- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03079375
The Pharmacist Follows You and Your Medication From Hospital to Your Daily Life and Investigate What This Means to You
The Impact of Pharmaceutical Medication Review, Medication Interview Before Discharge and Follow-up: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Background
It is well known that the transfer of a patient from hospital to the general practitioner is related with mistakes in the medication of the patient. A report from 2006 measure the number of drug related admissions in Denmark to be 69.000 to 162.000 per year. To reduce these mistakes, more and better communication between the health professionals are suggested. Furthermore medication reviews made by pharmacist seems to reduce the number of drug related readmissions and other drug related issues, which can lead to an economic cost reduction.
Objective
The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of medication review and better communication between the health professionals after discharge of a patient from hospital to the general practitioner. The effect is measured as reducing the number of readmissions and number of visits at the emergency department 30 days and six month after inclusion of the patient.
Method
This study was estimated to include 1500 participants. The patients were randomized to one of three groups; usual care, basic intervention or extended intervention. The usual care received the normal care following the Danish standard procedure. The basic intervention had a medication review by a clinical pharmacist during admission.
The extended interventions group was similar to the basic intervention group plus follow-up with the patient, the general practitioner and if relevant the nursing home and pharmacy one week and six month after discharge by interview with the clinical pharmacist.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The aim of this study is to determine if a multifaceted pharmacist intervention based on medication review, medication interview and follow up with patient, general practitioner and pharmacy can reduce the number of readmissions and death and or if the time to next admission can be postponed. The combination of the full pharmacist intervention is compared with medication review alone in comparison to non-intervention.
Pharmacist intervention:
Usual care group: the patients received no intervention by the clinical pharmacist.
Basic intervention group: A structured, patient centered medication review (MR) was conducted by the clinical pharmacist. The following was considered during MR: Were there untreated diagnoses, has the goal of treatment been reached, was the treatment compliant with current national guidelines regarding dose, choice of drug and time of treatment. Focus was at certain drugs most commonly implicated in causing admission. Furthermore, all drugs on the medication list were assessed according to the following: Indication for treatment, drug dose, considering i.e. kidney insufficiency, age, etc., adverse drug events, therapeutic duplication, dosage time and interval, drug formulation and strength, interactions, contraindications, precautions and specific patient characteristics.
Advice on drug selection, dosages, monitoring needs and possibly side effects were given to the physician in charge of the patient, and written in the electronic patient journal (EPJ).
Extended intervention group: MR was conducted according to the same terms and conditions as for the basic intervention group. Upon discharge medication reconciliation was conducted. The pharmacist provided a motivational interview (MI)-based patient interview including a comprehensive summary of changes in the drug therapy during the hospitalization.
Post discharge any drug related problem not dealt with during hospitalization was mailed or faxed to the general practitioner (GP). When needed, the GP, care giver and primary care pharmacy were contacted by phone (approximately five working days after discharge).
Follow-up interview by phone was performed twice. The first was conducted one week post discharge and the second six months after discharge. When needed additional follow-ups could be made. The follow-up interviews had an motivational interview approach.
All interventions were conducted according to a defined standard operating procedure and all interventions were performed by qualified clinical pharmacists from the involved sites. In order to minimize the risk of cultural differences and variations in routine's the regions in between, all data pharmacists were trained prior to entering the study.
Data was analysed after the intention-to-treat method. Data was analyzed after a proportional hazard cox regression with the randomization group as the only variable.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Usual medicine of five drugs or above
- Speak and understand Danish
- Admitted via the Acute Medicine Admission Ward
- Are able to give informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients included in a similar study
- Declared terminal
- Suicidal
- In custody
- Isolated at the hospital
- Im- and/or expressive aphasia
- Severe dementia
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
No Intervention: usual care
no pharmaceutical intervention.
|
|
Sham Comparator: basic intervention
Medication review
|
medication review
|
Sham Comparator: extended intervention
medication review, medication interview before discharge and follow-up with patient, GP and if relevant pharmacy and nursing home.
|
medication review, medication interview before discharge and follow-up
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Readmissions
Time Frame: 30 days
|
number of patients who have been readmitted
|
30 days
|
Admissions
Time Frame: 180 days
|
number of patients who have been admitted
|
180 days
|
Emergency Department Visits
Time Frame: 180 days
|
number of patients who have emergency department visits
|
180 days
|
Composite Endpoint, Admissions or Emergency Department Visits
Time Frame: 180 days
|
number of patients who experience primary composite endpoint, admissions or emergency department visits within 6 month
|
180 days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Drug-related Admissions
Time Frame: 180 days after the inclusion date
|
number of patients who have drug related admissions
|
180 days after the inclusion date
|
Drug-related Readmissions
Time Frame: 30 days after the inclusion date
|
number of patients who have drug related readmissions
|
30 days after the inclusion date
|
Percentage of Medication Changes Accepted by GPs
Time Frame: up to 180 days
|
Acceptance rate in primary care (general practitioner).
Medication review data were not collected from the Usual care Group and were collected only for the Basic and Extended Groups.
|
up to 180 days
|
Medication Review Changes Accepted by Physicians (in Hospital)
Time Frame: 1 month
|
Medication review data were not collected from the Usual care Group and were collected only for the Basic and Extended Groups.
|
1 month
|
Mortality
Time Frame: 180 days after the inclusion date
|
number of patient who died within 6 month after inclusion
|
180 days after the inclusion date
|
Drug Related Mortality
Time Frame: 180 days after the inclusion date
|
number of patients who have drug related death
|
180 days after the inclusion date
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Study Director: Lene V. Ravn-Nielsen, M.Sc.Pharm, Hospital Pharmacy of Funen
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- Cross-sectorial medicine
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cross-Sectional Study
-
Yune ZhaoCompletedProspective Cross-sectional StudyChina
-
Beijing Jishuitan HospitalUnknownDegenerative Disc Disease | Cross-sectional Study | Degenerative Disease JointChina
-
Odense University HospitalCompletedOlder Patients | Medication Review | Cross-sectional CommunicationDenmark
-
Guven Health GroupCompletedAthletic Performance | Physical Fitness | Handball Players | Cross-sectional StudiesTurkey
-
Peking University Third HospitalUnknownCovid19 | Cohort Study | Respiratory Rehabilitation | Cross-sectional StudyChina
-
Ningbo No. 1 HospitalCompletedAtrial Fibrillation | Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease | Cross-sectional StudyChina
-
The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese...Not yet recruitingCOVID-19 Pandemic | Cross-sectional Study
-
Peking University First HospitalUnknownStaphylococcal Infections | Acute Kidney Injury | Adverse Effect | Cross-sectional Study | VancomycinChina
-
King Saud UniversityRecruitingCross Sectional Hospital Based StudySaudi Arabia
-
Albert TRINH-DUCCompleted
Clinical Trials on basic intervention
-
Temple UniversityCompleted
-
Gunilla FahlstromÖrebro County Council; Örebro University, SwedenCompleted
-
United Arab Emirates UniversityUniversity of SharjahCompletedOverweight and ObesityUnited Arab Emirates
-
University of Massachusetts, WorcesterCompleted
-
Logan College of ChiropracticUnknown
-
The University of Hong KongResearch Grants Council, Hong KongRecruitingFear of Cancer Progression | Metacognition-based Intervention | Supportive-expressive Based Intervention | Psychooncology | Advanced or Metastatic CancerHong Kong
-
Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhan No.1 HospitalRecruitingStress, Psychological | Autonomic Nervous System Diseases | Emotional StressChina
-
The University of Hong KongResearch Grants Council, Hong KongActive, not recruitingFear of Cancer RecurrenceHong Kong
-
Indonesia UniversityCompletedMilitary ActivityIndonesia
-
Horsholm MunicipalityRecruitingSarcopenia | Hip Fractures | Fall InjuryDenmark