Effects of Ultrasound-guide Hypertonic Dextrose Injection for Chronic Subacromial Bursitis

September 2, 2021 updated by: ShihWei Huang, Taipei Medical University Shuang Ho Hospital
The aim of this study is to investigate the echoguide hypertonic injection and compared steroid injection in subacromial bursitis patients about clinical and ultrasound image presentation.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Subacromial bursitis is one of the major causes of chronic refractory shoulder pain. It can cause patients with shoulder pain when shoulder exercise and heavy lifting and limiting the range of motion. It can also influence the sleep quality due to pain symptoms of the shoulder. Usually, these patients had limited response to medication and physical modality. Steroid injection was often adopted for intervention, but the adverse effects should be considered. Therefore, prolotherapy was taken as an alternative treatment for chronic subacromial bursitis. It involves the injection of small volumes of an irritant agent, most commonly a hyperosmolar dextrose solution, at the lesion site. Hyperosmolar dextrose appears to be the most commonly used agent today. The aim of this study is to investigate hypertonic injections in subacromial bursitis patients about clinical and ultrasound image presentation. The investigators conducted a double-blinded randomized controlled trial for 60 participants with chronic shoulder pain for 3 months with subacromial bursitis. In the study group, the echo guide 20% dextrose water was injected into the lesion site, and the control group received the echo guide steroid injection. ROM, SPADI, VAS, x-ray, and ultrasound data were obtained at baseline. At weeks 2, 6, 12, ROM, SPADI, VAS, and ultrasound data were evaluated. The ANOVA and independent t-test are applied for analysis by SPSS 20.0 with a P value less than 0.05 as statistical significance.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Zhonghe Dist
      • New taipei city, Zhonghe Dist, Taiwan, 235
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Shuang Ho Hospital
      • New taipei city, Zhonghe Dist, Taiwan, 235
        • Recruiting
        • Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital,Ministry of Health and Welfare
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged more than 20 years old with diagnosis of chronic supraspinatus tendinosis by ultrasound and clinical shoulder pain lasting for more than 3 months.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of shoulder fracture and operation, with frozen shoulder or full thickness ruptur of rotator cuff, steroid, or hyaluronic acid, or platelet rich plasma (PRP) injection during the period of intervention and following up.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 20% hypertonic dextrose water injection group
echo guide 20% dextrose water 3ml was injection in lesion site
20% hypertonic dextrose water injection for chronic shoulder pain
Other Names:
  • Prolotherapy group
Active Comparator: Steroid injection group
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40mg/ml, 1ml, and Lidocaine 2ml as the active comparator group
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40mg/1ml injection
Other Names:
  • comparatice group

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline in Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (change of SPADI)
Time Frame: Week0 Week2 Week6 Week12
Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), a self-administered assessment tool that was used to measure pain and disability related to shoulder disease. The SPADI consists of 5 pain and 8 disability items that are measured on a visual analog scale. Pain and disability subscales were calculated as the mean of the corresponding items on a 0-100 scale; the highest score indicated the most severe pain and disability. The total outcome score used for statistical analysis was calculated as the sum of the pain and disability subscales.
Week0 Week2 Week6 Week12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Shoulder ROM (Range of Motion)
Time Frame: Week0 Week2 Week6 Week12
Pain-free passive range of motion (PROM) of the shoulder was designated as the range of motion attained at the most painful position and was measured using a digital goniometer in 6 directions flexion, extension, abduction, adduction, external rotation and internal rotation. Five directions of the shoulder joint were measured (flexion, abduction, adduction, internal rotation, and external rotation) while participants were lying in a supine position. Additionally, shoulder extension was measured in the side-lying position.
Week0 Week2 Week6 Week12
Pain (VAS, Visual Analogue Scale)
Time Frame: Week0 Week2 Week6 Week12
Shoulder pain was assessed according to an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS). This tool was simple to use and was highly correlated with the visual analog scale, verbal rating scale, and Faces Pain Scale-Revised. The NRS is considered a valid and reliable pain assessment tool. The pain intensity was graded from 0 (no pain) to 10 (the most intense level of pain). The participants reported their pain level at rest and during the movement of shoulder joint in all direction. The most painful movement score was used for further data analysis.
Week0 Week2 Week6 Week12
Ultrasound
Time Frame: Week0 Week2 Week6 Week12
The ultrasound evaluated the thickness of subarcomial bursa
Week0 Week2 Week6 Week12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Lien-Chieh Lin, Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital,Ministry of Health and Welfare

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 10, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

November 30, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 2, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 2, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

June 7, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 5, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 2, 2021

Last Verified

September 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Shoulder Pain

Clinical Trials on hypertonic dextrose water

3
Subscribe