Laparoscopic Ultrasound Guided Minimal Invasive Excision of Intra-/Retroperitoneal Tumors

May 28, 2021 updated by: Michael Bau Mortensen, Odense University Hospital

Laparoscopic Ultrasound Guided Minimal Invasive Excision of Intra-/Retroperitoneal Tumors in Patients Scheduled for Laparotomy: A Pilot Study

Patients included in the study went through standard preoperative preparation and were informed about potential conversion to open surgery. The procedure started with LUS performed according to the department's standard guidelines (one twelve mm trocar in the midline and one 12 mm trocar in the left upper quadrant) followed by a stepwise scanning of relevant structures (e.g. liver, pancreas, retroperitoneum) with dedicated laparoscopic ultrasound equipment (BK Medical, Herlev, Denmark). If the suspected lesion(s) was detected by LUS in the relevant area (according to preoperative imaging), laparoscopic resection was attempted, and if successful the specimen was removed in an eEndo-bBag (Kebomed, Denmark) through one of the trocars. A second LUS was performed to ensure that no tumor was left behind ("loss-of-lesion(s)").

If any problem occurred during the laparoscopic procedure, the operation was converted to an open procedure. Prophylactic antibiotics were not given routinely but were administered during surgery at the surgeons' discretion.

The intra- and postoperative course and final clinical outcome including pathology reports were retrieved from the patient's electronical records. This included a postoperative follow up of at least 12 months to investigate potential incomplete resection. Postoperative complications were graded according to Dindo-Clavien (17). The pathology reports were retrieved from the Danish Pathology Registry.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

20

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The patients were discussed at the Upper or Lower GI Multidisciplinary Team conferences MDT in order to make sure that only patients where explorative laparotomy was considered the next and only possible clinical step, were referred for the minimal invasive procedure.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients with intra- and retroperitoneal tumor(s) (IRT) detected by imaging (US/CTMR/PET or EUS) and a clinical indication for explorative laparotomy

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients with contraindications for laparoscopy, such as severe adherences were excluded

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Tumor localization
Time Frame: 12 months
Positive LUS localization of the tumor(s) in minimum 15 patients
12 months
LUS guided resection
Time Frame: 12 months
A complete LUS guided resection in minimum 15 patients
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Complications
Time Frame: 12 months
No clinical important complications (Dindo-Clavien ≥3) in any of the patients where LUS guided resection was performed and completed
12 months
Final diagnosis
Time Frame: 12 months
A pathological diagnosis was obtained based on the resected tumor(s) in all cases. The LUS guided procedure should obviate the need for (subsequent) open surgery in all patients
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 30, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 28, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 28, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

June 3, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 3, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 28, 2021

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MBM-41

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Laparoscopic Ultrasound

3
Subscribe