Relationship Between Hamstring Length and Gluteus Maximums in Mechanical Low Back Pain

October 4, 2020 updated by: Nasr Awad Abdelkader Othman, Cairo University

Relationship Between Hamstring Length and Gluteus Maximums Strength With and Without Normalization in Mechanical Low Back Pain

The aim of this study was to determine the correlation between hamstring length and gluteus maximus strength with and without normalization in patients with mechanical low back pain

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

seventy-three patients diagnosed as mechanical low back pain. Firstly, gluteus maximus (GM) strength was measured isometrically as a force (kg) and then converted to torque (Nm). GM strength was normalized for body weight and height using the following formula: % (body weight × h) = torque (N × m) ×100 / body weight (N) × h (m), then assessment of hamstring length flexibility using the active knee extension method.

Data was collected and the correlation was determined.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

73

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Giza, Egypt
        • Cairo University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 40 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

  • Male and female patients
  • Age ranged from 18-40 years
  • Body mass index ranged from 25-30 kg/m2

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Patients diagnosed as mechanical low back pain (MLBP) with very high grade mechanical inflammatory low back pain (MIL) index.
  • Age ranged from 18 to 40 years.
  • Body mass index ranged from 25 to 30 kg/m2

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of previous fractures, surgeries, malignancies, trauma, rheumatoid arthritis, spondylosis, and spondylolisthesis.
  • History of lower limb injuries in the last six months before the study.
  • Inability to correctly produce maximal Gluteus Maximus contraction in a pain-free ROM.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Gluteus muscle torque
Time Frame: 20 minutes
The gluteus maximus strength was evaluated by using hand-held dynamometer (HHD). The patient was asked to lie in the prone position. Belt was used to support the pelvis, then the patient was asked to maximally extend the hip joint with the knee joints flexed to 90°). Resistance belt (non-elastic strap) was placed 15 cm above the knee joint above popliteal fossa with the Hand-held dynamometer below it. Each subject was instructed to perform maximal isometric hip extension for 5 seconds. Measurement was done three times, with 2-minutes rest between trials. Subject's hand was places behind waist to control the substitute motions of arm or hand. The peak force for each trial was recorded, and the average value was calculated
20 minutes
Hamstring length
Time Frame: 20 minutes
Patient was positioned supine with the non-tested limb flat with knee extended and supported with strap over the mid-thigh to eliminate any substitutive movement. An another strap was rapped over the pelvis for fixation, to maintain 90 degrees of the hip joint, a wooden frame was then placed on the plinth in line with the participant's anterior superior iliac spine of the pelvis. The participant was asked to flex the hip of the test leg so that their thigh touching the wooden apparatus all over test time
20 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 10, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 5, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 18, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 18, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

September 24, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 6, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 4, 2020

Last Verified

September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • P.T.REC/012/002047

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mechanical Low Back Pain

3
Subscribe