Assessment of Performance and Safety of an Asymmetric Balloon in the Treatment of Intranasal Bleeding Managed in an Emergency Setting (BATSI)

August 30, 2019 updated by: Dianosic

Between 10 and 12% of the general population suffers from epistaxis, out of which 10% would need to be medically managed. Most of patients treated for epistaxis are managed through emergency departments. The involvement of the ENT (ear, nose and throat) surgeon might be required in more complex situations in order to control bleeding.

Usually, nasal packing packing is used as a first line option after failure of digital compression. Epistaxis balloons are often used after failure of nasal packing Balloons are effective in approximately 60% of the patients with a rapid control of bleeding by compression followed by an absence of rebreeding after balloon removal.

The main challenges for patients treated with this device are i) pain upon balloon introduction and inflation ii) discomfort upon introduction in the nasal cavity as well as during balloon maintenance during 24 to 72 hours of tamponade iii) blood retention between distal and proximal balloons that favors infection iv) limited breathing capabilities through the nostrils which increases general discomfort v) negative aesthetic impact for the patient vi) septal and alar necrosis risk in case of prolonged compression.

Moreover, epistaxis leading to an hospitalization between 24 to 48h are not rare (>11 000 in France in 2017 according to ATIH). Those hospitalizations are often decided in order to ensure an optimal patient monitoring following packing or epistaxis balloon placement.

In order to address those adverse events while keeping the same efficacy and avoiding hospitalizations or reducing their duration, the use of an asymmetric, more physiological, easy to use and mainly intranasal (discreet proximal extremity) is studied.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Grand Est
      • Strasbourg, Grand Est, France, 67000
        • CHU Strasbourg

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > or = 18 years
  • Male and female
  • bleeding uncontrolled with digital compression
  • Patient registered at social security
  • Patient who gave informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergy to xylocaine
  • Impossibility to give patient information (severe massive epistaxis, difficulty to understand, non awaken patient…)
  • Patient in custody of court
  • Patient under guardianship or curator

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: asymmetric balloon
Asymmetric air filled (max 25 cc, Leur lock syringe) epistaxis balloon
Asymmetric balloon for treatment of intranasal bleeding
Other Names:
  • epistaxis balloon

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Device performance
Time Frame: 12 days
Absence of bleeding following balloon inflation during first 48 hours and absence of rebreeding following removal at 48 hours and 9 days following removal
12 days
Device safety
Time Frame: 12 days
Pain score on a VAS (Visual Analogic Scale)
12 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
QoL
Time Frame: 12 days
RhinoQoL (Rhino Quality of Life) score
12 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Christian Debry, Pr, CHU Strasbourg (Univ Hosp Strasbourg)

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 27, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

July 18, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 8, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 9, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

April 11, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 3, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 30, 2019

Last Verified

August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Epistaxis

Clinical Trials on asymmetric balloon

3
Subscribe