Assessment of the Benefit of an Inclusive Health Organization on the Prognosis of Severe Trauma Patients (TRAUMINXCLUSIF)

Appropriate management reduces the mortality of severe trauma victims. This is based on a pre-hospital medical assessment of severity, the initiation of life-saving treatments at the pre-hospital level, and referral to a hospital with human and material resources adapted to the patient's severity. The objective of this research project is to show that the 28-day mortality after severe trauma is lower in a structured health system, compared to a non-structured system.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Appropriate management reduces the mortality of severe trauma victims defined by an Injury Severity Score (ISS) greater than 15 or the need for specialized and/or urgent treatment. This is based on a pre-hospital medical assessment of severity, the initiation of life-saving treatments at the pre-hospital level, and referral to a hospital with human and material resources adapted to the patient's severity.

The trauma hospital organisation in France is of the "exclusive" type. It contrasts trauma centres with other hospitals, only providing care for severe trauma victims in the former, which are most often confused with university hospitals. The choice of referral to this type of centre is made using a triage algorithm known as "de Vittel". In addition to an insufficient network within a region leading to longer hospital access time, this organisation leads to saturation of the referral centres by patients with few lesions. For this reason, this organisation has been rethought in an innovative way within the Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes region, in favour of an "inclusive" system that takes the form of a network of hospitals with capacities to receive severely traumatised patients that vary according to their equipment and personnel. Patients are referred within this network according to their severity category (unstable, stabilized or stable).

The main objective is to show that the 28-day mortality of severely traumatized persons oriented according to their severity in an inclusive system is lower, at identical severity, than in a conventional exclusive system in which the orientation is guided by the Vittel algorithm.

Secondary objectives are to show that the management of severe traumatized persons oriented according to their severity in an inclusive system, compared to the management in an exclusive conventional system in which the orientation is guided by the Vittel/ASCOTT algorithm, is associated, at identical severity, with :

  • Less under-triage;
  • Less over-triage;
  • A lower incidence of secondary transfers to a trauma center;
  • A greater number of days living without mechanical ventilation (during the first 28 days);
  • More days living without resuscitation (within the first 28 days);
  • More frequent and rapid use of whole-body CT scans with contrast injection;
  • More frequent and rapid use of specialized emergency therapies (laparotomy or hemostasis thoracotomy, embolization, craniectomy, intracranial pressure measurement, chest drainage).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

2500

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Paris, France
        • Recruiting
        • Hôpital Pitié-Salpétrière
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- Patients cared for in the aftermath of a severe trauma, by a pre-hospital medical team regulated by the territorially competent SAMU, who arrived at the hospital alive.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age < 18 years
  • Patients with no signs of life on hospital arrival and reported deceased within 30 minutes of admission
  • Patients with severe burns (>10% skin area burned)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: hierarchized
Structured regional health organization, composed of trauma centers hierarchized in several levels according to their capacity to receive severe traumatized persons.
Experimental : Trauma patient orientation in a structured regional health organization, composed of trauma centers hierarchized in several levels according to their capacity to receive severe traumatized persons.
No Intervention: all-or-nothing
Structured regional health organization, composed of non-hierarchical trauma centers at different levels according to their capacity to receive severe trauma victims (all-or-nothing type).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
28-day mortality
Time Frame: 28th day
The primary endpoint will be 28-day mortality, defined as the occurrence of death from any cause within the first 28 days following trauma.
28th day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Undertriage
Time Frame: 28th day

Undertriage, defined as the management outside the trauma care system adapted to their condition of patients whose ISS is strictly greater than 15, or presenting at least one of the following criteria:

  • the need for transfusion of more than 4 red blood cell concentrates during the first 6 hours of management;
  • the presence of severe head trauma with CT scan lesions;
  • the presence of a spinal cord injury;
  • the need for specialized emergency surgery (laparotomy or hemostasis thoracotomy, embolization, craniectomy, intracranial pressure measurement, chest drainage) within the first 24 hours;
  • the need for a secondary inter-hospital transfer to a trauma center. This variable will be assessed at the end of the 28th day, based on the data contained in the medical file and the administrative file.
28th day
Over-triage
Time Frame: 28th day

Over-triage, defined by the management of severely traumatized patients in the trauma centre and whose ISS is less than or equal to 15 and who do not present any of the following criteria :

  • the need for transfusion of more than 4 red blood cell concentrates during the first 6 hours of management;
  • the presence of severe head trauma with CT scan lesions;
  • the presence of a spinal cord injury;
  • the need for specialized emergency surgery (laparotomy or hemostasis thoracotomy, embolization, craniectomy, intracranial pressure measurement, chest drainage) within the first 24 hours;
  • the need for transfer to a trauma center. This variable will be evaluated at the end of the 28th day, based on the data contained in the medical file and in the administrative file
28th day
Transfer to a trauma centre
Time Frame: 1 day
Tranfer to a trauma centre at the end of the pre-hospital phase. This criterion will be evaluated at the time of admission of the patient out of the SMUR ambulance. Trauma centres are considered to be hospitals with a unit dedicated to the care of these patients, identified as such by the territorially competent regional health agency;
1 day
Secondary inter-hospital transfer
Time Frame: 28th day
The need for secondary inter-hospital transfer to a specialized trauma centre or a higher-level trauma centre. This variable is defined as the transfer of the patient, during the study period, from a hospital that does not have a trauma centre to the trauma centre of a hospital that does, or the transfer of the patient from a hospital trauma centre to a higher level trauma centre (III to II, II to I, III to I). This variable will be evaluated at the end of day 28, based on the data contained in the medical file and the administrative file. Transfers for specialized but non-urgent care (e.g. hand microsurgery that can be carried out beyond the first 24 hours) will not be counted as secondary inter-hospital transfers;
28th day
Days living without mechanical ventilation
Time Frame: 28th day
The number of days living without mechanical ventilation during the first 28 days. This criterion will be assessed at the end of the 28th day, by subtracting from 28 the number of days the patient received ventilatory support by mechanical ventilation. The change of day is made at midnight. By definition, deceased patients are assigned 0 days without mechanical ventilation;
28th day
Days living without resuscitation
Time Frame: 28th day
The number of days living without resuscitation during the first 28 days. This criterion will be assessed at the end of the 28th day, by subtracting from 28 the number of days the patient will have been in resuscitation. The change of day is made at midnight. By definition, deceased patients are assigned 0 days out of resuscitation;
28th day
Length of stay in resuscitation
Time Frame: 28th day
This variable will be evaluated at the end of the 28th day, based on the data contained in the medical record and in the administrative file;
28th day
Modalities of the post-traumatic injury assessment by chest X-ray
Time Frame: first 24 hours of hospitalization
This criterion will be assessed at the end of the first 24 hours of hospitalization. It will be assessed by first performing a chest X-ray
first 24 hours of hospitalization
Modalities of the post-traumatic injury assessment by pelvis X-ray
Time Frame: first 24 hours of hospitalization
This criterion will be assessed at the end of the first 24 hours of hospitalization. It will be assessed by first performing a pelvis X-ray
first 24 hours of hospitalization
Modalities of the post-traumatic injury assessment by abdominal ultrasound
Time Frame: first 24 hours of hospitalization
This criterion will be assessed at the end of the first 24 hours of hospitalization. It will be assessed by first performing an abdominal ultrasound
first 24 hours of hospitalization
Modalities of the post-traumatic injury assessment by transcranial Doppler scan
Time Frame: first 24 hours of hospitalization
This criterion will be assessed at the end of the first 24 hours of hospitalization. It will be assessed by first performing a transcranial Doppler scan
first 24 hours of hospitalization
Modalities of the post-traumatic injury assessment by CT scan
Time Frame: first 24 hours of hospitalization
This criterion will be assessed at the end of the first 24 hours of hospitalization. This evaluation will include a whole body CT scan with contrast media injection
first 24 hours of hospitalization
Modalities of the post-traumatic injury assessment by bone radiographs
Time Frame: first 24 hours of hospitalization
This criterion will be assessed at the end of the first 24 hours of hospitalization. This evaluation will include guided bone radiographs;
first 24 hours of hospitalization
Need for and timing of laparotomy
Time Frame: 28th day
The need for and timing of laparotomy within the first 24 hours. This variable will be evaluated at the end of the 28th day, based on the data contained in the medical file and in the administrative file;
28th day
Need for and timing of hemostasis thoracotomy
Time Frame: 28th day
The need for and timing of hemostasis thoracotomy within the first 24 hours. This variable will be evaluated at the end of the 28th day, based on the data contained in the medical file and in the administrative file;
28th day
Need for and timing of embolization
Time Frame: 28th day
The need for and timing of embolization within the first 24 hours. This variable will be evaluated at the end of the 28th day, based on the data contained in the medical file and in the administrative file;
28th day
Need for and timing of craniectomy
Time Frame: 28th day
The need for and timing of craniectomy within the first 24 hours. This variable will be evaluated at the end of the 28th day, based on the data contained in the medical file and in the administrative file;
28th day
Need for and timing of intracranial pressure measurement
Time Frame: 28th day
The need for and timing of intracranial pressure measurement within the first 24 hours. This variable will be evaluated at the end of the 28th day, based on the data contained in the medical file and in the administrative file;
28th day
Need for and timing of chest drainage
Time Frame: 28th day
The need for and timing of chest drainage within the first 24 hours. This variable will be evaluated at the end of the 28th day, based on the data contained in the medical file and in the administrative file;
28th day
Distance to the nearest available pre-hospital medical facility
Time Frame: 1 day
The distance to the nearest available pre-hospital medical facility. This variable is defined as the distance between the accident and the nearest available pre-hospital medical facility (light vehicles, mobile hospital units, helicopters) available at the time of the alert in the department concerned.
1 day
Length of mechanical ventilation
Time Frame: 28th day
This variable will be evaluated at the end of the 28th day, based on the data contained in the medical record and in the administrative file;
28th day
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: 28th day
This variable will be evaluated at the end of the 28th day, based on the data contained in the medical record and in the administrative file;
28th day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: RAUX Mathieu, MD PhD, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 23, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 31, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

February 19, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 30, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 26, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • APHP180625

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Wounds and Injuries

Clinical Trials on Triage

3
Subscribe