Effects of Short Wave Diathermy Added on Dextrose Prolotherapy Injections in Osteoarthritis of the Knee

April 30, 2019 updated by: Hale Karapolat, Ege University

Goal: To show the effects of short wave diathermy added on prolotherapy injections in osteoarthritis of the knee on pain, physical functioning and quality of life.

Material and Methods: 63 patients with osteoarthritis of the knee with Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) class 2 or 3 were included in the study. Patients were randomized to two grous, first being dextrose prolotherapy+ short wave diathermy(SWD), and second being dextrose prolotherapy with sham SWD. Patients were injected with dextrose prolotherapy solutions in the beginning, 3rd and 6th week of the study, for a total of 3 times, and took 20 minutes of SWD after injection(true or sham). Western Ontorio and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Visual Analogous Scale for pain(VAS) and Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)were applied before, after(6th week) and at the 3rd month of treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

63

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Izmir, Turkey, 35100
        • Ege University School of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

43 years to 73 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Inclusion criteria were being between 45 and 75 years old, knee pain of 3 months or longer duration, and having OA of the knee compatible with Kellgren-Lawrance class 2 or 3

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients using analgesics other than acetaminophen, having pregnancy, diabetes mellitus, infectious or inflammatory arthritis, hemophilia, knee prosthesis, history of knee injections in last 3 months or anticoagulant use, allergy to ingredients of the solutions, having cardiac pacemaker or other device, or metallic implants were exluded from the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Short wave diathermy group

Patients were randomized into 2 groups depending on their patient number, with odd numbers being recruited to SWD group, and even numbers to sham SWD group.

Prolotherapy solutions were injected using 25 gauge needle, with solutions being 6 ml 25 % dextrose (3 ml 20% dextrose + 3 ml 30% dextrose) for intraarticular, and 20 ml 15% dextrose (10 ml 0,9% NaCl + 10 ml 30% dextrose) for periarticular.

SWD group took short wave diathermy with specifications of 400 watt power output, 27.12 MHz frequency, 11.06m wave length, using condensators and electrodes of 12 cm diameter parallel to the knee for 20 minutes(Enraf-Nonius, Curapuls 970 Short wave diathermy device). Both groups took injections in the beginning of the therapy, 3rd week and 6th week, a total of 3 times. SWD or sham SWD therapy was given right after the injections, also for a total of 3 times.

SWD group took short wave diathermy with specifications of 400 watt power output, 27.12 MHz frequency, 11.06m wave length, using condensators and electrodes of 12 cm diameter parallel to the knee for 20 minutes(Enraf-Nonius, Curapuls 970 Short wave diathermy device).
Prolotherapy solutions were injected to the knee by a blinded physician in the group, using 25 gauge needle, with solutions being 6 ml 25 % dextrose (3 ml 20% dextrose + 3 ml 30% dextrose) for intraarticular, and 20 ml 15% dextrose (10 ml 0,9% NaCl + 10 ml 30% dextrose) for periarticular. Injection points wwere defined as medial collateral ligaments, adhesion points of quadriceps tendon, adhesion points of patellar tendon, tuberositas tibia, pes anserinus, lateral collateral ligaments, coronal ligaments, medial and lateral tibia plateaus. Patients were blinded to their treatment groups
Other Names:
  • Hypertonic dextrose injections
Sham Comparator: Sham diathermy group

Patients were randomized into 2 groups depending on their patient number, with odd numbers being recruited to SWD group, and even numbers to sham SWD group.

Prolotherapy solutions were injected using 25 gauge needle, with solutions being 6 ml 25 % dextrose (3 ml 20% dextrose + 3 ml 30% dextrose) for intraarticular, and 20 ml 15% dextrose (10 ml 0,9% NaCl + 10 ml 30% dextrose) for periarticular.

Sham SWD group took 20 minutes of SWD therapy with device not working(Enraf-Nonius, Curapuls 970 Short wave diathermy device).

Prolotherapy solutions were injected to the knee by a blinded physician in the group, using 25 gauge needle, with solutions being 6 ml 25 % dextrose (3 ml 20% dextrose + 3 ml 30% dextrose) for intraarticular, and 20 ml 15% dextrose (10 ml 0,9% NaCl + 10 ml 30% dextrose) for periarticular. Injection points wwere defined as medial collateral ligaments, adhesion points of quadriceps tendon, adhesion points of patellar tendon, tuberositas tibia, pes anserinus, lateral collateral ligaments, coronal ligaments, medial and lateral tibia plateaus. Patients were blinded to their treatment groups
Other Names:
  • Hypertonic dextrose injections

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analogous Scale(for the intensity of pain)(VAS)
Time Frame: 3 months
VAS was used to assess the resting pain intensity of the subjects. Patients were asked to show their intensity of pain on a 10 cm long line, with 0 end being no pain, and 10 cm end being highest amount of pain possible. The distance between the mark and the 0 end was measured and the result was recorded as milimeters.
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Western Ontorio and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)
Time Frame: 3 months
WOMAC is an index for the assessment of osteoarthritis consisting of 24 questions, with subscales being pain(5 questions), stiffness(2 questions) and physical functioning(17 questions). Turkish version of the test is expressed as a likert type scale, ranging from 0 to 4, with greater numbers expressing higher severity. The greater scores are associated with more severe disease
3 months
Short Form-36 (SF-36)
Time Frame: 3 months
SF-36 is an index for the evaluation of quality of life in a broad range of patients. It consists of 8 domains: Physical function, bodily pain, role-physical, general health, vitality, social function, role-emotional, and mental health. Each domain is expressed separately, rather than a total score. All of the domains are given from 0 to 100 points, with greater values being associated with a better quality of life.
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 4, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 4, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

April 4, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 26, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 26, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

April 30, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 2, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 30, 2019

Last Verified

April 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Knee Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on Short wave diathermy

3
Subscribe