The Correlation Between Family Member Presence and The Consent for Regional Anaesthesia for Caesarean Section (BSU)

September 6, 2023 updated by: Mahmoud Hussein Bahr, Beni-Suef University

The Correlation Between Family Member Presence and The Consent for Regional Anaesthesia for Cesarean Section of Primigravida: A Prospective Observational Study

Patient's safety and satisfaction are major concerns of anesthesiologists and obstetricians. According to evidence guidelines, and quality markers, regional anesthesia is preferred over general in obstetric surgery. Already a high level of anxiety is present in obstetric patients preoperatively.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Hospital anxiety is commonly encountered, and it is reported to be seen in 60%-80% of patients who undergo surgery. There are many causes of preoperative anxiety including fear of death due to anesthesia or surgical procedure and fear of preoperative or postoperative pain.

Preoperative anxiety varies according to the patient's age, gender, educational status, history of previous operations, and medical status as well as the type of surgery and type of anesthesia. Patient's safety and satisfaction are major concerns of anesthesiologists and obstetricians. According to evidence guidelines, and quality markers, regional anesthesia is preferred over general in obstetric surgery. Already a high level of anxiety is present in obstetric patients preoperatively.

The anxious patients tend to prefer general anesthesia (GA) for cesarean section (CS). The patient refusal is the main contraindication for applying spinal anesthesia (SA) during CS. The anxiety can be reduced variably by non-pharmacologic and pharmacologic methods including preoperative visit, information, and music, listening to Holy Quran recitation, hypnosis, nitrous oxide, and benzodiazepines. Intravenous sedation can control the anxiety in 90% of patients subjected to spinal procedures. While the evidence supports the benefits of procedural sedation for distressed, anxious pregnant women.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

110

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt, 62511
        • Faculty of medicine.Beni-suef university

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 40 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

110 primi gravida Patients aging 20_40 years, ASA physical status I undergoing elective CS •

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • primi gravida Patients aging 20_40 years, ASA physical status I undergoing elective CS •

Exclusion criteria:

High risk pregnancy eg: pre eclampsia Absolute contra indiction for SA eg: severe anaemia Emergent CS. Patients with previous exposure to anaesthesia ( spinal or general ). Patients with educational level more than high school.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acceptance rate to spinal anaethesia during CS
Time Frame: Preoperative .

Questionnaire : The first decision for anesthesia, either spinal or general, will be recorded.

Then, patients who refuse SA and prefer general anesthesia (GA) will be consulted again as regards SA with presence of close relative for comfortable spinal procedure. Their last choice is the second decision that determines the final type of anesthesia to be implemented.

Preoperative .
Anxiety score by the visual analogue score (VAS).
Time Frame: Preoperative
the visual analog score (VAS) from 0- 10, where 10 is the maximum anxiety level
Preoperative
Satisfaction rating scale
Time Frame: 6 hours Postoperative

Scale ( 1 - 10 )

1is the lowest satisfaction 10 is the best satisfaction

6 hours Postoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
AGE
Time Frame: Preoperative
age per years
Preoperative
heart rate (beat/min)
Time Frame: Preoperative
heart rate (beat/min)
Preoperative
Mean arterial blood pressure MAP (mmHg)
Time Frame: Preoperative
Mean arterial blood pressure MAP (mmHg)
Preoperative
peripheral oxygen saturation (Spo2)
Time Frame: Preoperative
peripheral oxygen saturation (Spo2)
Preoperative
WEIGHT
Time Frame: Preoperative
weight per kilograms
Preoperative
Height
Time Frame: Preoperative
Height per centimeter
Preoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Amira F Elgamel, Lecturer, Faculty of medicine.Beni-suef university

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 27, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 2, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

November 3, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 8, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 6, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • FMBSUREC/04102020/ Bahr

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The surgeon and the anesthetist will discuss the exclusion criteria, and then discuss the information about spinal and general anesthesia with the illegible patients. The first decision for anesthesia, either spinal or general, will be recorded.

Then, patients who refuse SA and prefer general anesthesia (GA) will be consulted again as regards SA with presence of close relative for comfortable spinal procedure. Their last choice is the second decision that determines the final type of anesthesia to be implemented. The acceptance rate of SA with presence of close relative will be the primary outcome. A written consent will be taken. The number of crying patients and anxiety causes will be documented just before SA. The anxiety score will be assessed by the visual analog score (VAS) from 0- 10, where 10 is the maximum anxiety level .

IPD Sharing Time Frame

3 months

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

drmahmoudbahr@gmail.com

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe