Pain Response Evaluation of a Combined Intervention to Cope Effectively (PRECICE)

February 27, 2024 updated by: Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Pain Response Evaluation of a Combined Intervention to Cope Effectively (PRECICE)

The purpose of this research is is to determine if the combination of non-opioid medication (duloxetine) and web-based pain-coping skills training (PCST) is beneficial for individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

With this study, the study team hopes to address two important unanswered questions: (1) Does combination treatment consisting of duloxetine and web-based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) optimize treatment outcomes? (2) Would adherence-focused guidance delivered by nurse clinician using motivational interviewing (MI) techniques enhance treatment effectiveness? This study is significant because the study team aims to optimize pain-related treatment outcomes at the primary care level where most patients with pain are managed. Importantly, the use of nurse clinician providing adherence-focused guidance (as opposed to content-focused guidance) on the continued practice (or use) of pain coping skills increases the likelihood that the study's intervention is scalable in the future. Effective, accessible and scalable psychoeducational treatments are needed to manage CMP in real world clinic settings.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

280

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157
        • Wake Forest Baptist Health Department of Rheumatology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients at the primary care clinic with daily pain for 3 months or longer affecting the low back, neck, hip, knee or widespread pain;
  • at least moderate in BPI global pain severity

Exclusion Criteria:

  • uncontrolled hypertension (because duloxetine rarely increases blood pressure)
  • active suicidal ideation
  • planned elective surgery during the study period (to avoid the confounding effect of possible complicated post-surgery recovery course on the primary outcome)
  • ongoing unresolved disability claims
  • inflammatory arthritis (e.g., lupus and ankylosing spondylitis)
  • cancer-related musculoskeletal pain
  • pregnancy
  • history of bipolar disorder or schizophrenia
  • narrow angle glaucoma
  • severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance <30)
  • current use of duloxetine
  • current use of any of the following medications (to avoid adverse drug-to-drug interactions): tricyclic antidepressant > 25 mg daily dose, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, fluoxetine, sertraline, paroxetine, citalopram, escitalopram, venlafaxine, milnacipran, mirtazapine, gabapentin or aripiprazole, serotonin precursors (e.g., tryptophan), and strong CYP1A2 inhibitors (e.g., ciprofloxacin, other fluoroquinolones, fluvoxamine and verapamil)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: behavioral intervention, nurse support plus medication
Subjects randomized to this arm will receive duloxetine, web-based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and nurse support.
All participants will receive duloxetine 30 mg once daily for one week and 60 mg once daily for 24 weeks.
Other Names:
  • Cymbalta
  • Irenka
The web-based CBT program is an automated program (i.e., users learn skills with interactive, personalized training without any therapist contact) that includes 8, 35- to 45-minute training sessions, each of which provides an educational rationale and training in cognitive or behavioral pain coping skill drawn from face-to-face CBT.
Subjects randomized to the duloxetine and web-based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) with nurse support will receive 6 phone calls from MI trained nurse at week 3, 6, 10, 14, 18 and 22. Telephone sessions may run for 20 minutes on the average.
Experimental: behavioral intervention plus medication
Subjects randomized to this arm will receive duloxetine and web-based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT).
All participants will receive duloxetine 30 mg once daily for one week and 60 mg once daily for 24 weeks.
Other Names:
  • Cymbalta
  • Irenka
The web-based CBT program is an automated program (i.e., users learn skills with interactive, personalized training without any therapist contact) that includes 8, 35- to 45-minute training sessions, each of which provides an educational rationale and training in cognitive or behavioral pain coping skill drawn from face-to-face CBT.
Active Comparator: medication only
Subjects randomized to this arm will receive duloxetine only.
All participants will receive duloxetine 30 mg once daily for one week and 60 mg once daily for 24 weeks.
Other Names:
  • Cymbalta
  • Irenka

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)
Time Frame: Baseline
BPI score ranges from 0 to 10 with a higher score denoting a higher pain severity.
Baseline
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)
Time Frame: week 13 of treatment phase
BPI score ranges from 0 to 10 with a higher score denoting a higher pain severity.
week 13 of treatment phase
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)
Time Frame: week 25 of treatment phase
BPI score ranges from 0 to 10 with a higher score denoting a higher pain severity.
week 25 of treatment phase

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)
Time Frame: week 13 of treatment phase, week 25 of treatment phase
Adult Self-Reported Measures on physical health (fatigue, pain intensity, pain interference, physical function, sleep disturbance, pain behavior and sleep-related impairment) and social health (ability to participate in social roles and activities). The values of the response to each question will be summed in order to determine the raw score. This must then be converted to the T-score. T-scores are standardized with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. I.e. a T-score of 40 would be one standard deviation lower than the mean. A higher PROMIS T-score represents more of the concept being measured. For positively-worded concepts like Physical Function a T-score of 60 is one standard deviation better than average. By comparison, a Physical Function T-score of 40 is one SD worse than average.
week 13 of treatment phase, week 25 of treatment phase
The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Time Frame: Baseline, week 13 of treatment phase, week 25 of treatment phase
13-item scale that describes the catastrophic thoughts and feelings that people may have in response to pain. The total score ranges 0 (no catastrophizing) to 52 (severe catastrophizing).
Baseline, week 13 of treatment phase, week 25 of treatment phase
Global Rating of Change
Time Frame: Baseline, week 13 of treatment phase, week 25 of treatment phase
Score ranges from -5 through 5 with 5 denoting a better outcome; 0 denotes no change
Baseline, week 13 of treatment phase, week 25 of treatment phase
Patient Health Questionnaire 8-Item Depression Scale (PHQ-8)
Time Frame: Baseline, week 13 of treatment phase, week 25 of treatment phase
Score is the sum of the 8 items. Score ranges from 0-24. A score of 10 or greater is considered major depression, 20 or more is severe major depression.
Baseline, week 13 of treatment phase, week 25 of treatment phase
Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7)
Time Frame: Baseline, week 13 of treatment phase, week 25 of treatment phase
Score ranges from 0-24. Scores of 5, 10, and 15 are the respective cut-offs for mild, moderate, and severe anxiety. Further evaluation is recommended when a score of 10 or greater is recorded.
Baseline, week 13 of treatment phase, week 25 of treatment phase
Patient Health Quality Anxiety-Depression Scale (PHQ-ADS)
Time Frame: Baseline, week 13 of treatment phase, week 25 of treatment phase
PHQ-ADS is a single measure for assessing psychological distress in clinical practice and research. Scores range from 0-30. PHQ-ADS cut points of 10, 20 and 30 were shown to represent mild, moderate, and severe levels of psychological distress, respectively.
Baseline, week 13 of treatment phase, week 25 of treatment phase
Frequency of Practicing Pain Coping Skills
Time Frame: week 13 of treatment phase, week 25 of treatment phase
Study team will ask participants how many days they practiced pain coping skills in the past 2 weeks (maximum of 14)
week 13 of treatment phase, week 25 of treatment phase
Opioid Morphine Equivalent (OME)
Time Frame: Baseline, week 13 of treatment phase, week 25 of treatment phase
The study will use self-reported opioid type, medical record-based dosage and self-reported daily frequency to calculate the OME, reported in milligrams per day. The OME is calculated by multiplying dosage by daily frequency by a conversion factor for each opioid based on opioid strength.
Baseline, week 13 of treatment phase, week 25 of treatment phase
relevant concomitant medication use--non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS)
Time Frame: week 13 of treatment phase, week 25 of treatment phase
Number of subjects who use NSAIDS between visits will be collected
week 13 of treatment phase, week 25 of treatment phase
relevant concomitant medication use--muscle relaxants
Time Frame: week 13 of treatment phase, week 25 of treatment phase
Number of subjects who use muscle relaxants between visits will be collected
week 13 of treatment phase, week 25 of treatment phase
Number of Subjects who use Physical Therapy between visits
Time Frame: week 13 of treatment phase, week 25 of treatment phase
week 13 of treatment phase, week 25 of treatment phase
Number of Subjects who use occupational therapy between visits
Time Frame: week 13 of treatment phase, week 25 of treatment phase
week 13 of treatment phase, week 25 of treatment phase
Number of Subjects who use acupuncture between visits
Time Frame: week 13 of treatment phase, week 25 of treatment phase
week 13 of treatment phase, week 25 of treatment phase
Number of Subjects who use massage between visits
Time Frame: week 13 of treatment phase, week 25 of treatment phase
week 13 of treatment phase, week 25 of treatment phase
Number of Subjects who go to a chiropractor between visits
Time Frame: week 13 of treatment phase, week 25 of treatment phase
week 13 of treatment phase, week 25 of treatment phase
Number of Subjects who go to a pain specialist between visits
Time Frame: week 13 of treatment phase, week 25 of treatment phase
week 13 of treatment phase, week 25 of treatment phase
Number of Subjects who use pain psychologist between visits
Time Frame: week 13 of treatment phase, week 25 of treatment phase
week 13 of treatment phase, week 25 of treatment phase

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Dennis C Ang, MD, Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 24, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 15, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 15, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

May 20, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 29, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 27, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Protecting the rights and privacy of our study participants is our first priority. After Internal Review Board approval for data sharing is obtained, a dataset that is de-identified and in accordance with HIPAA and other state and federal right to privacy laws will be developed by the investigators. Data obtained during the study will be made available beginning after publication of the main findings of the study. Notification of availability of de-identified data will be made in the acknowledgement section of all subsequent publications resulting from the study. Data will be provided in standard SAS format. Investigators interested in obtaining de-identified study data will be instructed to send a blank compact disc to the primary investigator for copying.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Pain

Clinical Trials on duloxetine

3
Subscribe