Electronic Symptom Follow-up of Cancer Patients

August 22, 2025 updated by: Jussi Koivunen, Oulu University Hospital

Follow-up of Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy or Targeted Therapy by Electronic Patient Reported Outcomes-tool

Use of ePROs in oncological care have resulted in improvement of QoL, decreased ER visits, and improvement of overall survival. Furthermore, ePRO follow-up resulted in better QoL, improved ECOG status and more active cancer treatments at disease relapse, and improved survival among cancer survivals. The current study investigates electronic patient reported outcome tool in the follow-up of cancer patients receiving chemotherapies or targeted therapies.

The aims of the current study are: 1) The number of alerts triggered by Kaiku Cancer medical treatment side-effects questionnaire and their correlation to treatment side-effects, other relevant medical events, tumor progression, and survival 2) Changes in Kaiku QLQ-C30 QoL questionnaire and their correlation to cancer treatment response, side-effects, other relevant medical event or survival 3) Patient compliance to Kaiku ePRO surveillance during treatment period according to response rates of Patient experience survey, Kaiku Cancer medical treatment side-effects questionnaire and Kaiku QLQ-C30 QoL questionnaire

In addition, in the CRC (colorectal cancer) cohort:

  1. Integration of laboratory values to patient reported symptoms when prescribing a new chemotherapy cycle
  2. Number of phone calls related to prescribing a new chemotherapy cycle
  3. Unscheduled doctor appointments in oncology unit
  4. ER visits
  5. Days in hospitalization
  6. Unscheduled investigations in health care
  7. Development of peripheral neurotoxicity
  8. The number of chemotherapy dose reductions
  9. The number of chemotherapy delays
  10. Health care user experience survey

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

43

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Oulu, Finland
        • Oulu University Hospital
      • Vaasa, Finland
        • Vaasa Central Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Written informed consent prior to any study procedure
  2. Advanced breast, lung, colorectal, or pancreatic cancer
  3. New cancer medical treatment, chemotherapy or targeted therapy initiated within -/+ 2 weeks from signed consent
  4. Age ≥18y
  5. ECOG 0-2
  6. CRC cohort: Patients with adjuvant treatment, or first or second line of treatment for metastatic disease
  7. Patient compliant with study procedures

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Initiation of new cancer medical treatment > 2 wks from signed consent
  2. Any medical condition that the Investigator considers significant to compromise the safety of the patient or that impairs the interpretation of study assessments
  3. No internet access/email

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Electronic follow-up
Electronic patient reported outcomes

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Patient reported symptom severity
Time Frame: At Baseline, and at 2-3, 4-5, 6-7, 8-9, and 11-12weeks
Percentages of patient reported symptoms and their severity according NCI-CTCAE by KaikuHealth algorithm
At Baseline, and at 2-3, 4-5, 6-7, 8-9, and 11-12weeks
Change in the number of triggered alerts by the tool
Time Frame: At Baseline, and at 2-3, 4-5, 6-7, 8-9, and 11-12weeks
Number of triggered alerts by the tool and their correlation to treatment side-effects, cancer progression, other medical events in percentages or survival.
At Baseline, and at 2-3, 4-5, 6-7, 8-9, and 11-12weeks
Changes in Quality of Life according to QLQ-C30 Summary scores
Time Frame: At baseline, and at 4, 8, and 12weeks

The correlation of the Summary score of QLQ-C30 to treatment side-effects, cancer progression, or other medical events or survival.

The Core Quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-C30) is a validated cancer health-related quality-of-life questionnaire that includes five function domains (physical, emotional, social, role, cognitive), eight symptoms (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting, constipation, diarrhea, insomnia, dyspnea, and appetite loss), as well as global health/quality of life and financial impact. Subjects respond on a four-point-scale from "not at all" to "very much" for most items. Raw scores are linearly converted to a 0-100 scale. For the functioning scales and global QoL higher scores indicate better functioning; for the symptom scales higher scores indicate higher symptom burden. The summary score of QLQ-C30 is calculated from the mean of 13 of 15 QLQ-C30 scales (the Global Quality of Life scale and the Financial Impact scale are not included).

At baseline, and at 4, 8, and 12weeks
Changes in Patient compliance Questionnaire
Time Frame: At 4, 8, and 12weeks
Patient compliance using KaikuHealth e-questionnaire addressing usability (easiness to use from scale: very easy to very difficult; need of assistance to use the program: yes/no; how understandable are questions in symptom questionnaire from scale: totally agree to totally disagree) and user experience (use of the ePRO tool will better your cancer care: yes-no, do not know; use of the ePRO tool has been useful: yes-no-do not know; would you recommend the ePRO tool for cancer care: yes-no-do not know). Analysis is done on percentages of each answer choice at specific time point(s).
At 4, 8, and 12weeks
Changes in patient compliance according to answering rate to symptom questionnaires
Time Frame: At 4, 8, and 12weeks
Patient compliance using response rates (within one week) to symptom questionnaires in percentages from sent requests
At 4, 8, and 12weeks
Change in patient compliance according to answering rates to QLQ-C30 questionnaire
Time Frame: At 4, 8, and 12weeks
Patient compliance using response rates to QLQ-C30 questionnaires (within one week) in percentages from sent requests. The QLQ-C30 questionnaire includes five function domains (physical, emotional, social, role, cognitive), eight symptoms (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting, constipation, diarrhea, insomnia, dyspnea, and appetite loss), as well as global health/quality of life and financial impact. Subjects respond on a four-point-scale from "not at all" to "very much" for most items. Raw scores are linearly converted to a 0-100 scale. For the functioning scales and global QoL higher scores indicate better functioning; for the symptom scales higher scores indicate higher symptom burden. The summary score of QLQ-C30 is calculated from the mean of 13 of 15 QLQ-C30 scales (the Global Quality of Life scale and the Financial Impact scale are not included).
At 4, 8, and 12weeks
Change in the spectrum of patient reported symptoms
Time Frame: At Baseline, and at 2-3, 4-5, 6-7, 8-9, and 11-12weeks
Percentages of patient reported symptoms using KaikuHealth 15 symptom e-questionnaire. Individual questions evaluate the presence of a specific symptom e.g. nausea. Questions are answered yes or no.
At Baseline, and at 2-3, 4-5, 6-7, 8-9, and 11-12weeks
Correlation between changes in different symptoms and their severity to treatment side-effects, cancer progression, other medical events, or survival
Time Frame: At 2-3, 4-5, 6-7, 8-9, and 11-12weeks
Correlation between different patient reported symptoms and their severity to treatment side-effects, cancer progression or other medical events in percentages or survival
At 2-3, 4-5, 6-7, 8-9, and 11-12weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Integration of laboratory values to patient reported symptoms when prescribing a new chemotherapy cycle in the CRC cohort
Time Frame: At 2-3 weeks cycle upon chemotherapy dosing schema during the treatment phase of the trial
An integrated electronic follow-up tool combining patient reported outcomes and the results of the safety laboratory values taken before treatment
At 2-3 weeks cycle upon chemotherapy dosing schema during the treatment phase of the trial
Number of phone calls related to prescribing a new chemotherapy cycle in the CRC cohort
Time Frame: At 2-3 weeks cycle upon chemotherapy dosing schema during the treatment phase of the trial
Number of un-scheduled phone calls to patients from health care professionals before a new chemotherapy cycle
At 2-3 weeks cycle upon chemotherapy dosing schema during the treatment phase of the trial
Unscheduled doctor appointments in oncology unit in the CRC cohort
Time Frame: During the treatment phase of the trial or up tp 24 weeks
The number of unscheduled doctor appointments in oncology unit due to patient-related issues
During the treatment phase of the trial or up tp 24 weeks
Emergency Clinic visits in the CRC cohort
Time Frame: During the treatment phase of the trial or up to 24 weeks
The number of Emergency Clinic visits
During the treatment phase of the trial or up to 24 weeks
Days in hospitalization in the CRC cohort
Time Frame: During the treatment phase of the trial or up to 24 weeks
The number of days in hospitalization
During the treatment phase of the trial or up to 24 weeks
Unscheduled investigations in health care in the CRC cohort
Time Frame: During the treatment phase of the trial or up to 24 weeks
The number of unscheduled investigations in health care
During the treatment phase of the trial or up to 24 weeks
Development of peripheral neurotoxicity in the CRC cohort
Time Frame: At Baseline, and at 2-3, 4-5, 6-7, 8-9, and 11-12 weeks
The severity of peripheral neurotoxicity according to NCI-CTCAE By KaikuHealth algorithm
At Baseline, and at 2-3, 4-5, 6-7, 8-9, and 11-12 weeks
The number of chemotherapy dose reductions
Time Frame: During the treatment phase of the trial or up to 24 weeks
The number of chemotherapy dose reductions due to patient-related issues
During the treatment phase of the trial or up to 24 weeks
The number of chemotherapy delays
Time Frame: During the treatment phase of the trial or up to 24 weeks
The number of chemotherapy delays due to patient-related issues
During the treatment phase of the trial or up to 24 weeks
Health care user experience survey
Time Frame: Monthly during the treatment phase of the trial or up to 24 weeks
A questionnaire assessing the feasibility of electronic follow-up from health care professionals point of view
Monthly during the treatment phase of the trial or up to 24 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 31, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

May 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 4, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 4, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

September 9, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

August 29, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 22, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • OuluUH2

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer

Clinical Trials on Electronic patient reported outcomes tool

Subscribe