Epidemiology and Prognosis of ARDS After Pulmonary Resection Surgery (ARDS_THO)

March 29, 2021 updated by: University Hospital, Montpellier

The improvement in ARDS mortality over the last 20 years seems to be largely explained by the reduction of mechanical ventilation-induced injury (VILI). VILI is essentially related to volotrauma closely associated with "strain" and "stress". The pulmonary stress corresponds to the transpulmonary pressure (alveolar pressure - pleural pressure), and the strain to the change in lung volume related to the functional residual capacity (FRC) of the injured lung at PEEP = 0. The volotrauma corresponds therefore to the generalized excess of stress and strain on the injured lung.

The initial therapeutic strategy consists in protective ventilation with a tidal volume of 6 ml/kg of theoretical ideal weight (predicted by height), associated with a high respiratory rate between 25 and 30 cycles per minute to control PaCO2 (< 50 mmHg), apply a high positive expiratory pressure PEEP according to FiO2, maintain a plateau pressure (PP) lower than 30 cmH20, reduce instrumental dead space, use curarization, recruitment maneuvers such as alternate prone, improve ventilation-perfusion adequacy using inhaled NO.

As a last resort, extracorporeal oxygenation by veno-venous ECMO is a device to supplement respiratory function by improving oxygenation and ensuring decarboxylation. Veno-venous ECMO is indicated in severe ARDS with PaO2/FiO2 < 80 mmHg and/or when mechanical ventilation becomes unsafe due to increased plateau pressure despite optimized ARDS management including high PEEP levels, curarization and prone position.

After lung resection surgery, the incidence of ARDS is 2-8% and its prognosis remains more poor, despite advances in management, with a mortality of up to 60%. Risk factors include intraoperative vascular filling, type of pulmonary resection, and predicted postoperative respiratory function. Early support with VV ECMO is vital in some patients to treat severe hypoxemia, due to variable surgical reduction of lung parenchyma depending on carcinological involvement or initial lung pathology. ). There are very few data concerning these patients with pulmonary resection. The primary objective of this study is to describe the prevalence of ARDS and the risk factors for its occurrence after pulmonary resection surgery. The secondary objective is to compare the ventilation parameters (especially motor pressure) in patients with reduced lung parenchyma in ARDS under VV ECMO with those who did not use VV ECMO assistance.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

50

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patient with ARDS hospitalized in the DAR ADV intensive care unit after thoracic resection surgery

Description

Inclusion criteria:

- Patient hospitalized following ARDS after thoracic resection surgery

Exclusion criteria:

- Refusal to participate after receiving the information letter

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Prevalence of ARDS
Time Frame: 1 day
Prevalence of ARDS after pulmonary resection surgery
1 day
risk factors for its occurrence after pulmonary resection surgery
Time Frame: 1 day
risk factors for its occurrence after pulmonary resection surgery
1 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
According to the usual clinico-biological data of monitoring in intensive care
Time Frame: 1 day
According to the usual clinico-biological data of monitoring in intensive care
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: hélène David, PHD, UH Montpellier

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 24, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 24, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

March 26, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 30, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 29, 2021

Last Verified

March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RECHMPL21_0191

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

NC

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on ARDS

3
Subscribe