The Relationship Between Post-ERCP-choledocholithiasis and Gallbladder Status

November 18, 2021 updated by: Wenbo Meng, Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Institute of Gansu Province

Does the Gallbladder Status Influence the Occurence of Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Choledochopancreatography(ERCP) -Choledocholithiasis

In this retrospective study, the investigators evaluate the relationship of post-ERCP-choledocholithiasis(PEC ) and the gallbladder status as a risk factor.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

When patients have common bile duct(CBD) stones, ERCP is widely used for stone extraction instead of clinical operation. ERCP has many advantages like less injury or faster recovery. However, according to literature, ERCP will has a mostly 10% possibility to get an acute purulent cholecystitis, which often requires emergency intervention, therefore, it is necessary to know if the gallbladder status(chronic disease) is one of the important risk factors of PEC like the gallbladder wall thickness, chronic cholecystitis, polyps,crudely or calculus.

.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

1117

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Gansu
      • Lanzhou, Gansu, China, 730000
        • Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Institute of Gansu Province

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Routine ERCP patients with CBD stones

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Routine ERCP for CBD stone patients with gallbladder in situ

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unwillingness or inability to consent for the study
  • Unstable vital signs Coagulation dysfunction (INR>1.5) and low peripheral blood platelet count (<50×10 ^9 / L) or using anti-coagulation drugs
  • Any Prior surgery for CBD including ERCP
  • Preoperative coexistent diseases: acute pancreatitis, GI tract hemorrhage, severe liver disease (such as decompensated liver cirrhosis, liver failure and so on), septic shock
  • Biliary- duodenal fistula confirmed during ERCP
  • Pregnant women or breastfeeding

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Acute PEC(post-ERCP-cholecystitis )
Time Frame: 1 month
When the PEC occurs, the temperature should be more than 38 celsius degree, right upper abdominal pain, the total amount of the White Blood Cell (WBC) is above normal for the patients who with the gallbladder wall thickness under ultrasound examination.
1 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants with Pancreatitis
Time Frame: 1 month
Typical abdominal pain, with the level of serum amylase increasing at least 3 times of the normal range within 24 hours after ERCP.
1 month
Number of Participants with Cholangitis
Time Frame: 1 month
Temperature should be more than 38 celsius degree, chills, with right upper abdominal pain, blood routine showing the total amount of the White Blood Cell (WBC), and the amount of polymorphonuclear neutrophil(PMN) are above normal
1 month
Number of Participants with Perforation
Time Frame: 1 month
Typical abdominal pain,abdominal muscle tension, and there are also radiographic evidence suggesting
1 month
Number of Participants with bile duct stents
Time Frame: 1 month
If it is necessary to get the patients drainage, Number of Participants with stents or endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) should be recorded
1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 31, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 18, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

November 18, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 13, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 17, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

January 21, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 19, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 18, 2021

Last Verified

November 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cholecystitis

Clinical Trials on ERCP

3
Subscribe