- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04911309
Functional Exercise Training With Adolescents With Cerebral Palsy
Functional Exercise Intervention With Adolescents With Cerebral Palsy
This cross-over study analyzes a novel and inclusive approach in how therapy for adolescents with CP is administered, with the main goal of examining the effects of a functional exercise intervention on motor capability and motor capacity.
It is to investigate the effects of a functional movement-based exercise intervention in a group setting on motor capacity, motor capability and quality of life in adolescents with CP compared to standard therapy.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Cerebral palsy (CP) is a permanent disorder which affects the development of movement and posture. It causes activity limitation and is oftentimes accompanied by secondary musculoskeletal problems, disturbances of sensation, perception, cognition, communication and behavior.
In regard of the complex interplay between physical restrictions, motor disabilities, sedentary lifestyles and low participation in physical activity, an innovative exercise intervention study for adolescents with CP is intended in order to break the stated vicious cycle. This study aims at providing a novel and inclusive approach in how therapy for adolescents with CP is administered, with the main goal of examining the effects of a functional exercise intervention on motor capability and motor capacity.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Elke Viehweger, Prof. Dr. med.
- Phone Number: +41 61 704 2829
- Email: elke.viehweger@ukbb.ch
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Michèle Kläusler, Dr. med.
- Phone Number: +41 (0)61 704 2257
- Email: Michele.Klaeusler@ukbb.ch
Study Locations
-
-
-
Basel, Switzerland, 4056
- University Children's Hospital Basel
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis of CP.
- Adolescents between 12 and 18 years of age.
- Gross Motor Functional Classification System (GMFCS): I-III.
- Cognitive abilities must include: Ability to actively engage in a training session of 60 min. duration; Ability to verbally or non-verbally communicate pain or discomfort; Ability to attend training, testing and follow-up sessions. All included participants are capable of making decisions on their own and no not show any signs of mental or cognitive limitations.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any surgery or botulinum toxin treatment within 6 months prior to the start of the study or surgery/serial casting / botulinum toxin injection scheduled during the study period. Other medications can be continued as prescribed by the participants' physician.
- Known cardiovascular or pulmonary diseases that have not received medical clearance to participate in the physical exercise intervention.
- Uncontrolled seizures or epilepsy
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Group 1: 12 weeks functional exercise training followed by standard therapy
12 weeks functional exercise training twice per week, each session lasting 60 min, additionally to standard therapy. Training sessions will be performed in a group-setting consisting of minimum 4 and maximum 8 participants and coached by experienced sport scientists with the supervision of a medical doctor. The exercises will be individually pants and constantly recorded in order to allow a progression over the course of the 12 week-period. The motor tasks and exercises will be tailored to individual capacity by experienced and trained sport scientists and coaches, therefore insuring the participants' safety and a continuous and progressive monitoring of training load. After 12 weeks the groups will switch the intervention method. Group 1 will therefore reassume their standard therapy for 12 weeks. |
12 weeks functional exercise training twice per week, each session lasting 60 min
12 weeks standard therapy / treatment
|
Active Comparator: Group 2: 12 weeks standard therapy / treatment followed by 12 weeks functional exercise training
12 weeks standard therapy / treatment; the standard therapy group receives no additional exercise sessions. After 12 weeks the groups will switch the intervention method. Group 1 will therefore reassume their standard therapy for 12 weeks. After 12 weeks the groups will switch the intervention method. Group 2 will perform the same intervention which Group 1 received over the first course of 12 weeks. |
12 weeks functional exercise training twice per week, each session lasting 60 min
12 weeks standard therapy / treatment
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in Gross Motor Function Measure-66 (GMFM-66)
Time Frame: at baseline (M1), at week 12 (M2: after intervention phase 1) and at week 24 (M3: after intervention phase 2)
|
assessment tool designed to measure changes in gross motor function over time in children and adolescents with CP.
The test consist of the following five dimensions which span the spectrum of gross motor activities: a) lying and rolling; b) sitting; c) crawling and kneeling; d) standing; e) walking, running and jumping.
Scores range from 0-3, higher scores denote better performance
|
at baseline (M1), at week 12 (M2: after intervention phase 1) and at week 24 (M3: after intervention phase 2)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in height of participants
Time Frame: at baseline (M1), at week 12 (M2: after intervention phase 1) and at week 24 (M3: after intervention phase 2)
|
Change in height of participants will be measured in an upright standing position without shoes using a wall-mounted stadiometer
|
at baseline (M1), at week 12 (M2: after intervention phase 1) and at week 24 (M3: after intervention phase 2)
|
Change in body composition
Time Frame: at baseline (M1), at week 12 (M2: after intervention phase 1) and at week 24 (M3: after intervention phase 2)
|
Change in body composition will be measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) using the InBody 270 (InBody Europe B.V., Eschorn, Germany) device
|
at baseline (M1), at week 12 (M2: after intervention phase 1) and at week 24 (M3: after intervention phase 2)
|
Change in clinical assessment
Time Frame: at baseline (M1), at week 12 (M2: after intervention phase 1) and at week 24 (M3: after intervention phase 2)
|
Clinical assessment will be performed for active ankle dorsiflexion, passive range of motion (RoM), spasticity according to the modified Ashworth/Bohannon scale (scale: 0-4).
Tests resistance to passive movement about a joint with varying degrees of velocity.
Scores range from 0-4, with 5 choices.
A score of 1 indicates no resistance, and 5 indicates rigidity.
|
at baseline (M1), at week 12 (M2: after intervention phase 1) and at week 24 (M3: after intervention phase 2)
|
Change in muscle strength test (scale: 0-5)
Time Frame: at baseline (M1), at week 12 (M2: after intervention phase 1) and at week 24 (M3: after intervention phase 2)
|
Change in muscle strength test (scale: 0-5) : 0/5 = No visible muscle contraction.
5/5: Full strength
|
at baseline (M1), at week 12 (M2: after intervention phase 1) and at week 24 (M3: after intervention phase 2)
|
Change in arterial stiffness
Time Frame: at baseline (M1), at week 12 (M2: after intervention phase 1) and at week 24 (M3: after intervention phase 2)
|
Measurement of arterial stiffness using the oscillometric method.
The mean values of three valid measurements will be calculated
|
at baseline (M1), at week 12 (M2: after intervention phase 1) and at week 24 (M3: after intervention phase 2)
|
Change in Six-minute walking test
Time Frame: at baseline (M1), at week 12 (M2: after intervention phase 1) and at week 24 (M3: after intervention phase 2)
|
The six-minute walking test will be performed between 2 lines set 20m apart.
Participants will be instructed to walk as far as possible in 6 minutes.Total distance covered in six minutes as well as heart rate will be recorded.
|
at baseline (M1), at week 12 (M2: after intervention phase 1) and at week 24 (M3: after intervention phase 2)
|
Change in Handgrip Strength
Time Frame: at baseline (M1), at week 12 (M2: after intervention phase 1) and at week 24 (M3: after intervention phase 2)
|
Handgrip strength will be assessed using the Leonardo Mechanography GF®.
Participants will be asked to hold their writing hand in a 90-degree angle and to squeeze the sensor as hard as possible for a total of 5 s.
Participants will perform two valid measurements with 1 min rest in between.
Peak strength in N as well as rate of force development (RFD) will be extracted.
|
at baseline (M1), at week 12 (M2: after intervention phase 1) and at week 24 (M3: after intervention phase 2)
|
Change in Bear Hug Carry
Time Frame: at baseline (M1), at week 12 (M2: after intervention phase 1) and at week 24 (M3: after intervention phase 2)
|
The bear hug carry will be performed carrying a medicine ball over a 100m distance.
Two lines will be marked 20m apart and participants will be asked to walk the distance 5 times as fast as they can while holding the weighted ball in front of their chest.
Participants at pre-measurement will be asked to carry the lightest ball (4 lbs).
The same weight will be used in M2 as well as in M3 and the duration to walk the distance (in seconds) will be recorded.
An additional test at M2 und M3 will be proposed, in which participants may choose an-other weight if they believe to be able to increase the load and repeat the test.
This allows the measurement of individual increase in activity capacity.
Weight and time will be recorded.
|
at baseline (M1), at week 12 (M2: after intervention phase 1) and at week 24 (M3: after intervention phase 2)
|
Change in Laying on the ground and standing up (burpees)
Time Frame: at baseline (M1), at week 12 (M2: after intervention phase 1) and at week 24 (M3: after intervention phase 2)
|
Individuals are to fully lay on the floor (hands, chest and feet) and stand or jump back up (full extension in hips and knees).
The total number of repetitions over 60 seconds will be recorded
|
at baseline (M1), at week 12 (M2: after intervention phase 1) and at week 24 (M3: after intervention phase 2)
|
Change in Repeated Chair Rising Test (Box Squats):
Time Frame: at baseline (M1), at week 12 (M2: after intervention phase 1) and at week 24 (M3: after intervention phase 2)
|
The repeated chair rising test will be performed on a force plate (Leonardo Mechanography GF®, Novotec Medical GmbH, Pforzheim, Germany) with a 46cm high locked bench.
Starting from a seated position, arms crossed in front of the chest, participants will perform five complete sit-to-stand cycles as fast as possible.
Total time of the five repetitions as well as relative power and mean velocity for a cycle will be analyzed
|
at baseline (M1), at week 12 (M2: after intervention phase 1) and at week 24 (M3: after intervention phase 2)
|
Change in Isometric Mid-thigh pull
Time Frame: at baseline (M1), at week 12 (M2: after intervention phase 1) and at week 24 (M3: after intervention phase 2)
|
Isometric Mid-thigh pull (IMTP) is a multi-joint test which measures isometric force and rate of force development (RFD) in the back as well as lower body muscles and is strongly correlated to dynamic performance.
Participants will be instructed to pull as fast and as hard as possible for a duration of 5 seconds
|
at baseline (M1), at week 12 (M2: after intervention phase 1) and at week 24 (M3: after intervention phase 2)
|
Change in Push Ups
Time Frame: at baseline (M1), at week 12 (M2: after intervention phase 1) and at week 24 (M3: after intervention phase 2)
|
The push up measures upper body strength (m.
triceps brachii, m. pectoralis) and reflects the participants' ability to press and control their own body weight.
For a full repetition, participants must start with their arms extended, touch the ground with their chest, and press back into an extended position.
To find their 6 Repetition maximum (RM), participants will position their hands on a box with their feet on the floor.
As in the squat depth test, depth of the boxes increase in a 10 cm increment.
The lower the boxes, the more body weight is transferred on the upper body and must be pressed.
Three minutes rest will be granted between trials to ensure complete recovery.
The lowest box (or floor) on which 6 full repetitions can be performed will be noted.
Box height and increase of active ROM will be analyzed.
|
at baseline (M1), at week 12 (M2: after intervention phase 1) and at week 24 (M3: after intervention phase 2)
|
Change in Medicine Ball over Bar Lift
Time Frame: at baseline (M1), at week 12 (M2: after intervention phase 1) and at week 24 (M3: after intervention phase 2)
|
This test measures the ability to lift and heave an object over an obstacle and allows a high trans-fer into daily life (i.e.
lifting groceries onto a table or counter).
Participants will lift a medicine ball from the ground and drop it over a bar installed in a rack at chest height as many times as possi-ble over 60 seconds, whereby testing personnel will roll the ball back in front of participants feet after every repetition.
Weight of MB will be determined individually at M1 and corresponds to a 6 RM (whereby the lightest weight is a 4 lbs ball and the heaviest a 30 lbs medicine ball).
Number of repetitions in the given time will be recorded.
At M2 and M3, test will be repeated with the same medicine ball.
Additionally, a new 6 RM will be determined and in the case of an increase in weight the test will be repeated with the new weight.
Weight and number of repetitions will be recorded and increase in work capacity will be calculated.
|
at baseline (M1), at week 12 (M2: after intervention phase 1) and at week 24 (M3: after intervention phase 2)
|
Change in Seated sled pull
Time Frame: at baseline (M1), at week 12 (M2: after intervention phase 1) and at week 24 (M3: after intervention phase 2)
|
To assess participants' strength capacity in pulling strength, seated sled pulls will be performed.
From a seated position, participants will pull a weighted sled over 20m using their upper body.
Participants must pull the entire rope length (20m) without interruption in order for it to be counted as valid.
The resistance (weight on the sled) will be increased in every round until failure (cannot pull rope or pull is interrupted).
Weight and time of every round will be recorded.
|
at baseline (M1), at week 12 (M2: after intervention phase 1) and at week 24 (M3: after intervention phase 2)
|
Change in Maximum Power Output
Time Frame: at baseline (M1), at week 12 (M2: after intervention phase 1) and at week 24 (M3: after intervention phase 2)
|
Maximum power output and anaerobic capacity will be measured on an Assault Bike (Assault AirBike Classic ®, Ostfildern, Germany).
Participants will perform a 1-minute all-out test.
The resistance increases in line with rotations per minute (RPM).
Participants will be instructed to go as hard as they can for the entire minute.
Maximum heartrate and mean watt will be recorded and relative watt calculated to measure maximum power output.
|
at baseline (M1), at week 12 (M2: after intervention phase 1) and at week 24 (M3: after intervention phase 2)
|
Change in Accelerometry
Time Frame: at baseline (M1), at week 12 (M2: after intervention phase 1) and at week 24 (M3: after intervention phase 2)
|
In order to examine whether the intervention increases activity in daily life, patients will be asked to wear an Actigraph wGT3X-BT around their non-dominant wrist for 7 consecutive days and nights during each measuring phase.
This triaxial accelerometer records intensity and duration of acceleration and converts the signals to "activity counts", allowing an analysis of duration and intensity of movement patterns during everyday life.
|
at baseline (M1), at week 12 (M2: after intervention phase 1) and at week 24 (M3: after intervention phase 2)
|
Change in instrumented gait analysis: temporospatial parameters
Time Frame: at baseline (M1), at week 12 (M2: after intervention phase 1) and at week 24 (M3: after intervention phase 2)
|
Change in instrumented gait analysis using a motion capture system.
Participants will be asked to walk a distance of about 8 m at their self-selected speed.
From the 3D gait data, the temporospatial parameters (cadence, stride length, and walking speed) can be calculated.
|
at baseline (M1), at week 12 (M2: after intervention phase 1) and at week 24 (M3: after intervention phase 2)
|
Change in instrumented gait analysis: Movement Analysis Profile (MAP)
Time Frame: at baseline (M1), at week 12 (M2: after intervention phase 1) and at week 24 (M3: after intervention phase 2)
|
Change in instrumented gait analysis using a motion capture system.
Participants will be asked to walk a distance of about 8 m at their self-selected speed.
From the 3D gait data, the Movement Analysis Profile (MAP) can be calculated.
|
at baseline (M1), at week 12 (M2: after intervention phase 1) and at week 24 (M3: after intervention phase 2)
|
Change in instrumented gait analysis: Profile Score (GPS)
Time Frame: at baseline (M1), at week 12 (M2: after intervention phase 1) and at week 24 (M3: after intervention phase 2)
|
Change in instrumented gait analysis using a motion capture system.
Participants will be asked to walk a distance of about 8 m at their self-selected speed.
From the 3D gait data, the Gait Profile Score (GPS) can be calculated.
|
at baseline (M1), at week 12 (M2: after intervention phase 1) and at week 24 (M3: after intervention phase 2)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Elke Viehweger, Prof. Dr. med., Childrens University Hospital Basel (UKBB)
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2020-02827; ks20Klaeusler
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cerebral Palsy
-
Gazi UniversityCompletedCerebral Palsy | Cerebral Palsy, Spastic | Cerebral Palsy Spastic Diplegia | Cerebral Palsy Quadriplegic | Cerebral Palsy, MonoplegicTurkey
-
Northwestern UniversityActive, not recruitingCerebral Palsy | Diplegic Cerebral Palsy | Bilateral Cerebral PalsyUnited States
-
Centre Médico-Chirurgical de Réadaptation des Massues...RecruitingCerebral Palsy, Dyskinetic | Cerebral Palsy, Spastic | Infantile Hemiplegic Cerebral PalsyFrance
-
St Mary's University CollegeUniversity of GloucestershireUnknownCerebral Palsy | Cerebral Palsy Ataxic | Cerebral Palsy, MixedUnited Kingdom
-
Hilde FeysHasselt University; ETH Zurich; Curtin UniversityRecruitingHemiplegic Cerebral Palsy | Cerebral Palsy, SpasticBelgium
-
University of California, San FranciscoNational Institutes of Health (NIH)RecruitingDystonic Cerebral Palsy | Dyskinetic Cerebral PalsyUnited States
-
MTI UniversityEnrolling by invitationSpastic Diplegic Cerebral PalsyEgypt
-
East Carolina UniversityRecruitingHemiplegic Cerebral Palsy | Unilateral Cerebral Palsy | Remote Ischemic ConditioningUnited States
-
October 6 UniversityCompletedSpastic Cerebral Palsy | Spastic Hemiplegic Cerebral PalsyEgypt
-
Marmara UniversityUnknownCerebral Palsy, Spastic | Cerebral Palsy, Spastic, DiplegicTurkey
Clinical Trials on functional exercise training
-
US Department of Veterans AffairsCompleted
-
Eastern Mediterranean UniversityCompleted
-
Universitat Pompeu FabraCol·legi de Fisioterapeutes de Catalunya; Ajuntament de MataróNot yet recruiting
-
Goethe UniversityUnknownExercise | Cognition
-
Swinburne University of TechnologyNational Sports Institute of MalaysiaCompletedHealthy | Overweight | Physical InactivityMalaysia
-
Chinese University of Hong KongEnrolling by invitation
-
Linkoeping UniversitySahlgrenska University Hospital, SwedenCompleted
-
Biruni UniversityIstanbul Galata UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Umm Al-Qura UniversityPrincess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman UniversityRecruitingStroke | Splints | Physical DisabilitySaudi Arabia
-
University Medical Centre LjubljanaSlovenian Research AgencyUnknownKidney Diseases | Chronic Kidney Diseases | Physical Activity | End Stage Renal Disease | Kidney FailureSlovenia