What is the Workload Burden Associated With Using the Triage HF+ Care Pathway? (TRIAGE-HF)

Prospective Triage HF+ Evaluation: What is the Workload Burden Associated With Using the Triage HF+ Care Pathway?

This observational, prospective real-world evaluation will estimate and characterize the heart-failure related clinical workload burden associated with implementing a new care pathway (Triage-HF Plus) for remote monitoring and management in a cohort of device patients at 3 hospital sites in North West England as compared to the heart-failure related clinical workload burden prior to using this new care pathway. Triage-HF Plus incorporates the Triage-HF algorithm which is a device-based algorithm that uses the input from the integrated device diagnostics to detect changes in physiological parameters which may indicate an individual's increased risk of heart failure event in the 30 days after a high Triage-HF score.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

750

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Manchester, United Kingdom, M13 9WL
        • Recruiting
        • Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
        • Contact:
      • Manchester, United Kingdom, M13 9WL
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Paul Callan
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Niall Campbell
    • Lancashire
      • Oldham, Lancashire, United Kingdom, OL1 2JH
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Oldham Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Matthew Kahn

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult patients aged > 18 years with Medtronic CareLink® and Triage-HF compatible cardiac device in situ undergoing remote monitoring.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient implanted with a Medtronic ICD, CRT-D, or CRT-P device that is Triage-HF compatible and capable of automated transmission. Note: Remote monitoring data will not be available for 60 days post a new or replacement implant but patients can be enrolled in the evaluation any time after implant.
  • Patient (or patient's legally authorized representative) is willing and able to provide written informed consent.
  • Patients with CareAlerts already turned ON will be included in the prospective part of the evaluation but their data may be excluded from the pre-Triage-HF Plus (current state) data analysis.
  • Patients willing and able to have CareLink monitor active at all times.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient is enrolled in another conflicting evaluation/study that could confound the results of this evaluation by increasing clinic workload burden for that patient and/or impact clinical interventions and patient outcomes
  • All patients with non-Triage-HF compatible devices
  • All patients with devices that require manual transmission (non-automated)
  • Patient is unwilling or unable to comply with the protocol, including follow-up visits and CareLink transmissions.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of clinical touchpoints will be used to calculate clinical workload burden
Time Frame: Duration of study, expected 18 months
The workload burden associated with using the Triage HF+ care pathway as compared to the heart failure-related clinic burden prior to using the Triage HF+ care pathway will be calculated using clinical touchpoints including number of hospitalisations, number of A&E/ MAU visits, number of outpatient appointments, number of remote scheduled device follow ups, and number of telephone contacts.
Duration of study, expected 18 months
Time for completing clinical touchpoints will be used to calculate clinical workload burden
Time Frame: Duration of study, expected 18 months
Estimated time for completing clinical touchpoint activities will be calculated from established NHS guidelines/ standards and used to calculate clinical workload burden.
Duration of study, expected 18 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of clinical touchpoints pre-Triage-HF Plus (current state) compared to post-Triage-HF Plus Implementation (future state, prospective).
Time Frame: Duration of study, expected 18 months
Secondary, ancillary metrics (descriptive statistics) will be collected to characterize the clinical context pre-Triage-HF Plus (current state) and post-Triage-HF Plus Implementation (future state, prospective) and guide further improvements. Metrics include total number of Triage HF transmissions, total scheduled transmissions, number of low/ medium/high Triage HF risk scores, number of high Triage HF episodes, number of patients with high Triage HF risk scores, and number of hospitalisations.
Duration of study, expected 18 months
Cost of Triage-HF Plus pathway at each site
Time Frame: Duration of study, expected 18 months
Estimated time for completing clinical touchpoint activities will be calculated from established NHS guidelines/ standards and used to calculate the cost of the Triage HF pathway at each site.
Duration of study, expected 18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 6, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 30, 2025

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 5, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 22, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

November 26, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 15, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 14, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • B00454

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on TRIAGE HF Pathway

3
Subscribe