scar Scale was used to assess stretch mark reduction compared to pre-treatment photographs.
The range of each subscale is between 4-26.
A higher value represents a worse outcome.
A value of 26 is the maximum score and represents the worst outcome.
A value of 4 is the minimum score and represents the best outcome.
Subscales are then summed to compute a total score.
|
Baseline (Pre-treatment) vs. 3 Months, 4 Months, 5 Months, 6 Months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Treatments Superiority Assessment
Time Frame: 3 Months
|
Modified Manchester Scar Scale was used to assess and judge whether erbium-YAG fractionated laser therapy plus Sculptra is superior to laser therapy alone.
The range of each subscale is between 4-26.
A higher value represents a worse outcome.
A value of 26 is the maximum score and represents the worst outcome.
A value of 4 is the minimum score and represents the best outcome.
Subscales are then summed to compute a total score.
|
3 Months
|
Treatments Superiority Assessment
Time Frame: 4 Months
|
Modified Manchester Scar Scale was used to assess and judge whether erbium-YAG fractionated laser therapy plus Sculptra is superior to laser therapy alone.
The range of each subscale is between 4-26.
A higher value represents a worse outcome.
A value of 26 is the maximum score and represents the worst outcome.
A value of 4 is the minimum score and represents the best outcome.
Subscales are then summed to compute a total score.
|
4 Months
|
Treatments Superiority Assessment
Time Frame: 5 Months
|
Modified Manchester Scar Scale was used to assess and judge whether erbium-YAG fractionated laser therapy plus Sculptra is superior to laser therapy alone.
The range of each subscale is between 4-26.
A higher value represents a worse outcome.
A value of 26 is the maximum score and represents the worst outcome.
A value of 4 is the minimum score and represents the best outcome.
Subscales are then summed to compute a total score.
|
5 Months
|
Treatments Superiority Assessment
Time Frame: 6 Months
|
Modified Manchester Scar Scale was used to assess and judge whether erbium-YAG fractionated laser therapy plus Sculptra is superior to laser therapy alone.
The range of each subscale is between 4-26.
A higher value represents a worse outcome.
A value of 26 is the maximum score and represents the worst outcome.
A value of 4 is the minimum score and represents the best outcome.
Subscales are then summed to compute a total score.
|
6 Months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 11951
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Striae Distensae
-
First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan UniversityScience and Technology Program of Guangzhou,Guangzhou Sipintang Biological...UnknownTreatments of Striae DistensaeChina
-
Kasr El Aini HospitalCompleted
-
First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan UniversityScience and Technology Program of GuangzhouUnknownTreatments of Striae GravidarumChina
-
Jose R. Reyes Memorial Medical CenterCompletedStriae GravidarumPhilippines
-
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesCompletedExcimer Laser | White StriaeIran, Islamic Republic of
-
Al-Azhar UniversityRecruiting
-
American University of Beirut Medical CenterWellcome TrustCompleted
-
Brazilan Center for Studies in DermatologyCompletedTreatment | Striae | Stretch MarksBrazil
-
Candela FranceCompleted
-
Mahidol UniversityUnknown
Clinical Trials on Poly-L Lactic Acid
-
Galderma R&DCompletedWrinkles in DecolletageUnited States
-
Bausch Health Americas, Inc.Completed
-
Galderma Brasil Ltda.Completed
-
Bausch Health Americas, Inc.Completed
-
Bausch Health Americas, Inc.CompletedFacial LipoatrophyUnited States
-
Bausch Health Americas, Inc.CompletedNasolabial Fold WrinklesUnited States
-
Bausch Health Americas, Inc.CompletedNasolabial Fold WrinklesUnited States
-
Erevna Innovations Inc.Completed
-
Bausch Health Americas, Inc.Completed
-
Bausch Health Americas, Inc.CompletedMid Facial Contour DeficienciesUnited Kingdom