Self-Management for Persistent Subacromial Pain

December 6, 2019 updated by: Oslo Metropolitan University

Adherence to Self-managed Exercises for Patients With Persistent Subacromial Pain: A Feasibility Study for the Ad-Shoulder Trial

Physiotherapy-led exercises is the first line treatment for patients with subacromial pain. However, current evidence report that most treatment programmes only show a short-term benefit. There seem to be a potential for enhancing the effectiveness of exercise interventions by improving adherence to self-managed exercises, but there is lack of knowledge about adherence to exercise programmes in shoulder pain. Before conducting a planned randomised controlled trial on the clinical effectiveness of an intervention focusing on adherence to a self-managed exercise strategy (the Ad-Shoulder intervention), it is necessary to run a feasibility study in order to establish whether such a resource-demanding trial is worthwhile. Feasibility studies are designed to answer the key question "Can it work?" The main objectives of the present study was to assess the feasibility in terms of recruitment capability, data collection procedures and acceptability of the Ad-Shoulder intervention in patients with subacromial pain receiving treatment in primary or secondary health care.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

11

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Oslo, Norway
        • Diakonhjemmet Hospital
      • Oslo, Norway
        • Oslo Metropolitan University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pain located to the upper arm
  • Had previously received conservative treatment due to subacromial pain
  • Still seek primary or secondary care during the past 6 months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Frozen shoulder diagnosis (<50% external rotation compared to contralateral side)
  • Patients who have received surgical treatment due to shoulder problems
  • Pregnant patients
  • Patients with insufficient Norwegian language skills
  • Serious psychiatric disorder

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Self-Managed Exercise Strategy
The intervention is a personalised supported self-management intervention which emphasises dynamic, progressively loaded exercises for the shoulder. The intervention consisted of 1-5 individual sessions provided over 3 months, with a duration of 1 hour for the first session and 45 minutes for the following. The participants will have the opportunity to contact the physiotherapist by phone, text message or e-mail for advice during the treatment period (12 weeks). The personalised supported self-management intervention will be based on the components of the self-management framework, provided by Lorig and Holman (2003). The five self-management skills and the operationalization of these will be described when publishing the study. For specific content reporting of the self managed exercises we will follow the Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recruitment rate
Time Frame: 3 months
How many people that were eligible and how many people that were recruited per week
3 months
Follow-up rate
Time Frame: 3 months
Determine the follow-up rate - measured by the percentage of participants who were followed up successfully until the three months follow-up
3 months
Actigraph assessment of physical activity
Time Frame: 3 months
Feasibility of Actigraph assessment of physical activity - measured by percentage of participants with valid data at Week 0, Week 6 and 3 months
3 months
Adherence
Time Frame: 3 months
Determine whether the patients adhere with the self-managed exercises - measured by self-reported exercise log book
3 months
Fidelity
Time Frame: 3 months
Determine whether the therapists delivered the intervention as planned - measured by assessing the therapists' log book
3 months
Adverse events
Time Frame: 3 months
Determine number and nature of adverse events via self-report questionnaire
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI)
Time Frame: 3 months
SPADI is a self-reported questionnaire for patients with shoulder pain. The questionnaire consists of 13 questions divided into two domains: pain (five items) and function (eight items) and scored on a numerical scale 0 (best) to 10 (worst) with a score range from 0 to 100 points
3 months
Patient Specific Function Scale (PSFS)
Time Frame: 3 months
PSFS is a patient specific outcome measure where the patient is asked to name three activities which the patient find challenging or are not able to do because of their shoulder pain. Patients rate their ability to complete the activities on a 11-point scale at a level experienced prior to injury or change in functional status. "0" represents "unable to perform" and "10" represents "able to perform at prior level".
3 months
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Time Frame: 3 months
Pain intensity during the last week was measured using the NPRS (ranging from 0 = no pain, 10 = the most intense pain imaginable). Repeated measures: During a one week pre-treatment phase (A), 3 times. During the 12 week treatment phase (B): collected twice every week. During a one week post-treatment phase (A): 3 times
3 months
Pain self-efficacy 2-item short form (PSEQ-2 item)
Time Frame: 3 months
Measured using a 2-item questionnaire by asking the patients' how confident they are doing some form of work and to live a normal lifestyle at present, despite the pain (ranging from 0 = not at all confident, 6 = completely confident). Repeated measures: During a one week pre-treatment phase (A), 3 times. During the 12 week treatment phase (B): collected twice every week. During a one week post-treatment phase (A): 3 times
3 months
Self-efficacy
Time Frame: 3 months
Measured using one modified question from the Musculoskeletal Health Questionnaire: "How confident have you felt about managing your shoulder pain by yourself (responses were not at all confident, slightly, moderately, very and extremely)? Repeated measures: During a one week pre-treatment phase (A), 3 times. During the 12 week treatment phase (B): collected twice every week. During a one week post-treatment phase (A): 3 times
3 months
Working Ability Index
Time Frame: 3 months
Work ability will be measured on a 11-point scale (0 = Can not work at all, 10 = working ability is best right now)
3 months
EQ-5D-5L
Time Frame: 3 months
Generic health-related quality of life will be assessed by the EQ-5D. It evaluates 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, activities of daily living, pain, and anxiety and/or depression. For each dimension the patient describes three possible levels of problems (none, mild-to-moderate, and severe).
3 months
Global Perceived Effect scale (GPE)
Time Frame: 3 months
The patient rated perception of change at the follow-ups will be assessed on a Global Perceived Effect scale (GPE) at follow-up (52). The response alternatives were: 1 = "completely recovered", 2 = "much improved", 3 = "slightly improved", 4 = "no change", 5 = "slightly worse", 6 = "much worse", and 7 = "worse than ever".
3 months
Bergen Insomnia Scale
Time Frame: 3 months
Pain-interference with sleep will be assessed by the Bergen Insomnia Scale, which consists of six items. Scoring 3 or above on at least one of the first four items and scoring 3 or above on at least one of the last two items indicate the presence of insomnia.
3 months
Kinesiophobia
Time Frame: 3 months
Kinesiophobia will be assessed using one question: "How much 'fear' do you have that these complaints would be increased by physical activity? (scores range from 0 = no fear, to 10 = very much fear).
3 months
Physical activity (self-reported)
Time Frame: 3 months
Physical activity will be assessed by the 3 questions from the Nord-Trondelag Health Study (HUNT) regarding frequency, intensity and duration.
3 months
Physical activity (accelerometer)
Time Frame: 3 months
To objectively measure physical activity an accelerometer (AX3, 3-axis Logging Accelerometer) was used. This accelerometer provides information about movement and will enable us to objectively measure the amount of general physical activity (minutes of moderate activity). The patients will be measured for three consecutive days at baseline, at 6 weeks and at 3 months to assess changes between the three time points (Week 0, Week 6 and 3 months.
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Daniel Major, MSc, Oslo Metropolitan University
  • Principal Investigator: Yngve Røe, PhD, Oslo Metropolitan University
  • Study Chair: Margreth Grotle, PhD, Oslo Metropolitan University
  • Study Chair: Chris Littlewood, PhD, Keele University
  • Study Chair: Dagfinn Matre, PhD, National Institute of Occupational Health, Norway
  • Study Chair: Heidi V Gallet, MSc, Diakonhjemmet Hospital
  • Study Director: Hege Bentzen, PhD, Oslo Metropolitan University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 12, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

September 12, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 18, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 6, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

December 9, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 9, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 6, 2019

Last Verified

December 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Shoulder Pain Chronic

Clinical Trials on Self-Managed Exercise Strategy

3
Subscribe