Comparison of Effectiveness of Tonic, High Frequency and Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation in Chronic Pain Syndromes

May 27, 2019 updated by: Pawel Sokal, Jan Biziel University Hospital No 2 in Bydgoszcz

Comparison of Effectiveness of Tonic, High Frequency and Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation in Chronic Pain Syndromes: a Double-blind, Randomised, Cross-over, Placebo Controlled Trial

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is one of the most commonly undertaken neuromodulatory surgery techniques in the treatment of neuropathic pain. The indication for SCS is an ineffective conservative treatment of chronic pain syndromes. The effectiveness of SCS in the case of neuropathic pain is high. The positive result of SCS treatment is the reduction of previous painful symptoms by min. 50% and / or a reduction in the amount of taken analgesics and an improvement in the quality of life including sleep quality. Long-term studies estimate that in a properly selected group of patients more than 50% of patients achieve pain reduction by the required 50% and about 60% - 70% have an improvement in the quality of life and a reduction of pain.

The efficacy of SCS in different modes of stimulation is evaluated. Patients receive four different types of stimulation for 2-week period - not knowing what kind of stimulation it is. It is said that in one type of stimulation they would feel parestesias and in other three they would not. Patients are not informed that beside tonic, burst and high frequency stimulation, the fourth is an off stimulation to check for placebo effect. The test is double-blinded

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Patients with FBSS and CRPS are evaluated for VAS,, dissability scale, Quality of Life (QoL), sleep disorders and mental disorders.

All patients undergo percutaneus (1 or 2) 8-contact SCS electrode implantation with trial.

All patients are blindly randomized to tonic or burst or high frequency or off stimulation. After 2-week period each participant is adequately switched to another type of stimulation for next 2 weeks. Alltogether crossover takes 8 weeks: four 2-week periods of tonic, burst, HF and off stimulation. At the end of trial period patients are subjected to the mode of stimulation which is the most efficent. The final 2-week stimulation is performed with final renewed evaluation for VAS, amount of taken medications, dissability scale, Quality of Life (QoL), sleep disorders and mental disorders. Follow-up observation will last up to 12 months.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Bydgoszcz, Poland, 85-168
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Neurosurgery and Neurology University Hospital nr 2 Collegium Medicum Nicolaus Copernicus University
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Agnieszka Malukiewicz

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. FBSS, CRPS patients with neuropathic and mixed pain in low-back and/or legs refractory to conservative therapy
  2. Chronic pain as a result of FBSS that exists for at least 6 months
  3. ≥ 18 years of age
  4. Written consent of the patient to participate in study procedures.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Active malignancy
  2. Addiction to any of the following: drugs, alcohol and/or medication
  3. Evidence of an active disruptive psychiatric disorder or other known condition significant enough to impact perception of pain, compliance to intervention and/or ability to evaluate treatment outcome as determined by investigator
  4. Local infection or other skin disorder at site of surgical incision
  5. Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: scs high-frequency
high-frequency stimulation
SCS with Device: Precision Novi™ system
Other Names:
  • SCS
Experimental: scs tonic
tonic stimulation
SCS with Device: Precision Novi™ system
Other Names:
  • SCS
Experimental: scs burst
burst stimulation
SCS with Device: Precision Novi™ system
Other Names:
  • SCS
Placebo Comparator: scs off
off stimulation
SCS with Device: Precision Novi™ system
Other Names:
  • SCS

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analogue Scale
Time Frame: 12 months
Change from baseline in VAS for back and leg pain
12 months
Oswestry Disability Index
Time Frame: 12 months
Change from baseline in functionality using the ODI score
12 months
Adverse Events
Time Frame: 12 months
Number of AE through the study
12 months
Number of pain medication
Time Frame: 12months
List of pain medication taken by patient
12months
Quality of life scale
Time Frame: 12months
Quality of life assessed by EuroQol group - 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)
12months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Paweł Sokal, Jan Biziel University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 17, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 20, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

May 21, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 29, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 27, 2019

Last Verified

May 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on CRPS (Complex Regional Pain Syndromes)

Clinical Trials on Device: Precision Novi™ system Neurostimulation procedures

3
Subscribe