- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04622267
Barbed Suture for Hysterotomy Closure During Cesarean Section
Barbed Suture: A Look at Its Use for Hysterotomy Closure During Cesarean Section
This is a randomized controlled trial. The purpose of this study is to see if patients whose uterine incision (hysterotomy), at the time of scheduled cesarean section, is closed with barbed suture, have less blood loss compared to women whose incision is closed with the standard suture (vicryl). The primary outcome is quantification of blood loss (QBL). Secondary outcomes include time for hysterotomy closure, need for additional hemostatic sutures, rate of endometritis, use of hemostatic agents, and differences in pain which will be assessed by a telephone screening in the days following delivery.
Study participation will last 1 year and will include the following research procedures :
- Randomization to barbed suture vs. standard suture
- Collection of data for primary and secondary outcomes
- Telephone survey 2 weeks following the procedure to assess pain, bowel/bladder habits, and evidence of wound infection. The barbed suture is approved by the FDA for use in soft tissue approximation and this is not an off-label usage.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States, 10029
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- All patients undergoing a scheduled primary cesarean section at Mount Sinai Hospital
- age 18-64.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Multifetal gestations
- Placenta previas
- Pre-term patients
- Patients with prior uterine incisions or a coagulopathy (DIC, Von Willebrands Disease, etc)
- Patients undergoing an unplanned or emergency cesarean section
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Standard suture
Standard antimicrobial suture (vicryl) - control arm
|
to close a C-section incision
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Barbed suture
Barbed suture type is STRATAFIX Symmetric PDS Plus Knotless Tissue
|
to close a C-section incision
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Quantitative Blood Loss
Time Frame: Day 1, At delivery
|
Quantification of blood loss (QBL)
|
Day 1, At delivery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Rate of Surgical Site Infections (SSI)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
Rate of SSI (any of superficial wound infection, deep wound infection, and endometritis)
|
6 weeks
|
|
Time for Hysterotomy Closure
Time Frame: Day 1, At delivery
|
Time for hysterotomy closure
|
Day 1, At delivery
|
|
Number of Participants Who Need Additional Hemostatic Sutures
Time Frame: Day 1, At delivery
|
Day 1, At delivery
|
|
|
Number of Hemostatic Sutures
Time Frame: Day 1, At delivery
|
Number of hemostatic sutures needed during procedure
|
Day 1, At delivery
|
|
Number of Participants With Surgical Site Infections (SSI)
Time Frame: Day 1, At delivery
|
Number of Participants to assess rate of SSI (any of superficial wound infection, deep wound infection, and endometritis)
|
Day 1, At delivery
|
|
Change in Pain Score
Time Frame: Day 1, At delivery and 2 weeks
|
Change in pain score at 2 weeks from baseline. Pain score from 0 to 10, with higher score indicating more pain. Follow up pain assessment by a telephone screening 2 weeks following delivery. |
Day 1, At delivery and 2 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Calvin Lambert, MD, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Greenberg JA, Goldman RH. Barbed suture: a review of the technology and clinical uses in obstetrics and gynecology. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2013;6(3-4):107-15.
- Pfuntner A, Wier LM, Stocks C. Most Frequent Procedures Performed in U.S. Hospitals, 2010. 2013 Feb. In: Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2006 Feb-. Statistical Brief #149. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK132428/
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- GCO 20-2571
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.