Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Co-induction Technique Compared to Standard Inhalational and Intravenous Induction Techniques

22. februar 2020 opdateret af: omar ahmad ababneh, University of Jordan

A Novel Co-induction Technique Compared to Standard Inhalational and Intravenous Induction Techniques: a Prospective Randomized Control Study

Co-induction technique refers to the use of a combination of medications to reach the desired therapeutic target. In the present study, the investigators examined the safety of a novel co-induction approach that relied on a simple timing and dosing alterations to the classical approaches of inhalational sevoflurane and propofol induction. The significance of this study is to find a reliable safe alternative method of induction that can provide optimal parameters,when compared to the classical methods of induction.

Studieoversigt

Status

Afsluttet

Betingelser

Intervention / Behandling

Detaljeret beskrivelse

Co-induction technique refers to the use of a combination of medications to reach the desired therapeutic target. This technique is considered an approach that can be of a great benefit to patients with chronic medical illnesses and those who have moderate to high risk for general anaesthesia.

In the present study, the investigators examined the safety of a novel co-induction approach that relied on a simple timing and dosing alterations to the classical approaches of inhalational sevoflurane and propofol induction. The significance of this study is to find a reliable safe alternative method of induction that can provide optimal parameters,when compared to the classical methods of induction. The investigators evaluated the time needed for laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion, number of LMA insertion trials, succession of LMA insertion, adverse events related to the airway, respiratory and cardiovascular systems, haemodynamic stability and satisfaction scores of enrolled patients.

Undersøgelsestype

Interventionel

Tilmelding (Faktiske)

105

Fase

  • Ikke anvendelig

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiesteder

  • Jordan
      • Amman, Jordan, 11942
        • Jordan University Hospital

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

65 år og ældre (Ældre voksen)

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ja

Køn, der er berettiget til at studere

Alle

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients with Age ≥ 65 years.
  • American Society of Anaesthesiologists' (ASA) score II or III.
  • minimally invasive endoscopic urological procedures.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patient refusal.
  • Age < 65 years.
  • family history of malignant hyperthermia.
  • prolonged surgery that needed intubation.
  • body mass index (BMI) > 35 kg/m2.

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Primært formål: Forebyggelse
  • Tildeling: Randomiseret
  • Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
  • Maskning: Ingen (Åben etiket)

Våben og indgreb

Deltagergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Eksperimentel: Group P
Patient received a dose of 1.5 mg/kg of Propofol slowly over 2 minutes for induction.
Medicin: Induction using propofol
Patients were given 1.5 mcg/Kg of fentanyl intravenously. two minutes after the fentanyl dose, a dose of 1.5 mg/kg of propofol slowly over 2 minutes.
Eksperimentel: Group S
Patient received 8% sevoflurane through sealed plastic facemask at 8 L/min flow of oxygen.
Medicin: Induction using sevoflurane
Patients were given 1.5 mcg/Kg of fentanyl intravenously. two minutes after the fentanyl dose, patient received 8% inhalational sevoflurane through sealed plastic face mask at 8 L/min flow of oxygen.
Eksperimentel: Group C
Patient received 4% sevoflurane through sealed plastic facemask at 8 L/min flow of oxygen for 2 minutes, followed by a dose of 0.75 mg/kg of propofol given slowly.
Medicin: Induction using propofol and sevoflurane
Patients were given 1.5 mcg/Kg of fentanyl intravenously. two minutes after the fentanyl dose, patient received 4% sevoflurane through sealed plastic face mask at 8 L/min flow of oxygen for 2 minutes, followed by a dose of 0.75 mg/kg of propofol given slowly.

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Intraoperative respiratory adverse events
Tidsramme: 8 months
The investigators recorded the occurrence of transient apnea intraoperatively, in addition to laryngeal spasm, coughing, gagging and increased salivation. The study chart included the documentation these common adverse events, the timing of occurrence, and the intervention required to manage these events.
8 months

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Time for successful laryngeal mask airway insertion
Tidsramme: 8 months
The investigators assessed the time needed for LMA insertion. The timer was started upon giving the fentanyl, recording the time till successful insertion of laryngeal mask airway.
8 months
Blood pressure stability
Tidsramme: 8 months
The investigators recorded patients' blood pressure readings throughout the induction procedure.
8 months
Heart rate stability
Tidsramme: 8 months
The investigators recorded patients' heart rate throughout the induction procedure.
8 months
Changes in oxygen saturation
Tidsramme: 8 months
The investigators recorded patients' oxygen saturation throughout the induction procedure.
8 months

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Sponsor

University of Jordan

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

1. maj 2016

Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)

2. januar 2017

Studieafslutning (Faktiske)

3. januar 2017

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

20. februar 2020

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

22. februar 2020

Først opslået (Faktiske)

26. februar 2020

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

26. februar 2020

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

22. februar 2020

Sidst verificeret

1. februar 2020

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Nøgleord

Yderligere relevante MeSH-vilkår

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

  • 10/2016/4597

Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)

Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?

INGEN

Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt

Ingen

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt

Ingen

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Kliniske forsøg med Anæstesi

Kliniske forsøg med Induction using propofol

Søg i lignende forsøg

Sponsorer og samarbejdspartnere

Medicinske tilstande

Narkotikainterventioner

CROs by country

CROs in Lebanon

Betingelser

Sjældne sygdomme

Narkotikainterventioner

Kosttilskud

Sponsor / samarbejdspartnere

Placeringer

3
Abonner