Coordinating Opioid Use Treatment Through Medical Management With Infection Treatment (Project COMMIT) (COMMIT)

April 11, 2024 updated by: Yale University
This study seeks to test a new model of care (ID/LAB) in which opioid use disorder (OUD) is managed by infectious disease (ID) specialists and hospitalists concurrent with management of the OUD-related infections, using long-acting injectable buprenorphine (LAB), followed by referral as soon as possible after hospital discharge to community resources for long term treatment of OUD.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

There are three specific aims that this study will use to assess a new model of care aimed at treating opioid use disorder (OUD). These aims address whether treatment is maintained by patients, if patients' opioid use outcomes improve and to determine if adherence to treatment for infectious disease results in fewer re-hospitalizations and emergency room visits, as well as improved quality of life.

The specific aims:

Aim1: The primary outcome will be a binary indicator of whether a patient is enrolled in and receiving effective medication treatment for OUD (buprenorphine, methadone, or injection naltrexone) at 12 weeks (3 months) after randomization.

Aim 2: Evidence of improved opioid use outcomes (lower days of using opioids, negative urine opioids).

Aim 3: Have higher rates of completion of the antimicrobial regimen for their infectious disease, decreased re-hospitalizations and emergency room presentations related to either their infectious disease or OUD over the 12-week follow-up period, and improved measures of quality of life.

The intent of this study is to test the hypothesis:

Assignment to the ID/LAB arm (OUD managed directly by the infectious disease (ID) specialists or hospitalist team with long acting injection buprenorphine (LAB)) will promote greater enrollment in effective medication treatment for OUD at 12 weeks after randomization, compared to TAU.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

200

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Connecticut
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06520
        • Recruiting
        • Yale New Haven Hospital
    • Pennsylvania
      • Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States, 17033
        • Recruiting
        • Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
    • South Carolina
      • Greenville, South Carolina, United States, 29650
        • Recruiting
        • Prisma Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults able to provide written informed consent in English or Spanish;
  • Current hospitalization with a suspected or known bacterial or viral (HIV/HCV/HBV) infection including but not limited to bacteremia, Candidal fungemia, osteomyelitis, endophthalmitis, septic thrombophlebitis, infected pseudoaneurysm, endocarditis, skin/soft tissue infection (SSTI), or septic arthritis;
  • Current moderate-to-severe OUD (DSM-5);
  • Willing to accept assignment to either ID/LAB or TAU, and to participate in research follow-up visits.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe medical or psychiatric disability making participation unsafe (e.g. imminent suicide risk);
  • Pregnancy, planning conception, or breast-feeding for female participants;
  • Allergy, hypersensitivity or medical contraindication to buprenorphine;
  • Moderate-severe liver impairment in the judgment of the study investigator;
  • Preexisting enrollment on methadone or buprenorphine (SL-B) maintenance AND intending to remain on methadone or buprenorphine maintenance upon discharge (patients already under effective treatment for OUD do not represent the target population of untreated OUD patients entering hospitals, nor would we want to disrupt established effective treatment).
  • Inability or unwillingness of subject to give informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: TAU
Treatment as Usual (TAU).
TAU is designed to systematize what is the current practice at the participating hospitals and in most U.S. hospitals while offering a minimum standard of care. TAU will constitute recommendation for MOUD initiation and consultation for addiction medicine when available; in practice, it is typically detoxification from opioids and referral to community-based addiction treatment after hospital discharge.
Experimental: ID/LAB
Infectious Disease management of OUD with Long-Acting injectable buprenorphine (ID/LAB).
ID/LAB is the new model in which OUD is managed by Infectious Disease (ID) specialists and/or Hospitalists concurrent with management of the infectious diseases, using long-acting injectable buprenorphine (LAB).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Retention in Medication Treatment for OUD
Time Frame: 12 weeks

Enrollment in effective medication treatment for OUD (either buprenorphine maintenance, methadone maintenance, or extended-release naltrexone) will be ascertained through interview of the participant at each assessment point, using a modified, brief version of the Treatment Services Review that records type and dose of medication treatment, contact information on the treatment program, and psychosocial treatment modalities accessed since the previous visit (e.g. professional counseling, 12-step group participation).

The primary outcome will be a binary indicator of whether or not the patient is enrolled on buprenorphine maintenance treatment or other effective medication (methadone maintenance or extended-release naltrexone) at 12 weeks after randomization, verified by either report from the treatment program, or if the treatment program does not respond, prescription drug monitoring report or EMR.

12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total days of using opioids
Time Frame: 4 weeks
This outcome will be measured by Timeline Followback, which assesses self-reported alcohol and other drug use including opioid use route of use and form of drug, for the 30 days before baseline, and for each day over the follow up period, using calendars and memory aids to enhance recall.
4 weeks
Total days of using opioids
Time Frame: 8 weeks
This outcome will be measured by Timeline Followback, which assesses self-reported alcohol and other drug use including opioid use route of use and form of drug, for the 30 days before baseline, and for each day over the follow up period, using calendars and memory aids to enhance recall.
8 weeks
Total days of using opioids
Time Frame: 12 weeks
This outcome will be measured by Timeline Followback, which assesses self-reported alcohol and other drug use including opioid use route of use and form of drug, for the 30 days before baseline, and for each day over the follow up period, using calendars and memory aids to enhance recall.
12 weeks
Total days of using opioids
Time Frame: 24 weeks
This outcome will be measured by Timeline Followback, which assesses self-reported alcohol and other drug use including opioid use route of use and form of drug, for the 30 days before baseline, and for each day over the follow up period, using calendars and memory aids to enhance recall.
24 weeks
Negative urine screens: Opioids
Time Frame: 4 weeks
This outcome will be measured by urine toxicology-confirmed abstinence via urine toxicology (Manufacturer: Redwood Toxicology) for recent illicit opioid use.
4 weeks
Negative urine screens: Opioids
Time Frame: 8 weeks
This outcome will be measured by urine toxicology-confirmed abstinence via urine toxicology (Manufacturer: Redwood Toxicology) for recent illicit opioid use.
8 weeks
Negative urine screens: Opioids
Time Frame: 12 weeks
This outcome will be measured by urine toxicology-confirmed abstinence via urine toxicology (Manufacturer: Redwood Toxicology) for recent illicit opioid use.
12 weeks
Negative urine screens: Opioids
Time Frame: 24 weeks
This outcome will be measured by urine toxicology-confirmed abstinence via urine toxicology (Manufacturer: Redwood Toxicology) for recent illicit opioid use.
24 weeks
Treatment completion rate
Time Frame: 4 weeks
This outcome is assessed by the Medical/Infectious Disease/TAU questionnaire. This form documents the completion of antimicrobial therapy and re-hospitalization for infection. The initial evaluation documents the relevant infection and medical details such as infection site, organism, and stage. It also extracts the type of ant-infective, route of administration, dose, and planned duration. Information on follow-up is collected alteration of treatment plan, infection related adverse events (e.g. PICC complications, drug reaction/toxicity to anti-infective agent prescribed by non-study clinicians, etc), and intervening hospitalizations. Completion success is defined as appropriate completion of antimicrobial therapy, as documented in the initial assessment, without interruption or unexpected prolongation of therapy.
4 weeks
Treatment completion rate
Time Frame: 8 weeks
This outcome is assessed by the Medical/Infectious Disease/TAU questionnaire. This form documents the completion of antimicrobial therapy and re-hospitalization for infection. The initial evaluation documents the relevant infection and medical details such as infection site, organism, and stage. It also extracts the type of ant-infective, route of administration, dose, and planned duration. Information on follow-up is collected alteration of treatment plan, infection related adverse events (e.g. PICC complications, drug reaction/toxicity to anti-infective agent prescribed by non-study clinicians, etc), and intervening hospitalizations. Completion success is defined as appropriate completion of antimicrobial therapy, as documented in the initial assessment, without interruption or unexpected prolongation of therapy.
8 weeks
Treatment completion rate
Time Frame: 12 weeks
This outcome is assessed by the Medical/Infectious Disease/TAU questionnaire. This form documents the completion of antimicrobial therapy and re-hospitalization for infection. The initial evaluation documents the relevant infection and medical details such as infection site, organism, and stage. It also extracts the type of ant-infective, route of administration, dose, and planned duration. Information on follow-up is collected alteration of treatment plan, infection related adverse events (e.g. PICC complications, drug reaction/toxicity to anti-infective agent prescribed by non-study clinicians, etc), and intervening hospitalizations. Completion success is defined as appropriate completion of antimicrobial therapy, as documented in the initial assessment, without interruption or unexpected prolongation of therapy.
12 weeks
Treatment completion rate
Time Frame: 24 weeks
This outcome is assessed by the Medical/Infectious Disease/TAU questionnaire. This form documents the completion of antimicrobial therapy and re-hospitalization for infection. The initial evaluation documents the relevant infection and medical details such as infection site, organism, and stage. It also extracts the type of ant-infective, route of administration, dose, and planned duration. Information on follow-up is collected alteration of treatment plan, infection related adverse events (e.g. PICC complications, drug reaction/toxicity to anti-infective agent prescribed by non-study clinicians, etc), and intervening hospitalizations. Completion success is defined as appropriate completion of antimicrobial therapy, as documented in the initial assessment, without interruption or unexpected prolongation of therapy.
24 weeks
Re-hospitalization/Emergency room visits
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Re-hospitalizations and emergency room presentations related to either their infectious disease or OUD will be totaled over the intervention duration and 12-week follow-up period.
12 weeks
Re-hospitalization/Emergency room visits
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Re-hospitalizations and emergency room presentations related to either their infectious disease or OUD will be totaled over the intervention duration and 12-week follow-up period.
24 weeks
Quality of life measure of social and occupational functioning
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Quality of life is measured using the WHOQOL-Bref, which is a is a well validated and widely used scale for persons with substance use disorders that measures the quality of social and occupational functioning as well as other domains. Scores are scaled in a positive direction (higher scores indicate a higher quality of life). A total of 500 is the highest score attainable and indicates highest quality of life in respondents.
12 weeks
Quality of life measure of social and occupational functioning
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Quality of life is measured using the WHOQOL-Bref, which is a is a well validated and widely used scale for persons with substance use disorders that measures the quality of social and occupational functioning as well as other domains. Scores are scaled in a positive direction (higher scores indicate a higher quality of life). A total of 500 is the highest score attainable and indicates highest quality of life in respondents.
24 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sandra Springer, MD, Yale School of Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 18, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 25, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 25, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

November 27, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 12, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 11, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2000026223
  • U01TR002763 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Opioid-use Disorder

Clinical Trials on TAU

3
Subscribe