A Comparative Study Using Two 3D Printed Occlusal Splints for Patients With Tempromandibular Disorder

June 29, 2020 updated by: mostafa mohamed sobhy, Cairo University

A Comparative Study Using Two 3D Printed Occlusal Splints for Patients With Tempromandibular Disorder (A Randomized Cross Over Clinical Trial)

• to compare the relief of pain for patients with anterior disc displacement with reduction between two groups; in the first group a digitally formed stabilizing splint followed by an anterior repositioning splint (ARS) and the second group a digitally fabricated (ARS) splints followed by a stabilizing splints

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

24

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • • TMDs according to the research diagnostic criteria (RDC)8 which include: i. Painful TMJ audible and palpable click unilateral or bilateral ii. Presence of clicking during opening. iii. TMJ tenderness.

    • Fully dentate patients without any malocclusion (natural or restored by fixed prothesis) and good oral hygiene.
    • Co-operative patient that should show motivation to follow up.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • • Patients with systemic diseases which could affect TMJ, e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthrosis, Myasthenia Gravis and fibromyalgia.

    • Patients taking analgesic, muscle relaxant, or anti-inflammatory drugs were excluded because such drugs could influence the results.
    • Patients with removable dental prosthesis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: interventional group
patient using two types of splints (3d Anterior Rrepositioning Splint then printed stabilizing splint)
  • Scaning of the maxillary and mandibular cast in the centric relation.
  • The CAD/ CAM splints will be designed using Exocad s.
  • The design will include all maxillary teeth and the occlusal surfaces will be flat and smooth.
  • The difference in design between the ARS and the stabilization splint, is that the ARS will have an anterior ramp to allow for posterior disocclusion of posterior teeth, while the stabilization splint will not have such a pronounced anterior ramp.
  • Both splints will be printed using Dent2 3D printer and then cured using Dentcure.
  • All patient will be asked to wear their spints during sleeping only.
  • In each group, patient will be recalled after 1week,2 weeks 1,2and 3monthes then change for the other splint for another 3 months .
Active Comparator: control group
patient using two types of splints (3d printed stabilizing splint then Anterior Rrepositioning Splint)
  • Scaning of the maxillary and mandibular cast in the centric relation.
  • The CAD/ CAM splints will be designed using Exocad s.
  • The design will include all maxillary teeth and the occlusal surfaces will be flat and smooth.
  • The difference in design between the ARS and the stabilization splint, is that the ARS will have an anterior ramp to allow for posterior disocclusion of posterior teeth, while the stabilization splint will not have such a pronounced anterior ramp.
  • Both splints will be printed using Dent2 3D printer and then cured using Dentcure.
  • All patient will be asked to wear their spints during sleeping only.
  • In each group, patient will be recalled after 1week,2 weeks 1,2and 3monthes then change for the other splint for another 3 months .

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
pain relief
Time Frame: 6 months
questionnaire will be used to evaluate the pain
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

July 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

July 26, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 26, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 29, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 29, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

July 2, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 2, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 29, 2020

Last Verified

June 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Temporomandibular Disorder

Clinical Trials on splints

3
Subscribe