Co-induction Technique Compared to Standard Inhalational and Intravenous Induction Techniques

February 22, 2020 updated by: omar ahmad ababneh, University of Jordan

A Novel Co-induction Technique Compared to Standard Inhalational and Intravenous Induction Techniques: a Prospective Randomized Control Study

Co-induction technique refers to the use of a combination of medications to reach the desired therapeutic target. In the present study, the investigators examined the safety of a novel co-induction approach that relied on a simple timing and dosing alterations to the classical approaches of inhalational sevoflurane and propofol induction. The significance of this study is to find a reliable safe alternative method of induction that can provide optimal parameters,when compared to the classical methods of induction.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Co-induction technique refers to the use of a combination of medications to reach the desired therapeutic target. This technique is considered an approach that can be of a great benefit to patients with chronic medical illnesses and those who have moderate to high risk for general anaesthesia.

In the present study, the investigators examined the safety of a novel co-induction approach that relied on a simple timing and dosing alterations to the classical approaches of inhalational sevoflurane and propofol induction. The significance of this study is to find a reliable safe alternative method of induction that can provide optimal parameters,when compared to the classical methods of induction. The investigators evaluated the time needed for laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion, number of LMA insertion trials, succession of LMA insertion, adverse events related to the airway, respiratory and cardiovascular systems, haemodynamic stability and satisfaction scores of enrolled patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

105

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Amman, Jordan, 11942
        • Jordan University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients with Age ≥ 65 years.
  • American Society of Anaesthesiologists' (ASA) score II or III.
  • minimally invasive endoscopic urological procedures.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patient refusal.
  • Age < 65 years.
  • family history of malignant hyperthermia.
  • prolonged surgery that needed intubation.
  • body mass index (BMI) > 35 kg/m2.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group P
Patient received a dose of 1.5 mg/kg of Propofol slowly over 2 minutes for induction.
Patients were given 1.5 mcg/Kg of fentanyl intravenously. two minutes after the fentanyl dose, a dose of 1.5 mg/kg of propofol slowly over 2 minutes.
Experimental: Group S
Patient received 8% sevoflurane through sealed plastic facemask at 8 L/min flow of oxygen.
Patients were given 1.5 mcg/Kg of fentanyl intravenously. two minutes after the fentanyl dose, patient received 8% inhalational sevoflurane through sealed plastic face mask at 8 L/min flow of oxygen.
Experimental: Group C
Patient received 4% sevoflurane through sealed plastic facemask at 8 L/min flow of oxygen for 2 minutes, followed by a dose of 0.75 mg/kg of propofol given slowly.
Patients were given 1.5 mcg/Kg of fentanyl intravenously. two minutes after the fentanyl dose, patient received 4% sevoflurane through sealed plastic face mask at 8 L/min flow of oxygen for 2 minutes, followed by a dose of 0.75 mg/kg of propofol given slowly.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intraoperative respiratory adverse events
Time Frame: 8 months
The investigators recorded the occurrence of transient apnea intraoperatively, in addition to laryngeal spasm, coughing, gagging and increased salivation. The study chart included the documentation these common adverse events, the timing of occurrence, and the intervention required to manage these events.
8 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time for successful laryngeal mask airway insertion
Time Frame: 8 months
The investigators assessed the time needed for LMA insertion. The timer was started upon giving the fentanyl, recording the time till successful insertion of laryngeal mask airway.
8 months
Blood pressure stability
Time Frame: 8 months
The investigators recorded patients' blood pressure readings throughout the induction procedure.
8 months
Heart rate stability
Time Frame: 8 months
The investigators recorded patients' heart rate throughout the induction procedure.
8 months
Changes in oxygen saturation
Time Frame: 8 months
The investigators recorded patients' oxygen saturation throughout the induction procedure.
8 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 2, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

January 3, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 20, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 22, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

February 26, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 26, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 22, 2020

Last Verified

February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anesthesia

Clinical Trials on Induction using propofol

Subscribe