Neural Mechanisms of Cannabinoid-impaired Decision-Making in Emerging Adults

March 8, 2024 updated by: Michael J. Wesley, PhD
Emerging adults are a particularly vulnerable group for experiencing the immediate and potentially lifelong negative impacts of habitual cannabis use, and trends suggest that cannabis use disorder (CUD) will soon escalate in this population. The proposed research will combine clinical pharmacology, non-invasive brain stimulation, and neuroimaging techniques to establish the brain mechanisms of cannabinoid-impaired decision-making processes in emerging adults with CUD. Results from this project will inform CUD prevention/treatment efforts in this high-risk group and address a growing public health concern.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This mentored career development award (K01) will enable Dr. Michael J. Wesley to achieve his long-term goal of becoming an independent investigator with a clinical research program examining cannabis use disorder (CUD) in emerging adults, which is a current NIDA funding priority. Dr. Wesley is a new Assistant Professor at the University of Kentucky (UK) College of Medicine. The activities proposed in this award build on Dr. Wesley's background in neuroimaging and drug abuse research and will allow him to accomplish these specific short-term objectives: Become an expert in (1) clinical pharmacology and (2) non-invasive brain stimulation research, and enhance/develop his (3) knowledge of the responsible conduct of research, (4) skills for scientific communication and grant writing, and (5) ability to manage an independent research program. UK has numerous faculty and projects focused on drug abuse research and is an ideal environment for Dr. Wesley to successfully complete this award. Dr. Wesley has assembled a stellar mentoring team consisting of Dr. Josh Lile (Mentor), who runs a successful NIH-funded clinical pharmacology research program at UK and Drs. Mark George (Co-Mentor) and Colleen A. Hanlon of the Brain Stimulation Laboratory at the Medical University of South Carolina, Together they will guide and oversee Dr. Wesley's training in clinical pharmacology, brain stimulation, and scientific communication and grant writing. Dr. Wesley has proposed to engage in a series of formal classes, lab exchanges, and research seminars/meetings that will assist him in accomplishing the objectives of this award.

The proposed research project is novel, innovative, and rigorous. It will combine the acute administration of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the main psychoactive ingredient in cannabis, with brain stimulation and neuroimaging to examine the role of the dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and connected brain areas in drug-impaired decision-making processes. Specifically, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) will be used to raise or lower DLPFC functionality following the administration THC in randomized, double-blind, placebo- and sham-controlled experiments.

Aim 1 will test the hypotheses that excitatory TMS (raising DLPFC functionality) will attenuate the impairing effects of THC on study outcomes.

Aim 2 will test the hypotheses that inhibitory TMS (lowering DLPFC functionality) will enhance the impairing effects of THC on study outcomes.

Results from this project will improve the investigator's understanding of the mechanisms involved in cannabis-impaired decision-making, which will inform CUD management and address a growing public health concern.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

66

Phase

  • Early Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Kentucky
      • Lexington, Kentucky, United States, 40507
        • Neurobehavioral Systems Lab of the University of Kentucky College of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 34 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Habitual cannabis use problems
  • Body Mass Index ≤30

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Past or current serious physical or mental health
  • Sesame seed oil allergy
  • Irregular health issues identified by the Study Physician
  • Standard magnetic resonance imaging and transcranial magnetic stimulation exclusion criteria (e.g., metal implants, history of epilepsy, etc.)
  • Lack of affective form of birth control (females)
  • Pregnancy (females)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Excitatory TMS
Individuals assigned to this group will receive excitatory (real and sham) TMS in combination with 0, 10, and 30mg THC.
Individuals will receive placebo dose and sham TMS.
Other Names:
  • Placebo
  • Sham TMS
Individuals will receive 10mg dose and sham TMS.
Other Names:
  • Sham TMS
  • 10mg THC
Individuals will receive 30mg dose and sham TMS.
Other Names:
  • Sham TMS
  • 30mg THC
Individuals will receive placebo and real TMS.
Other Names:
  • Placebo
  • Real TMS
Individuals will receive10mg THC and real TMS. Intervention type: Other (combination device/drug intervention)
Other Names:
  • 10mg THC
  • Real TMS
Individuals will receive 30mg THC and real TMS. Intervention type: Other (combination device/drug intervention)
Other Names:
  • 30mg THC
  • Real TMS
Experimental: Inhibitory TMS
Individuals assigned to this group will receive inhibitory (real and sham) TMS in combination with 0, 10, and 30mg THC.
Individuals will receive placebo dose and sham TMS.
Other Names:
  • Placebo
  • Sham TMS
Individuals will receive 10mg dose and sham TMS.
Other Names:
  • Sham TMS
  • 10mg THC
Individuals will receive 30mg dose and sham TMS.
Other Names:
  • Sham TMS
  • 30mg THC
Individuals will receive placebo and real TMS.
Other Names:
  • Placebo
  • Real TMS
Individuals will receive10mg THC and real TMS. Intervention type: Other (combination device/drug intervention)
Other Names:
  • 10mg THC
  • Real TMS
Individuals will receive 30mg THC and real TMS. Intervention type: Other (combination device/drug intervention)
Other Names:
  • 30mg THC
  • Real TMS

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Alpha Learning Rate
Time Frame: Measure collected at 2 time points: Baseline (0HR) and Post TMS Administration (3HR)

In a Probabilistic Reinforcement Learning Choice (PRLC) task, two stimuli are presented and choosing either could result in a monetary reinforcer, but the reinforcement probabilities of the stimuli differ, and change throughout the task. Individuals attempt to optimize choices according to learned probabilities and track changing probabilities over time.

PRLC performance allows mathematical modeling of trial-by-trial data under "real-world" uncertainty and yields computational parameters, such as the learning rate. Choice data were analyzed using a Rescorla-Wanger learning model with an alpha learning rate, beta inverse temperature, and perseveration global parameters. Model-derived learning rates are indicative of an individual's ability to learn from previous choice outcomes to update future decision-making. For this task, learning rates range from 0-1 with lower values indicative of more optimal learning.

Measure collected at 2 time points: Baseline (0HR) and Post TMS Administration (3HR)
Self-Report Subjective "High"
Time Frame: Measured 2 times: Baseline (0HR) and 3 hours (3HR) after capsule administration on each drug condition (0mg, 10mg, 30mg)
A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to measure the acute subjective effects of THC at varying doses (0mg, 10mg, 30mg). Responses are made for VAS items along a 100-unit scale anchored on the extremes by "Not At All" (0) and "Extremely" (100) with a higher score meaning more of the effect. Participants were instructed to select "Not At All" (0) for all baseline (0HR) measures. Post-TMS administration (real or sham), participant self-reported their subjective "high" on the VAS with higher values indicating a more intense sensation of "high".
Measured 2 times: Baseline (0HR) and 3 hours (3HR) after capsule administration on each drug condition (0mg, 10mg, 30mg)
Elasticity of Demand
Time Frame: Measured 2 times: Baseline (0HR) and Post-TMS (3HR) after THC administration on each drug condition (0mg, 10mg, 30mg).
Elasticity of Demand was measured by the Cannabis Purchase Task (CPT) where participants are asked how many "hits" of cannabis they would consume at 16 different price points in ascending order ($0-$140). Higher elasticity values indicate a greater sensitivity to changing price points resulting in a reduced demand for "hits" of THC at increasing price points.
Measured 2 times: Baseline (0HR) and Post-TMS (3HR) after THC administration on each drug condition (0mg, 10mg, 30mg).
Working Memory Performance
Time Frame: Measured 2 times: Baseline (0HR) and Post-TMS (3HR) after THC administration on each drug condition (0mg, 10mg, 30mg).
Working memory (WM), the ability to hold a finite amount of information for a set amount of time, is measured by the N-Back task. Here, participants were presented with a sequence of letters and must indicate when the letter currently being viewed matches the one from N steps earlier in the sequence. The load factor "N" is adjusted between 0, 1, and 2 to adjust the difficulty of the task (0-Back = no WM load, 1-Back = minimal WM load, 2-Back = greater WM load) where a higher score means better memory performance. Outcomes are reported as the Total Accuracy Percentage (Correct Choices/Total Choices) x 100%
Measured 2 times: Baseline (0HR) and Post-TMS (3HR) after THC administration on each drug condition (0mg, 10mg, 30mg).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael J Wesley, PhD, University of Kentucky

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 15, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 13, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

December 13, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 6, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 7, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

May 10, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 5, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 8, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Substance-Related Disorders

Clinical Trials on Placebo TMS Sham

3
Subscribe